JetSetGent
@JetSetGent
Followers
464
Following
229
Media
95
Statuses
5K
Entrepreneur. World traveler. Pilot. Skier. Sailor. Hopeless romantic.
New York, NY
Joined December 2015
Just send the Marines already.
Maduro is NOT the President of Venezuela and his regime is NOT the legitimate government. Maduro is the head of the Cartel de Los Soles, a narco-terror organization which has taken possession of a country. And he is under indictment for pushing drugs into the United States.
2
1
14
Or maybe it’s because he knows there should be no real references but he wants to find all the fake ones the democrats could have inserted.
So now we find out Trump had one thousand FBI agents look through the Epstein files to find all the references to his name. Dude is guilty as a MF.
19
0
12
For all the idiots blabbering how @realDonaldTrump’s reluctance to release Epstein files means there is something in there he wants to hide, a reminder that Trump was adamantly against releasing his tax returns too - and when they leaked, there was nothing remotely concerning.
15
0
12
When Epstein files finally come out and there is nothing of substance in them, all the idiots who are hysterically demanding these files will look like complete morons. Bookmark this.
7
0
8
Excellent answer by Grok. The danger in releasing Epstein materials is only some of the people in his orbit were involved in the abuse, and there is no way to tell for sure who was and who wasn’t.
@JetSetGent @ChaotiX_MN @elonmusk @ClashTrackerME @unusual_whales Yes, it's possible. Epstein hosted legitimate events, like a 2006 science conference with physicists including Stephen Hawking, where no illicit involvement is alleged. Some visitors, like Bill Gates, cited business discussions and later expressed regret. However, the island's.
2
0
3
This is EXACTLY what I said all along. There is no “list”, never been one. What exists is a bunch of accusations, many unsubstantiated, made against various people during investigations. No one is entitled to see those accusations unless they are charged with a crime.
Former Epstein Attorney Alan Dershowitz says there is no “client list” technically, but actually a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers which is being suppressed by a judge and that none of the names are of public figures currently in office but they do include former elected
1
0
3
This is an excellent example of the issues with Epstein files. They may contain tons of false/unsubstantiated acquisitions that cannot, and should not be released.
@SurveyDoesntSay @Butch_1776 @BlackJackPartII Example:. Someone calls the FBI. Caller says Epstein victim told Caller that Celebrity A raped her. Victim refuses to testify. Unsubstantiated. Triple-hearsay. Not subject to cross-examination or rebuttal evidence. But it would permanently destroy Celebrity A, if released.
2
0
2
Honestly, I don’t understand this whole obsession with Epstein files. We have rogue judges trying to derail Trump’s agenda. We have ICE agents being shot at. We have huge budget deficits. We have wars in Ukraine and the Middle East. And we are worrying about what some old.
8
0
4
Looky here…. Great minds think alike? 😉.
Hmmm, great minds think alike? 😉.
1
0
8
RT @JetSetGent: Now that @elonmusk brought up a new party - here is how we do it. It’s very hard to stand up a party that would be competi….
0
1
0
Hmmm, great minds think alike? 😉.
One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts. Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.
0
0
2
Newsom going on offense with Trump is about as funny as chihuahua barking at Great Dane. Lots of noise, but not very effective 🤣.
Eric Swalwell: Newsom is going on offense with Trump, like I do:. “Bullies only respond to one language, and it's the language of strength."
8
0
6
Now that @elonmusk brought up a new party - here is how we do it. It’s very hard to stand up a party that would be competitive in presidential elections, and we risk splitting the republican vote and helping democrats win. What we CAN do however is to run a few strong.
11
1
9
I am a big supporter of both @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk. But if I have to choose between the two, I am going with Elon.
7
0
0
Public service announcement 📣 . If you reply to a post by saying that it is dumb, but do not provide any specific reasoning as to how you arrived to this conclusion, you are the dumb one.
13
1
14
Ok, let’s test everyone’s Jeopardy skills. Can you solve the puzzle? 😜
6
0
11
I think we made a big mistake with tariffs. The mistake was we didn’t impose them 20 years earlier.
17
0
16
A lot of people seem to think that “special government employee” status was something that @realDonaldTrump just made up for @elonmusk, but it’s entirely not true. This is actually an official status established by US law long time ago. It is also.
2
0
3
See, we don’t think that business we don’t agree with need to be burned down, we just boycott them. We are not the same.
Why does MAGA give a shit about what happens to Tesla?. Less than 6 months ago it was “Woke” to own an EV. Fucking sheep.
22
0
7