🇺🇸🇬🇧🚨BREAKING: The U.S. government has warned the UK that the prosecution of Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, who silently prayed near an abortion facility, marks: “an unwelcome departure from the shared values that ought to underpin US-UK relations”

I’m incredibly honored to work with and receive help from the Alliance Defending Freedom. @ADFIntl We successfully sued the Australian government in a victory for freedom of speech this year, after their eSafety Commissioner tried to censor me on @X. And we are now taking

The US state department recognise this charge is an 'unwelcome departure from the shared values that ought to underpin US-UK relations.' I would say it's also an unwelcome departure from common sense and basic human rights. https://t.co/tDjJKywSPc

An appropriate response by the U.S., my thanks to @SecRubio and all those at @StateDept involved in speaking up for, well, freedom of speech! (H/t to @LoisMcLatch for posting about this.)

Isabel will face trial in 2026 for standing on a public street near an abortion facility, Silently praying. The Telegraph has the story👇

Isabel will face trial in 2026 for standing, praying silently in her head on a public street near an abortion clinic 🙏 We shouldn’t need the U.S. to defend our free speech in the UK - but at this rate, somebody has got to! 🇬🇧🇺🇸

🚨BREAKING: The US government has criticised the UK for prosecuting pro-life Christian Isabel Vaughan-Spruce for silently praying! 🇺🇸🇬🇧

Religious freedom is grounded in human dignity. Everyone has the right to freely and peacefully express their beliefs. @Paul_B_Coleman on @Axiomamedia:

6 years ago, Finnish MP Päivi Räsänen was criminally charged for tweeting a Bible verse. In October, The Supreme Court of Finland heard her case, and the awaited decision could set a precedent for freedom of speech in Europe. @PaiviRasanen on @Axiomamedia:

🚨UK Christian, Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, has been criminally charged AGAIN. For standing, praying silently, holding pro-life views in her mind within 150m of an abortion facility. This is the first case under the new "buffer zones" law. Silent prayer is NOT a crime.

Christians in Nigeria are facing unimaginable acts of violence, all because of their faith. Now is Nigeria's chance to turn the tide, put an end to this persecution, and protect religious freedom. ✍️@KristenWaggoner for @WNGdotorg

This week, the European Parliament debated the persecution of Christians in Nigeria and the mass kidnapping of children from Saint Mary's Catholic School. As MEP @MiriamMLex stated: "Christians are killed six times more often and kidnapped five times more often than the rest

Don’t let the EU off the hook on free speech. We wrote to the European Commission to remind Brussels exactly how the DSA imperils free expression. 🧵 Read the full letter 👇

🚨TODAY: We're in Glasgow supporting Rose Docherty at her first court hearing. Rose was arrested in September for holding a sign offering consensual conversation within 200m of a hospital, where a "buffer zone" is in place, banning "influence". How can a chat be criminal?🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

🚨Consensual conversation is not a crime. Yet Rose was in court this morning, faced with charges for just that - Offering a chat within 200m of a hospital in Glasgow, where a censorial “buffer zone” prohibits “influence”. We’re supporting Rose’s legal defence. 👇

PARENTS: What does it mean to LOVE a child who claims to be trans? A) help them love the skin they’re in, made perfectly the way they are? B) push them towards a lifetime of bodily abuse? ‼️GB News clash 👇

This is a really great mini-doc on the persecution of Christians in Nigeria 🇳🇬 from @GC_Relief 👇

The 2025 DSA review was a moment for the Commission to show leadership on free speech. Instead, it sidestepped the biggest criticisms of the DSA and postponed free speech questions to 2027. If the Commission wants credibility, it should publish who was consulted in their review

The Commission claims the DSA is “content agnostic” because it doesn’t directly delete posts. That’s misleading and they know it. The DSA applies heavy pressure on platforms to censor content on ideological grounds such as mitigating so-called “disinformation” and “risks to

As for the potential of exporting EU censorship around the world, the Commission says the DSA shouldn’t apply beyond Europe “in principle”. In reality, platforms apply EU rules globally to avoid fines. Brussels is attempting to establish the DSA as a global norm in digital