reviewercredits Profile Banner
ReviewerCredits Profile
ReviewerCredits

@reviewercredits

Followers
1K
Following
4K
Media
814
Statuses
3K

Introducing a metric for #peerreviewers. Get credits and certification for your #peerreviews and #conference talks! https://t.co/A02iSor6Qx

Joined June 2016
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
*** Our last post here! *** "Bye Bye!" Better late than never, but looking forward to seeing everyone on our growing Bluesky Social .... ๐Ÿฆ‹ ๐Ÿ’™ https://t.co/zKnaRwVDm8 @ reviewercredits https://t.co/clmUSqRwoR ๐Ÿ”ป
0
0
2
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
Peer Review Training & Engagement with Reviewer Credits! Join our upcoming FREE WEBINAR for Editors & Publishers (Thurs 27th Feb @ 2pm GMT) ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/FBYZpVAZWz ๐Ÿ”ป ( https://t.co/clmUSqRwoR) Make 2025 the year of peer review training and engagement w/ Reviewer Credits!
0
0
0
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
We're really glad you enjoyed our Peer Review Power-up Training Course! You can check it out here ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/iq0BuADNqj ๐Ÿ”ป After this quick course, you will feel ready to perform peer review effectively and positively .... #training #PeerReview #tools #PublishingTips
0
0
0
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
Our survey results ๐Ÿ“ท re AI Tools ๐Ÿ“ท "Automated Scholarly Paper Review (ASPR)") ๐Ÿ“ท https://t.co/GgvSGDVcL1 (arXiv Preprint). Interesting! & we recommend you sign-up for Scalene ๐Ÿ“ท https://t.co/Cv6M6C1Lj8) ... #publishing #ResearchIntegrity
0
0
0
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
How many #journals & #publishers are joining Reviewer Credits? GREAT QUESTION: Here is the list from last week ๐Ÿ”ป .. / https://t.co/clmUSqRwoR ๐Ÿฅฐ WELCOME!!! What do we offer to #journals & #publishers? ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/Erdi9aqB3e #AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter #publishing
0
0
0
@LexBouter
lexbouter.bsky.social
1 year
0
3
6
@fake_journals
Publishing with Integrity
1 year
Double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity https://t.co/RadMs2Mjr6
0
6
29
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
We are revisiting the age-old ๐ŸŒฐ (yet still always discussed & 'controversial'*) issue of payment for peer review ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/yPXnDX13gL Why (properly) compensate peer reviewers? // https://t.co/clmUSqRwoR ๐Ÿ”ป @AcademicChatter @acadconfessions #Academics #publishers
0
0
0
@peerrevcongress
Peer Review Congress #PRC10
1 year
We have extended the PRC abstract submission deadline to Feb 15! 2 more weeks to complete and submit your abstracts at https://t.co/pydyCrdZqk #peerreview #science #scipub #scicomm #researchethics #AIinResearch @JAMANetwork @bmj_latest @METRICStanford @NEJM @TheLancet
Tweet card summary image
peerreviewcongress.org
Enhancing the quality and credibility of science.
0
4
3
@C0PE
COPE
1 year
What should editors consider when asked to add or remove authors listed on a manuscript? What action should they take? Read COPE position: https://t.co/91mKL4bZRC
publicationethics.org
When an author requests a name change there are a few steps the editor or journal staff need to take.
0
10
13
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
We're researching the (now quite large) number of AI-assisted peer review tools out there in 'the ecosystem'. Q: How many are there? (๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/MqktUvp07q) & What do researchers think about having their work assessed w/ AI? ๐Ÿ‘‡ #publishingintegrity #researchintegrity #AI
0
0
0
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
We are delighted to announce a new partnership with @highwirepress ! We've integrated HighWire Pressโ€™ new DigiCorePro submission system into our existing suite of technical integrations ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/f7l8URRrQA #publishing #integrity #AcademicTwitter
0
0
0
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
ๆ‚จๅŠๅฎถไบบ่›‡ๅนดๅ‰้กบ ๏ผŒๅทณๅทณๅฆ‚ๆ„ !!! We wish you and your family a prosperous Year of the Snake, may everything go well! - from the team at Reviewer Credits // https://t.co/clmUSqS4ep ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ ๐ŸŽ‰
0
0
0
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
We just mailed our January Newsletter to >48,000 reviewers and researchers around the world ... ๐Ÿ‘ ๐ŸŒŽ ( https://t.co/clmUSqS4ep) .... How come you aren't signed up yet? ๐Ÿ’Œ ๐Ÿ“ญ ( https://t.co/gesnI3oa9v) #AcademicTwitter #peerreview #publishing
0
0
0
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
Getting started w/ peer review ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/Ftv6WHMTBc We've been sharing resources for early career researchers (ECRS): https://t.co/clmUSqS4ep ๐Ÿ”ป How to be a 'good' peer reviewer? @AcademicChatter @open_academia #academia #AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter #publishers
0
0
0
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
We are delighted to welcome the University of Johannesburg UJ Press ๐Ÿ“ท onto the Reviewer Credits Platform! (15 new journals) ๐Ÿ“ท https://t.co/clmUSqS4ep // https://t.co/kMbSDpGsrM ๐Ÿ“ท @AcademicChatter #AcademicSupport #journals #peerreview #partnership
0
0
0
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
".... the money part seems believable, but I'm not sure about the peer review request ? .." ๐Ÿ“ท Which are REAL and which are SPAM? If you're signed up as a verified peer reviewer on https://t.co/clmUSqS4ep you DON'T HAVE TO WORRY! (SIGN-UP HERE ๐Ÿ“ท https://t.co/gesnI3oa9v)
0
0
0
@EnagoAcademy
Enago Academy
1 year
๐Ÿ”Ethical AI in Peer Review! AI can streamline peer review, but ethical use is crucial. Get our FREE checklist with tips & guidelines from ICJME, Elsevier, Springer, MDPI, & more. ๐Ÿ‘‰Access it here: https://t.co/iSJnIkniLg #Enago #AI #PeerReview #EthicalAI #ResearchIntegrity
0
1
1
@reviewercredits
ReviewerCredits
1 year
Would you agree to peer review if the data underlying a study were not shared publicly? @renebekkers says NO! (and we agree... ) ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/WM05IYSyw2 ๐Ÿ”ป Learn more ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://t.co/YoYhaab7Aa #AcademicTwitter #AcademicSupport #AcademicChatter
0
0
0
@fake_journals
Publishing with Integrity
1 year
We have noticed that some of us (e.g. data sleuths, those protecting the integrity of the scientific archive, those who identify predatory publishers, those who track down paper mills) are spending time arguing between themselves, rather focusing on the unethical
0
4
9