Real Political Data
@RealPData
Followers
54K
Following
22K
Media
3K
Statuses
23K
National Conservative | Catholic | Eisenhower and Clarence Thomas Enjoyer | Not Andrew Jackson
Joined March 2022
These judges are batshit crazy. Absolutely ZERO precedent for this.
JUST IN: ICE is barred from re-detaining Salvadoran native Kilmar Abrego Garcia through the Christmas holiday, the federal judge in his immigration case said. Read more: https://t.co/dpP25kdC53
2
1
28
Prayers for Ben Sasse, cancer fucking sucks.
Former US Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE) announces he has terminal pancreatic cancer
3
2
60
This is what happens when you outsource jobs to God knows what country in Southeast Asia and remove all forms of quality control.
Microsoft confirms that a recent Windows 11 and Server 2025 update breaks RemoteApp connections.
2
1
26
The goalposts are being moved. But if you really want to use that logic, Stefanik quite literally talks about Israel all the time on social media. But seriously, what a retarded point where voters don’t care about voting records.
Here is the difference between being the real deal and being a poser. Only a poser thinks voters will rifle through @EliseStefanik's record in Congress as much as their social media timeline. Duh, both would lose. Doesn't matter. The image the party projects overall, does.
8
7
104
Funny how the second the magical reactivations end, Republicans surge
**PA WEEKLY VOTER REG UPDATE** 12/15-12/22 Net🔴+12,488 Overall Lead🔵+49,258 Gains Since Dec 24🔴+82,373 Christmas came early for the GOP with a 12k gain this week in PA. Pretty much wipes out all of the "reactivation" gains they had been getting. https://t.co/bFTgCpHqEE
6
19
299
Look at the comments, and it’s immediately clear to anyone that this whole issue is just schizophrenics on both sides fighting each other for the most deranged side.
A bunch of fools think @TheJusticeDept should have dumped all this material — UNREDACTED — to the internet. Glad I work with principled colleagues who do what’s right.
1
10
150
“I'm a pollster, not a partisan shill.” You yourself contradict your own polls all the damn time now, overstate how bad or good stuff is, and lately you’ve smeared and acted like a complete ass to anyone that remotely disagrees with you.
It's not worth it. I've been doing this far longer than my shill critics. In 2018, shills protested. In 2020, shills protested. I'm still here, most of them are not or damaged by their shilling. Truth-telling is always the best policy. I'm a pollster, not a partisan shill.
8
13
365
Neither are going to win, but to say Blakeman is going to do worse than Stefanik because Israel when Stefanik is quite literally one of the most Pro-Israel/Zionist Republicans in the House is certainly a take. Seriously, this is just retarded.
Nobody else sees it? Epstein look alike instead of @EliseStefanik is gonna get crushed. @ZohranKMamdani just crushed a field of Israel shills and this is what Republicans do in response. They're so stupid it's actually painful.
18
12
264
@RepThomasMassie @AGPamBondi Mr. Massie, you are LYING. It shows here in fine print within the bill that you drafted, that redactions are allowed to protect victims. The only thing more disingenuous than the your misleading statement, is your love life.
4
11
46
Your false dichotomy is broken. We have a new leader. We're voting with JD
Who gets your vote in a Republican primary
0
6
73
The DOJ (and really the Trump admin) screwed themselves by starting this shitfest back in March and couldn't keep their mouths shut, but at the same time, people are legit acting like schizophrenics over this.
@RealPData This is the correct take. Given the situation/real Epstein conspiracy, no matter what and how the DOJ released and redacted these files, many would take it to be a coverup, regardless of how legitimate the redactions are. But the DOJ didn’t help itself by how they did it.
5
17
149
The Epstein discourse: On one hand, you have the retards at the DOJ who did a shit job releasing the files, having some weird redactions and having terrible explanations. On the other hand, you have people that legitimately thinks a single redaction (even if it's so obviously
19
27
322
I’ve been plenty critical of Trump this year, funny how you don’t mention that.
You’re just trying to keep your following intact.
6
6
181
Being skeptical and even critical of Trump is good (and people should do it when Trump does make a legitimate mistake) but dwelling and going schizophrenic about every tiny thing he does and keep going on and on about it isn’t good for you.
2
7
109
TDS comes for all at some point if you don’t once in a while just chill out and not being hyper fixated on what you believe is a mistake that Trump makes (look at Baris, Barnes and even MTG).
22
24
355
This doesn’t even make any sense. What’s exactly the issue with Bruce Blakeman?
No, it's not. He didn't endorse the most loyal person to him and she dropped out. I just don't play that cult goober bullshit. He will lose, badly, and the only chance they had if all the stars aligned, is out.
9
5
104
No one is saying we’re going to win New York, but throwing a hissy fit because Trump is backing Bruce Blakeman (who 100% is the strongest candidate for Republicans) is stupid.
>electorally very strong in a competitive area >fairly popular county executive >is already getting the party behind him So naturally, you have a problem with it because of some God forsaken reason.
6
8
155
Multiple of the Departments under the Executive branch released 1 year highlights. Let's look through some of them!🧵
5
23
65