Pisco
@PiscoLitty
Followers
25K
Following
5K
Media
2K
Statuses
19K
Lawyer. Views and tweets are my own.
Joined August 2020
I think I know why they’re taking Trump pics down from the Epstein file dump. Even though it is insanely suspicious, they will undermine their own legal argument about why Trump stuff should be withheld if they release some of it. They are “correcting” to be consistent.
6
6
147
@FBIDirectorKash @FBI Hey dude. That @KatieMiller interview was really awkward. It felt like she was trying to embarrass you intentionally. One thing I would recommend is not to make fun of yourself so much. Once or twice fine, but it really felt like she was bullying you.
5
5
63
It’s actually delusional. “Why haven’t you asked the administration if they feel bad about sending people to CECOT?” “Let’s get Stephen Miller on so we can ask his perspective that no one has ever heard before.” LMFAO does she think people believe this crap???
5
5
45
It’s actually delusional. “Why haven’t you asked the administration if they feel bad about sending people to CECOT?” “Let’s get Stephen Miller on so we can ask his perspective that no one has ever heard before.” LMFAO does she think people believe this crap???
5
5
45
This is a stupid and incompetent person in way over her head. Hey rook, AKA @bariweiss this is pathetic and you are in way over your head. No one believes your pretext for defending MAGA and Trumpy.
New: See the memo Bari Weiss sent to some 60 Minutes staff on Sunday:
3
3
68
Hey @bariweiss LET THE STORY PLAY YOU DISGUSTING HACK.
BREAKING Sharyn Alfonsi, a correspondent for 60 Minutes, sent an internal email to colleagues stating that CBS News editor in chief Bari Weiss “spiked our story” about the Trump administration and the transfer of deportees to a prison in El Salvador. In the email — which was
2
5
89
Massie is making Trump hurt for attacking him, and on this issue he has MAGA behind him. There is only so much Johnson can do to help. For once, a Republican is openly defying Trump with zero penalty and it must feel so delicious. Shouldn’t have come at Massie Trumpy.
.@RepThomasMassie & I announce that we are bringing inherent contempt against Bondi. DOJ cowers & re-releases the 119 page document, now with "minimal redactions." Massie & I are different. We do not just do memes or speeches. We take action to fight a corrupt system.
14
6
120
Why they're taking Trump stuff down:
I think I know why they’re taking Trump pics down from the Epstein file dump. Even though it is insanely suspicious, they will undermine their own legal argument about why Trump stuff should be withheld if they release some of it. They are “correcting” to be consistent.
2
1
63
As I have said before, the INSANELY broad disclosure law along with its significant and confusing loopholes that rely on DOJ discretion probably could not be written in a more devious way to fuck with Trump (whether that was the intent or not). He can't win lol.
0
0
42
And D is probably most important in light of the Epstein dogma his supporters believe. Why are we talking about document productions? Why aren't we talking about investigations, charging, indictments, special council reports? The very posture we're in presupposes lack of trust.
1
1
54
And D is probably most important in light of the Epstein dogma his supporters believe. Why are we talking about document productions? Why aren't we talking about investigations, charging, indictments, special council reports? The very posture we're in presupposes lack of trust.
1
1
54
Trump is just seriously fucked on Epstein. A. No one will believe he's not covering up, zero trust. B. Will send his DOJ to court to defend withholdings/redacts (horrible optics). C. Good chance he will WIN the lawsuits (lol). D. If there is criminality, WHY NO CHARGE?
6
5
80
And so you guys understand in action what I’m talking about imagine following exchange: Congress: Hey we want Trump stuff. DOJ: You can’t have. Anything involving sitting president is national security. Congress: But you released some Trump stuff. DOJ: Ummm that was an error.
2
5
101
And so you guys understand in action what I’m talking about imagine following exchange: Congress: Hey we want Trump stuff. DOJ: You can’t have. Anything involving sitting president is national security. Congress: But you released some Trump stuff. DOJ: Ummm that was an error.
2
5
101
It proves at a bare minimum that there is some criteria that is Trump specific for withholding documents. Actually wild.
2
2
91
It’s such an unfixable situation. If the dem-aligned stuff, Clinton pictures were independently incriminating, the whole world would ask why no charges.
9
9
881
It was really stupid for Trump folks to selectively drop the Clinton photos. Makes them look so fucking guilty.
313
2K
38K
Trump’s No Win Scenario re Epstein: 1. Mainstream (and as of yet unproven) assumption is that Epstein files prove much broader criminality than what is publicly demonstrated. 2. MAGA especially believes this as dogma. 3. Trump admin has lied about files numerous times. If
5
2
78
