I couldn’t agree more.

https://t.co/42RYdW7l88 Excellent questions from David Goy on this consultancy that is costing us all 350K with no obvious benefit in return.

Housing costs remained a key driver of inflation, with mortgages and rents continuing to increase 👉 https://t.co/epllk6wnti

Good Man.

@richarddigard It’s pointless protecting derelict greenhouses sites just because “that was the deal” when they were originally built. The housing crisis of today must trump that. By replacing eyesore sites with much-needed housing, the existing green fields can be protected. Ideal compromise.

@YoungGuern Totally agree with you. Build on the derelict vinery sites whilst protecting the existing green fields. Ugly eyesore greenhouses left for decades serve no purpose whatsoever and are a total waste of scarce land. How can essentially needed housing not be a priority usage?

https://t.co/jTlrtEqpdZ Why protect disused vineries? What social purpose does rotting wood and brambles serve? I’m so sick of this attitude. People are homeless, young people are fleeing the island in droves and our economy is stagnating but god forbid we clear derelict land.

I'm not saying there isn't necessarily room to cut in middle management but when you're talking real terms budget cuts you really are playing with fire. It's a fine line to walk and the damage done to the public sector in the UK over the past decade should be instructive.

Perhaps a lesson here for Deputies like Andy Sloan and Haley Camp who have hopped on the austerity bandwagon. UK prison service budget 13% down from 2010 and there's been a 128% increase in accidental releases over just the past year.

> Says he wants net zero. > Hates nuclear.

I mean it's not really "despite" is it? That's where the money comes from.

More evidence of why our potential new super-reservoir at Les Vardes is so essential to the future of our water security in Guernsey. Months of below average rainfall followed by a months worth in a day. If we can't store it we'll lose it.

It's not often that I find myself agreeing wholeheartedly with @gavinstpier but here we are

I'm sure this amendment is well meaning but it seems ill conceived to me. There are much better ways to help those who are struggling financially without subsidising everyone, rich or poor, who drives a car.

I don't own a car in order to avoid all the ridiculous costs associated with it. If the expected rise in fuel duty is shifted onto something else that I do pay for am I not, in effect, being forced to subsidise other peoples car ownership?

The AI music is stopping.

If more support is put in place are we risking getting into a position where you have a better chance of getting a flat of your own if you commit serious crimes than if you keep your nose clean and still live with your parents?

https://t.co/l21G0nI9aT I’m not trying to downplay the issues faced by people leaving prison accessing housing but everyone is facing those issues.

https://t.co/IZBYZiXGAw

the way how there's little difference between minimum wage and a £30k salary these days but companies still out here like, "a very generous salary of up to £30k"