Title9Jen Profile Banner
Jen Profile
Jen

@Title9Jen

Followers
3K
Following
301K
Media
6K
Statuses
112K

Empathy and curiosity are underrated. In-House Tech Privacy AI | Duke U. #lawtwitter [email protected]

Climate Crises Vulnerable Land
Joined November 2010
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@Title9Jen
Jen
9 years
For those asking why #macarthurpark
34
255
573
@natolambert
Nathan Lambert
2 months
I'm really more annoyed about the lack of transparency than them catering their models to the masses (rather than power users like myself)
11
1
83
@Title9Jen
Jen
2 months
But usage is all opaque. When do Plus subs get basic visibility and controls to manage usage to caps?
@sama
Sam Altman
2 months
Updates to ChatGPT: You can now choose between “Auto”, “Fast”, and “Thinking” for GPT-5. Most users will want Auto, but the additional control will be useful for some people. Rate limits are now 3,000 messages/week with GPT-5 Thinking, and then extra capacity on GPT-5 Thinking
0
0
1
@scarylawyerguy
scary lawyerguy
2 months
Private companies are now handing the US government a cut of their profits to avoid punitive measures against them while Trump is deploying federal law enforcement on the streets of DC and the media is STILL not ready to call this authoritarianism. Do I have that right?
429
5K
18K
@alistairmcleay
Alistair McLeay
2 months
@tszzl And some of @jeremyphoward's posts on this, like:
@jeremyphoward
Jeremy Howard
2 months
PSA: If you say "think deeply" then you get the thinking model in ChatGPT for free. If you click "ChatGPT Thinking", it costs $20/month min to access, and you get limited usages.
1
1
9
@alistairmcleay
Alistair McLeay
2 months
OpenAI forgot who actually matters: Power users always lead the culture curve. They set the vibes for a product, especially in consumer software. They are the loudest, most passionate, and have the highest expectations. They are your biggest asset as a consumer company, and you
56
52
472
@MachinesBeFree
Will Durocher
2 months
I present to you OpenAI’s next big release!!
30
46
564
@Title9Jen
Jen
2 months
$500B valuation? Only OAI nukes 8 models overnight, slaps absurd caps on Plus subs, and thinks it’s gonna be well received. Leadership bubble is showing.
1
0
1
@Title9Jen
Jen
2 months
If OAI had quietly A/B tested Plus caps for a week, they’d have seen core users burn 200 in hours. Could’ve rolled out with realistic limits and kept other models as fallback. Instead: PR dumpster fire.
@sama
Sam Altman
2 months
GPT-5 rollout updates: *We are going to double GPT-5 rate limits for ChatGPT Plus users as we finish rollout. *We will let Plus users choose to continue to use 4o. We will watch usage as we think about how long to offer legacy models for. *GPT-5 will seem smarter starting
0
0
0
@levie
Aaron Levie
2 months
While fascinating, the idea of AI generating every UI on the fly is probably less likely than people think. The benefits of hyper customization likely won’t outweigh having to re-learn an app each time you use it or the risks of things breaking in unexpected ways.
@bnj
Ben South
2 months
Anyone that has lived through a major redesign knows generating UI on the fly won't be a thing for most products
96
55
804
@levie
Aaron Levie
2 months
Lots of conversation on what the future of software looks like in the enterprise. Here’s how I think it plays out. For deterministic workflows where the cost of getting something wrong is high, enterprises will have a tendency to pick core platforms for their most common,
37
95
697
@Title9Jen
Jen
2 months
Rolling out limits on Plus subs without giving users visibility and controls to manage to caps is just bad UX. Wiping out prior models overnight (and dialed in AI assistant prompts for all facete of life) is not understanding your users. Static models with choice is key.
@sama
Sam Altman
2 months
GPT-5 rollout updates: *We are going to double GPT-5 rate limits for ChatGPT Plus users as we finish rollout. *We will let Plus users choose to continue to use 4o. We will watch usage as we think about how long to offer legacy models for. *GPT-5 will seem smarter starting
1
1
5
@Daniel_Sweeney
Dan Sweeney
2 years
We may be seeing the final boss level of what @doctorow has termed #enshittification. Stunning stuff.
2
17
92
@STEWest
Shelby Edwards
2 years
Okay, now this makes some sense.
1
6
11
@Title9Jen
Jen
2 years
Plus if it’s really a daily limit why would waiting a few minutes matter?
4
1
11
@Title9Jen
Jen
2 years
Would love for Elon’s fan bois to explain how his genius tweet limiting plan includes no search, no responses, no threads, no bookmarks, no tweet history. And no doubt advertisers over the big July 4th holiday sales weekend are f’n thrilled.
1
4
16
@Title9Jen
Jen
2 years
Also massive Twitter exodus today has caused some issues at bluesky. If you have an invite code and can’t login, should be fixed soon. Just overwhelmed the beta app still trying to scale.
0
0
4
@Title9Jen
Jen
2 years
I’m tapped out but will have more soon and repeat. ❤️
@Title9Jen
Jen
2 years
Have a few blueksy invite codes if needed.
3
0
8
@Title9Jen
Jen
2 years
Have a few blueksy invite codes if needed.
5
2
12
@Title9Jen
Jen
2 years
So good. Started having this conversation with myself and friends about 3 years ago. Now it’s daily. Do I try to expat and secure safety and sanity or do I have it me to do a 2023 version of 1850s Bleeding Kansas fight and move to a red state to reclaim our country?
@usatodayopinion
USA TODAY Opinion
2 years
"In the back of my mind I'm asking: Am I being a deserter? If I am this distraught and this concerned, do I owe it to my country to do something, or do I owe my child my best efforts to keep him safe?" writes @RichelleCarey.
3
1
4
@AstroKatie
Katie Mack
2 years
Hey mutuals! If you haven’t yet used up your 600 allotted post-views for the day… ⤵️
@AstroKatie
Katie Mack
2 years
Good morning! I have a few Bluesky invites available for some mutuals; DM if interested. (Sorry, non-mutuals, you are all lovely but we just do not yet share that special bond 🥺)
5
5
95