Good post by
@Noahpinion
on the practical results of the wealth tax on France, which had a top rate of 1.5% - 1.8%. Turns out this isn’t a new idea, and the results aren’t great. 🤷♂️
@adamnash
@Noahpinion
Your tweet is misleading. It didn’t generate the expected revenue. But it didn’t cause the collapse of the nation. And they achieved the same policy goals through other means.
@RickMandler
@Noahpinion
Which part of my tweet is misleading again? Specifically? Is the bar for “great” that it didn’t cause the collapse of the nation? 🤔
@adamnash
@Noahpinion
I didn’t read the proposed taxes, would it be on world wide wealth? Moving to another country wouldn’t work then, they would need to give up the citizenship.
@adamnash
@benedictevans
@Noahpinion
Well, history repeats itself.
At some point in the past the French, being really fed up, stormed the Bastille.
I fear not only climate tipping point is near.
So there should b a proper solution soon.
Imagine for a moment that your sick child or elderly parent requires daily medication.Not that it isn’t bad enough that YOU can’t withdraw your money, but the uncertainty of it all!This isn’t made up,this is real! Bitcoin was made this scenario,YOUR money when you need it most!!
@adamnash
@Noahpinion
Have you come across any good counter arguments to this that are worth reading as a devil's advocate? It seems pretty strong to me.
@adamnash
@Noahpinion
I really think simplifying the code to reduce the number of tax-advantaged investments and structures (trusts and the like) would make much more revenue without all the negative effects on entrepreneurship.
@arajan
@Noahpinion
Sure. The US is unique on multiple dimensions. Largest & most diverse economy in the world.
Problem is, unique nature is an argument against change as well as for it. Wealth tax has a lot of empirical data, we can always choose to ignore it.