@Greenpeace
Greenpeace International
3 years
Nuclear is not a 'green' energy source. Giving dangerous #NuclearEnergy a green label in the EU taxonomy will make the waste problem worse and actively divert investments away from real solutions like energy savings, energy storage and renewables. #COP26
781
145
377

Replies

@DanielHowley8
Daniel Howley
3 years
@Greenpeace Besides its intractable hazardous waste disposal problem - nuclear power plants invite terrorism - the last thing that France needs. Safe energy storage in a system where energy from the splits water into oxygen and hydrogen gas wouldn't need batteries.
23
0
4
@lanceatienza_
Lance Atienza
3 years
@Greenpeace @Greenpeace please know the difference of what you're talking about! So you're okay to utilise the big nuclear reactor up in the sky, but not what is alrrady available here on Earth? What a BS thing to say.
Tweet media one
6
4
44
@BTCGandalf
Daniel Sempere Pico
3 years
@Greenpeace Absolute scammers.
1
0
48
@colemaktypo
orange point
3 years
@Greenpeace You are an enemy of all living people if you reject nuclear.
1
0
14
@BitcoinIsSaving
Bitcoin is Saving
3 years
@Greenpeace Nuclear is a blue energy source
Tweet media one
1
1
48
@BartlettChrisJ
Chris Bartlett (クリス・バートレット)
3 years
@Greenpeace Is the world going to be destroyed by climate change and therefore we must make very tough decisions, or isn't it? If the former, nuclear is a better option by orders of magnitude than attempting to return to a low energy economy requiring huge suffering and control to implement.
0
0
7
@NimoNuts
Nimo
3 years
@Greenpeace Shameful - get your facts straight! The consequences of the world staying dependent on fossil fuels due to need for stable energy supply 365/24/7 is devastating for peoples health & our climate. The Only stable, clean and safe alternative is nuclear. GP knows better- shameful
0
0
1
@TTrevethan
Tom Trevethan
3 years
@Greenpeace Campaigning against nuclear power prevents you from being taken seriously regarding climate change. It makes it seem that you don't really consider it (climate change) to be that big of a deal, at least not urgent enough to make you rationally asses solutions.
0
0
1
@FeralPHunter
𝔽eral ℙawg ℍunter
3 years
@Greenpeace greenpeace more like greenshit
0
0
2
@ArmandDoma
Armand Domalewski
3 years
Tweet media one
0
0
1
@Liv_Boeree
Liv Boeree
3 years
@Greenpeace Yes, it is. This kind of puritanical nonsense is so damaging it makes me think you guys *want* climate change to happen. And to think I used to donate to you lol.
0
0
20
@EMcArdleInvest
Eric McArdle
3 years
@Greenpeace Embarrassing and revealing take
0
0
0
@Linda72849969
Linda
3 years
@Greenpeace I so totally agree, it is in the same breath as plastic! How can they justify the pollution will need places to store the waste product! 😠🆘🌍🌎🌏🆘
8
0
1
@FactTruthReal
ReasonableBeing
3 years
@Greenpeace Had Greenpeace supported nuclear years ago, the world would be in a far better position today. Instead their approach to defining ‘green’, combined with a poor understanding of the complexity in transitioning industry has resulted in destruction to the environment.
1
2
106
@Spartacus_HODL
SpartacusHODL 🟠🌋⚡💊
3 years
0
0
3
@sdw
Sebastiaan de With
3 years
@Greenpeace I was such a huge believer in your organization as a kid. I cannot even express in words how disappointing and short sighted this stance is as we stand on the precipice of global climate collapse. Do better.
2
12
477
@tabuteau
Pierre Tab
3 years
@Greenpeace Fake news
0
0
0
@strasak_cyril
//Cyril
3 years
@Greenpeace Rád zasdílím. Díky
0
0
0
@janihau77
jani hautaluoma 🇫🇮 Mäntsälän biokaasulla
3 years
@Greenpeace Hopefully you have good calculations available how is possible to replace fossil fuels without nuclear
0
0
0
@aprender_bolsa
James | BPP⚡️
3 years
0
0
0