SussilloDavid Profile Banner
David Sussillo Profile
David Sussillo

@SussilloDavid

Followers
13K
Following
2K
Media
157
Statuses
2K

Neural reverse engineer. Research scientist at Meta Reality Labs. Adjunct prof at Stanford. Prev: Google Brain, Stanford postdoc. Milton Hershey Alum.

Portola Valley, CA, USA
Joined November 2016
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
5 months
We're hiring! . Join Meta Reality Lab's EMG Wristband foundational research team! ⚡️. We're seeking research scientists with systems neuro/ML/AI/BCI/EE backgrounds, with skills on a spectrum from modeling to experimental expertise, as well as generalists who excel in both areas.
6
38
156
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
2 days
these two posts back-to-back threw me for a second
Tweet media one
1
0
4
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
2 months
I'm deeply touched to read @marinopagan's reflection on our 2013 contextual decision-making study in The Transmitter. Knowing that our work has influenced others' scientific journeys is both humbling and inspiring. 🙏.
@_TheTransmitter
The Transmitter
2 months
In our latest edition of “This paper changed my life,” @marinopagan reflects on a seminal paper that revealed the complexity of neural population dynamics and the power of recurrent neural networks.
0
6
41
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
3 months
RT @NicoleCRust: This is such a mistake - these alternative ways of testing aren't good enough "models" to evaluate new drugs. People will….
0
3
0
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
3 months
RT @_TheTransmitter: How can we make progress in developing a general model of neural computation rather than a series of disjointed models….
0
13
0
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
4 months
RT @NandoDF: Feeling pressure to work more than 5 days per week? Don’t. I’ve been super productive all my life and I never worked on the we….
0
26
0
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
6 months
Human-Computer Input via a Wrist-Based sEMG Wearable.
1
7
52
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
7 months
RT @xavierjgonzalez: We also just dropped a new blog that steps through both the the math and the code!. Blog: Post….
0
3
0
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
7 months
RT @seasonedschemer: 1/. We just open-sourced two large wrist electromyography (EMG) datasets - one towards typing without a keyboard and t….
0
21
0
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
7 months
RT @jessedmarshall: emg2pose: Hand pose estimation anywhere with neuromotor interfaces . A Dataset and Benchmark @ Neurips 2024 https://t.….
0
20
0
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
7 months
RT @scott_linderman: Did you know that you can parallelize *nonlinear* RNNs over their sequence length!? Our @NeurIPSConf paper "Towards Sc….
0
30
0
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
7 months
RT @lndriscoll: If you want to do a postdoc w me (or generally do theory at Allen/UW) apply for this!. It’s a pretty independent postdoc p….
0
41
0
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
8 months
These are just top of mind. What other papers address "psychological phenomena" while going full-stack down the neuron and also include a theoretical hypothesis at the dynamics/meso-scale?.
1
0
4
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
8 months
Here's a similar piece of work showing causal evidence for line attractor dynamics in the hypothalamus of rodents observing aggressive behavior.
1
0
6
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
8 months
Here's a paper that helps explain thirst satiety in mice. It goes all the way down to the level of individual neurons and cell types while providing a meso-scale explanation of satiety via a putative line attractor.
1
0
9
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
8 months
While I question the 90% figure, I agree with the core sentiment. However, I believe this will change significantly within the next decade or two due to improved recording methodologies, theoretical advances, and computational approaches in our understanding of how the brain.
@SpencrGreenberg
Spencer Greenberg 🔍
8 months
This is a controversial claim, but in my experience, more than 90% of the time, when people bring up neuroscience during explanations of psychological phenomena, the neuroscience adds nothing of value to the explanation other than making the explanation *seem* more authoritative.
2
4
48
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
8 months
RT @jackclarkSF: AI skeptics: LLMs are copy-paste engines, incapable of original thought, basically worthless. Professionals who track AI….
0
209
0
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
8 months
@SebastianSeung @jpillowtime .Curious on your takes. Happy to be informed I'm wrong. :).
0
0
3
@SussilloDavid
David Sussillo
8 months
No, AI Has Not Killed Marr's Three Levels, It’s Merely Maimed Them (Consider me triggered. 😂🤣). The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, particularly in neural networks and deep learning, has led some to question the relevance of classical frameworks like David Marr's.
@SebastianSeung
Sebastian Seung
8 months
Marr's three levels are dead. AI killed them.
4
16
91