📖🔓Read the full open-access paper here:

It was wonderful to collaborate on this with some fantastic colleagues:.Jörg Matthes, @nicoleta_corbu, @claesdevreese, @esserfrank_, Karolina Koc-Michalska, Christian Schemer, Yannis Theocharis & @janzilinsky.

These patterns hold across the topics reported, citizens' political extremity, their pre-existing attitudes toward AI, age, and media trust.

We examine this issue with a pre-registered conjoint experiment in the US (N = 2,011) that mimics a high-choice media environment. We find:.-Citizens evaluate AI-attributed news as negatively as cross-cutting partisan sources. -Citizens still strongly prefer like-minded sources.

New paper alert!🔓🚨.As AI is increasingly adopted in newsrooms, little is known about how people perceive it in today’s polarized media environment. Studies find a preference for news by human journalists, but what if the human content comes from cross-cutting partisan sources?.

RT @OmerYair1: מעלים פה תכנים פוליטיים? חושבים כל הזמן על פוליטיקה? . השרשור הזה הוא עבורכם - ועליכם!. בכתבה ב-@the7i, אני מציג ממצאי מחקר….

RT @SocialM76238155: מוכנים להוביל את מהפכת המידע של המאה ה-21? התוכנית בניהול מידע וידע בחוג לתקשורת מציעה את המפתח להצלחה בעולם הדיגיטלי….

RT @EranAmsalem: 1/5 How does factual knowledge affect political attitudes? With the brilliant Nick Stagnaro, we find that learning facts r….

RT @djeditorialteam: ONLINE FIRST & OPEN ACCESS! This study by Jörg Matthes, @alonzoizner, @AndreasNanz et al. examines incidental politica….

The full open-access paper can be found here:

Citizens also downplay and rationalize broken promises from their own side but not from opponents. Together, our findings suggest that the impact of broken promises is context-dependent and often quite limited.

We find that broken promises hurt domain-specific evaluations but have little impact on overall performance ratings. Moreover, the effects are limited when people already know the politician.

🔓🚨 New open-access paper! 🚨🔓. Campaign promises are common—but do citizens punish politicians for breaking them?. Together with @EranAmsalem, we ran 4 experiments (N = 7,030) in the U.S. & Israel to test how people react when ingroup and outgroup politicians break their word.

שמחתי להתארח בפודקסט דמוקרTEAM של @LibResInst ולשוחח על שיח פוליטי רעיל של יוזרים ברשתות החברתיות ושל פוליטיקאים. תוכלו לשמוע על הסיבות והתוצאות של שיח פוגעני בפוליטיקה, כולל מחקר שלי בנושא שניתח מיליוני ציוצים בטוויטר ישראל בתקופה הסוערת לפני 7 באוקטובר.

RT @EranAmsalem: Politicians in many countries are becoming increasingly extreme. They propose more radical solutions to societal problems….

RT @YuvalFeinstein: I am happy to share this call for applicants for a tenure-track/tenured position (open rank and topic) in the Departmen….

RT @yair__amitai: 1. אנחנו שומעים הרבה על כך שהחברה הישראלית מקוטבת, האם זה נכון? במחקר שלי עם @NoamGidron ו-@OmerYair1 מצאנו לצערנו שכן.….

RT @jennifer_oser: 👇2 more days to deadline (May 25) for this Postdoc call on "Participation and Representation in the Digital Age"! . From….

RT @jennifer_oser: 📢Postdoc Call for @ERC_Research project on Political Participation and Representation in the Digital Age!. The 2-3 year….

RT @hevra_haifa: Measuring Communication Concepts #ISF Workshop Chaired by @YarivTsfati, attended by renown communication researchers. 👋🎙️….