Favorite bit from Augustine’s Confessions: “I have personally watched and studied a jealous baby. He could not yet speak and, pale with jealousy and bitterness, glared at his brother sharing his mother's milk.”
I’m 19 today, but it’s always been ambiguous to me whether we should celebrate or mourn the passing of time
Either way, I can certainly celebrate receiving gifts
I am an archaeo-futurist. I believe we must innovate to return to tradition. For example, women need pants with large pockets so that they can return to the “gatherer” role they once fulfilled in our hunter-gatherer past.
I believe that the largest libraries should have hotels attached. A sort of hostel for wandering scholars. Functionally speaking the university has come closest to my childish dream of the ‘live-in library’
Schumpeter makes a good point about how a potential decline of capitalism might happen. Instead of a purely economic logic leading to decline as classic Marxism outlines, he argues that capitalism will gradually erode the socio-cultural base that enables it (‘work ethic’, etc).
Werner Heisenberg makes a sharp comment concerning vague declarations of peace:
"anyone who speaks in favor of peace without stating precisely the conditions of this peace must at once be suspected of speaking only about that kind of peace in which he and his group thrive best"
Biology is a fucked up discipline at the 101 level. the student is soaked in details. I would like to start off just with extremely simple organisms and be able to learn all the relevant details. whether that would actually be a good pedagogy idk
If you look at a diagram of an ant’s path along a treacherous landscape, full of twigs and stones and so on that it must navigate around, the ant’s behavior will look very complex. But the complexity is a function of the landscape which the ant traverses, not the ant itself.
Fukuyama explains the student protests of 1968 France by saying they reacted against the “absence of struggle and sacrifice in their middle-class lives that led them to take to the streets and confront the police”
This poem about a solar eclipse by the 7th century BC Greek poet Archilochus gives a good sense of how unexpected natural occurrences must have shaped people’s appetites to believe in all sorts of other now ridiculous seeming claims; “After this, everything is believable”
I was just trying to research the semantic history of "fish" to determine at what point whales were no longer popularly called such, and stumbled across some sort of wild analytic philosophy ontological debate about whales as fish involving Carnap, Kripke, essences
It’s funny when some Silicon Valley people call woke stuff a new religion, because a lot of techno-utopianism (‘Californian ideology’ if you will) is *literally* about Immanetizing the Eschaton in the form of the singularity and things of that nature.
Borges on aesthetic theodicy (in his essay On the Cult of the Book) throughout history, in Homer's Odyssey and from Mallarme (one in the era in the spoken word, the other in the era of the written word)
Your knowledge garden –– sterile, monoculture, carefully managed, collapses if the ideological greenhouse is penetrated
My knowledge garden –– overgrown, diverse, resilient, lush, doesn't mind facing the outside world
We learn much from confident mistaken predictions of intelligent men of the past. This is Bertrand Russell predicting a dichotomy of apocalypse or world state for the future
Deleuze on people expressing themselves too much
“..we’re riddled with pointless talk, insane quantities of words and images. Stupidity’s never blind or mute. So it’s not a problem of getting people to express themselves but of providing little gaps of solitude...”
This month’s stack 😌
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity is an interesting conservative criticism of Mill’s On Liberty linking it to the chaos of French Rev and attacking his expensively abstract humanitarianism and defending hierarchies and religion as a base for morality.
My favorite decision theory paradox related to infinity is the ‘Ever Better Wine’ that improves without limit in time. How should the immortal agent who enjoys wine make a decision of when to drink it? I don’t believe that there was a rational way to choose when to have it.
I think of Hobbes as the original 'just wanted to grill' political philosopher because of the importance he placed on removing the possibility of civil conflict. That's the motivation for people submitting to the absolute sovereign, so they can grill in peace.
Imagining a future w far less mandatory educational institutions and far more extremely well trained librarians, capacious luxurious libraries with study space connecting precocious youths and home-schooling parents to the knowledge they want
Gaston Bachelard makes an interesting suggestion in the essay Metaphysics of Dust, that the basic intuition of early atomism came from observations of dust — in particular, when a ray of light suddenly shows dust floating in an empty room.
The William Blake I saw at the Getty Center — Nebuchadnezzar’s twisted visage. I hadn’t expected to find Blake there, they had several of his etchings.
Marx wanted the means of production to be distributed first, not the means of consumption. That is, a fairer distribution of wealth is supposed to be the consequence of a fairer distribution of the means of production. That is why Marxism is not welfare capitalism.
I watched True Detective Season One in the last few days, loved it. I think I’m a sucker for those sort of eerie mystery plots. Additionally I also am a sucker for the plot device of a character that hallucinates and then there is a scene where you don’t know if it’s real or not
Schelling (1960) on formal models of rationality: “It may not be an exaggeration to say that our sophistication sometimes suppresses sound intuitions, and one of the effects of an explicit theory may be to restore some intuitive notions that were only superficially ‘irrational’ ”
Tbh despite the perhaps worse aesthetic I really doubt this would be worse than much of the garbage Americans eat. Many might be better off eating the bugs! I get the dehumanizing efficiency criticism, but this criticism unfortunately holds for our current mass food practices too
Damn, early Nick Land cited in a random article I was reading goes hard.
A good point is made. Democracies, historically and presently, have often depended on the labor of workers in non-democratic conditions (Ancient Greek slaves, present day wage laborers in China)
The university is the modern Tower of Babel. God broke apart the quest for knowledge into dozens and dozens of different academic disciplines that struggle to communicate with each other to punish us for our Faustian striving.
Mildly interesting to see people react to Moore’s argument. I think the argument should be understood as resting on more general idea, ‘we know particular everyday things with more certainity than the premises of any skeptical argument so they can be used as evidence against it’
It is important to learn more than one systematic ethical theory so as to find the best way for you, personally, to justify whatever you were going to do anyways to others.
Abstraction is the root of all evils, people will go to a few museums and look at some nice images of the past online and declare themselves passionate advocates and practitioners of Western culture.