ResearchHub
@ResearchHub
Followers
41K
Following
5K
Media
413
Statuses
2K
A modern day preprint server powered by $RSC. Incentivizing the open publication of transparent research. Let's accelerate science!
Earth 🌍🌎🌏
Joined January 2019
RT @ScottExplores29: 🧪 Crypto… meet science. @ResearchHub is the GitHub of science. Anyone can now help accelerate research — not with a P….
0
3
0
RT @joycesticks: Check out the first preprint from the Center for Open Science's Lifecycle Journal to be peer reviewed on ResearchHub.
0
3
0
Read the verification report on ResearchHub and share your thoughts. 8/8.
0
0
7
Like Hussey and Elson, researchers are rechecking published findings to test if the evidence holds up. By encouraging post-preprint evaluations and ongoing updates, the Center for Open Science’s new Lifecycle Journal makes verifications like this one a core part of the.
1
0
7
Studies show that up to 45% of effect sizes in psychological meta-analyses are not reproducible, leading to different conclusions in nearly 40% of cases (Maassen et al., 2020). Many contain fixable errors, like those found in this report. 6/8.
1
0
5
When they corrected these errors and re-ran the meta-analysis:. • The effect size dropped to Hedges’ g = -0.61.• The number-needed-to-treat (NNT) jumped by 64%. NNT = number of people needed to receive a treatment for one person to benefit. ✅ ACT still showed a significant.
1
0
6
In a new report, Hussey & Elson re-extracted data from the original studies. They found issues in 3 of the 8 retrievable studies:.⚠️ Misreported sample sizes.⚠️ Identical data rows that couldn’t be explained.⚠️ Standard deviations used instead of standard errors. 4/8.
1
0
5
Originally, Zhao et al. (2023) concluded that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) had a large effect on depression. Their results reported an overall meta-analytic effect size of Hedges’ g = -1.05. In clinical psychology, that’s considered a large effect. 3/8.
1
0
4
The Center for Open Science's Life Cycle Journal submitted the study for peer review. In a verification report, Hussey & Elson reanalyzed a meta-analysis from Zhao et al. (2023) on ACT for depression and uncovered issues that call the original findings into question. 2/8.
1
0
5
A popular psychology treatment may not be as effective as we thought. A reanalysis found a 42% overestimation in the reported effect of.Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for depression.🧵. 1/8
2
11
49
RT @CoinbaseDuck: Finally, my dream came true! Time to use your $veAERO to vote for this pair! . @ResearchHub is co-founded by Base God!. I….
0
7
0
RT @AerodromeFi: The New Home Base of $RSC. $RSC from @ResearchHub is now available to trade and LP on Aerodrome, paired with $WETH & $USDC….
0
30
0
RT @ResearchHubF: $RSC is now available on Aerodrome with a new RSC/ETH pool. Try it out 👇.
0
8
0
RT @rust_ruslan: My personal top 6 list of preprints in neuroscience for this week @ResearchHub! Check them out and support open-science:👇….
0
3
0
RT @binance: Decentralized Science is reshaping how research is funded. Learn how Web3 is opening the door to transparent, collaborative, a….
0
145
0
Getting started on ResearchHub just got easier. Explore the new landing page 👇
4
11
67
RT @breath_Guy: @RHubJournal getting a nice makeover. Check out our breathwork/movement publications with them (links below). S/O to @Resea….
0
2
0
RT @joycesticks: ResearchHub's early adopters are the best! Thanks to all the funders & scientists who are collaborating in the open to cre….
0
11
0