Seth
@Sethmr
Followers
1K
Following
27K
Media
732
Statuses
16K
Trying to make the world make sense… in my head or anyone else’s. I use 𝕏 to test ideas or help boost them. Trying to avoid us vs them in all things.
Remote
Joined January 2012
I used guest mode on my grandparents YouTube, and I received pro Zionist propaganda as a YouTube ad while watching @LibertyLockPod. That never happens at my house.
0
0
0
Despise my assumption that Trump’s second term would be a disaster (even when supporting him), I’m blown away by how bad it’s been. Trump has spent the last year humiliating his movement and squandering the greatest opportunity in modern American history for real change.
3K
4K
36K
There are so many psyops and false flags I can't possibly comment on all of them. All I will say is that you must refuse any calls for censorship and reject any further gun restrictions. Don't even engage in the concocted debates. You are free people. Tell them all to fuck off.
119
729
5K
As much as I’ve defended Candace, I’m really not cool with a feud with Erika. If that’s what it takes for the true narrative to go public, the conspiracy is too entrenched and we have already lost. If she’s wrong, it’s the Alex Jones mistake.
0
0
1
@LibertyLockPod agreed with my take in his episode today. https://t.co/2RLbCi0rGk
0
0
1
I think many influencers got a wave of new viewers to their various channels and then stopped having new details about the assassination. Then Candace came in a couple weeks later and took all that steam for herself by being the only source adding to the story very publicly.
The people I’m the most confused by their positions on Candace are those I’m used to having good takes, but you can tell they are hungry for bigger audiences and feel held back (which I can empathize with). Many of them jump in on criticizing Candace directly as a grifter.
1
0
2
Candace has had many questionable takes, and many of her X posts leave me expecting more than I get during her podcast, but she has undeniably been a force that adds to the evidence we receive for Charlie’s assassination.
0
0
1
The people I’m the most confused by their positions on Candace are those I’m used to having good takes, but you can tell they are hungry for bigger audiences and feel held back (which I can empathize with). Many of them jump in on criticizing Candace directly as a grifter.
2
0
2
You are always allowed to ask questions. And you should. Every effort to shame people for doing so just inspires us more. This is the highest profile political assassination in my lifetime and the FBI literally just got done covering up a child trafficking ring Go fuck yourself.
When "just asking questions" isn't just asking questions. A growing number of people—misled by podcasters—seem to think it’s evidence of a criminal conspiracy cover-up that the FBI hasn’t released new evidence in the Charlie Kirk assassination case for several months. Neither
211
323
3K
The content wasn’t that bad. Gary is just making too censorious of headlines and too focussed on Candace. I was a big fan since Butler. I hope you have a good one. I just only have time to give my time to so many. I’m now blocked.
@paramounttactcl I’ll check it out. If I see anything bad faith, I’m pretty done following you with how much you bring her up lately.
1
0
1
Candace confirmed this was the case in today’s episode. More correct predictions :)
@hlfgal @TaylerUSA @RealCandaceO Or they already reserved an expensive restaurant and had family flying into town for it? We don’t know but everyone has a right to some kind of choice on dates for a debate. Sure, any time/any place was maybe a bit broad for Candace to say if she didn’t mean it.
0
0
1
I think I predicted the debate from the 10 minutes I watched! https://t.co/9PAFPPyhxw
@TowerGangJose This is really hard to watch. He tries to reject pragmatism based on a mathematical logic approach that hinges on being pragmatic requiring a moral framework to preexist the action. This is inherently always where we approach anything from. It’s the woke “no absolutes” approach.
0
0
0
That’s why Fauci changed the definition of Gain of Function research… because he wanted to look suspicious while having no involvement! The scientific papers have mostly been retracted and none of them did anything more than models. Just ignore the Furin Cleavage Site.
The only way anyone can possibly believe COVID originated from a lab is if they haven’t read literally any of the scientific research or investigation into the origins. It came from the wet markets, sorry.
0
0
1
Step 1: Monstano stealth funds and ghostwrites the definitive scientific review demonstrating that Round-up (glyphosate) does NOT cause cancer. Step 2: The paper is cited by the EPA and other researchers as proof of safety. Step 3: It is retracted. Step 4: Hang them all?
A full accounting on #PopularRationalism. The US E.P.A. Can No Longer Hide Behind Ghost Written Bogus Study on Glyphosate Williams et al. (2000) has (finally) been retracted, per the journal, "to preserve the scientific integrity of the journal." https://t.co/ZMdMo7xbw3
22
99
310
They copied @RepThomasMassie ‘s Cluck’s Capacitor!
0
0
0
I updated my tag from Sethmr1989 to Sethmr in case anyone thinks I’m a clone.
0
0
1