
ValueStockGeek
@ValueStockGeek
Followers
81K
Following
39K
Media
8
Statuses
52
Index funds are great for the masses, but if you're rich and financially sophisticated you should be buying extremely complicated investments that will probably underperform over the long run while blowing a massive amount of money on fees so you can feel superior to the masses.
I hate to break it to you but you’ll never get rich investing in index funds . Somehow the masses have been convinced if they invest $100/month they’ll be a millionaire by 65. The truth is $1 million in 40 years will buy you a Toyota Camry at best.
21
69
1K
The median household income in 1985 was $23k. If you were making $70k in 1985, you were rich.
I’m not a big fan of blaming boomers for everything but they really did have it easy. The house I grew up in was a 1500 square foot colonial my Dad bought in 1985 for $70k. Him and my mom made just a bit more than that combined at the time. It’s equivalent to a couple bringing.
2
0
8
I quit drinking in 2008, but this is 100% right. I'm wired in a way where it's either 0 drinks or 18 of them, with no middle ground. But, if you're not like that can go out and have a few drinks with friends, then it's good for your mental health to do that now and then.
Everyone blames social media for making ppl miserable these days. I think you could make the case the decline in drinking and partying plays an even bigger role. Right or wrong *most* ppl would be happier if they drank more alcohol.
2
4
109
100%. When I went from in-debt to having no debt and about $10k, it was like the weight of the world was lifted from my shoulders. In terms of overall hapiness, getting past that hurdle was more life changing than when I passed $100k or $1 million.
The most life-changing amount of money isn't hitting $1M or even $100,000. It's the first $10,000. My latest on the importance of escaping Level 1 (<$10k).
2
0
44
Check out my latest podcast with @dollarsanddata. We discuss his new book, The Wealth Ladder. Available on all platforms: Spotify, Apple, etc.
securityanalysis.org
Today I’m speaking with Nick Maggiulli.
0
1
6
In the 1990's, the biggest stocks worked. Once the environment shifted in the 2000s, it was "anything but the biggest stocks" (equal weight, mid caps, small cap value, etc.) that worked. For awhile now, the biggest stocks are what's working. It will turn again.
$MDY, the S&P 400 (the midcap index) has been sucking wind against $SPY, the S&P 500 (the large caps) since 2011 (!). MDY lagged SPY in the late 1990s but outperformed from 1999 to 2011.
4
4
63
For me, it’s more about the ethics of the person running the company. Character is destiny. If the leader is a scumbag, it’s eventually going to cause trouble. It can take a really long time, though, but you don’t want to own a share when it goes down.
Are there companies you wouldnt invest in for ethical reasons? Is there such a thing as ethical investing?. It's a tricky question. Ethics and morals are subjective. Some people say tobacco is immoral. I think it’s immoral when someone tells me I should pay more just because.
1
0
12