Web 1.0 = pre-internet products go online Web 2.0 = user becomes the product, centralised platforms compete for your attention to sell advertising space & user data Web 3.0 = blends our digital lives into our real lives & users own (& benefit from) a stake in products they use

Is #Bitcoin dead yet? Considering hibernating for 6 months…

Gary G is shilling BTC on Twitter and you don't think an ETF is coming anon?

If Satoshi Nakamoto went as Satoshi Nakamoto for Halloween, would we be able to tell? Happy 15th anniversary to Satoshi’s famous white paper that started crypto. Any crypto companies that are tricking investors should start treating them to compliance with the securities laws.

Institutional FOMO appears to be happening

Grayscale has won their lawsuit against the SEC regarding their Bitcoin spot ETF

The courts have spoken -- between Ripple winning their suit and now Grayscale winning their suit, Gary Gensler and the SEC look like absolute clowns.

Just think about the backdrop; who does it serve to make you believe another collapse is on its way? Perhaps the elites currently quietly awaiting their Spot ETF’s? The message on Binance is spreading far faster & more efficiently than FTX… Who wants us to believe this?

The more people talk about a #Binance collapse the less I believe it’ll happen. While I believe the problems with Binance are real; we approach the anniversary of the FTX collapse & everyone expects history to repeat itself… Makes me think it won’t…

An interesting perspective; by historical standards we are far from being over valued & not far off average expected performance (midpoint) Not wedded to the idea, nor am I trading on, or expecting it. Just interesting to share @intocryptoverse @GarethSoloway @StockmoneyL

When in doubt, zoom out…. For those saying valuations are too high… S&P 500 has occupied the same channel for 92 years; since 1931 following the 1929 crash. Top of the channel is currently 75%+ above current value…. #markets #crypto #stocks $BTC

@100trillionUSD @intocryptoverse @wclemente @dylanleclair @all_things_btc @100trillionUSD simplest way to build this would be Past dates = S2F * BTC dominance on the date Future dates = S2F * live BTC dominance

Would also really appreciate any thoughts from your wonderful minds too - again, open to critiques; @RaoulGMI @investanswers @rektcapital @coinbureau @hashoshi4 @APompliano @NewsAsset @therationalroot

@100trillionUSD would appreciate your thoughts & support to create a living version of this idea published on your website! Absolutely open to critiques from any & all... @intocryptoverse @wclemente @dylanleclair @all_things_btc would particularly appreciate your feedback!

So actionable insight time; how could we use this? Maybe we should look at the S2F models as an indicator of where $BTC *SHOULD* be We could multiply the S2F models by current $BTC dominance to create a moving model that subsequently changes its forecast based on $BTC dominance

So, following this dubiously speculative logic; what price would $BTC have hit at its ATH if alts did not exist? c.$160k per $BTC. & the price would have exceeded some of the lower bounds on @100trillionUSD's #S2F / #S2Fx models.

If alts didn't exist, the same capital would likely have deployed in $BTC. So lets assume, if alts did not exist; the total crypto market cap would be at the same/similar levels but would be comprised of 100% $BTC.

Interesting thought on the impact of the broader Crypto Market to $BTC's performance relative to the #S2F type models & similar Most models called for >$100k $BTC As traders cycle between alts - $BTC, its clear the existence of so many alts is a suppressive force on $BTC price

@Bitboy_Crypto @AltcoinDailyio worth a read

@Bitboy_Crypto worth a read

Cash is here to stay; Bank of England. https://t.co/u5xJZLKRuq @coinbureau @krupda42 @hashoshi4 @NewsAsset worth a read guys. #Bitcoin #Crypto