EivindY Profile Banner
Eivind Ystrøm Profile
Eivind Ystrøm

@EivindY

Followers
802
Following
2K
Media
14
Statuses
928

Professor, UiO. Associate Editor @TheJCPPadvances. PI Neighbourhood Genetics @PromentaC. PI of ERC GeoGen, @forskningsradet ELiSE, and partner @ESSGNetwork

Professor of Psychology
Joined October 2012
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
2 months
Two birds of a gene - catch Matt Keller's webinar at @UniOslo on October 15th. Please share https://t.co/54txyET0fN @ESSGNetwork
sv.uio.no
Guest lecture by Matt Keller
1
0
1
@dr_appie
Abdel Abdellaoui
2 months
The largest study on late life virginity, based on > 400k individuals, out now in @PNASNews Open access link: https://t.co/v9FsYzaOqg Shoutout to shared first author @laurawesseldijk ❤️ Thread below 👇🏽
21
110
664
@Prebens
Preben Aavitsland
3 months
@AlecLuhn @ikhurshudyan What also got you out, I guess, was the hundred rescuers (mostly volunteers), dogs and helicopters that were searching for you during terrible weather and in the end fortunately located you and air-lifted you to hospital.
3
1
11
@thaliaeley
Prof Thalia Eley 💙
4 months
Delighted to be hiring a new Clinical Psychology Lecturer to come and join our vibrant environment @SGDPCentreKCL @KingsIoPPN @KingsCollegeLon Please retweet! https://t.co/LHiK7lgExV
0
11
15
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
14/🧵 This work was made possible through collaboration with Espen Moen Eilertsen, @hfsunde, Thomas Haarklau Kleppestø, and Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski. @UniOslo #PROMENTA #FHI @ESSGNetwork
0
0
6
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
13/🧵 We’ve made our correlation data publicly available so other researchers can fit and evaluate alternative models. We hope this contributes to a more nuanced understanding of why relatives resemble each other on socially relevant outcomes.
1
0
12
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
12/🧵 The models particularly underestimated similarity between monozygotic twins, maternal relatives, relatives-in-law, and relatives through adoption - suggesting additional mechanisms beyond additive genetics are at play.
1
0
11
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
11/🧵 Technical detail: We fitted models based on Fisher’s work, which assumes family resemblance arises solely from additive genetic effects and assortative mating. These models describe much of our data well but systematically underestimate similarity for certain relatives.
1
0
9
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
10/🧵 We used Norwegian national standardized tests that measure ‘fundamental abilities in reading, math and English that are important for learning across all subjects’.
1
0
7
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
9/🧵 The correlations between relatives decrease as they become more distant, but at a slower rate than would be expected under random mating. This pattern is consistent with substantial assortative mating on traits related to educational performance.
1
0
14
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
8/🧵 Our findings challenge both extreme positions in the nature-nurture debate: they contradict claims that family resemblance is entirely genetic, but also refute suggestions that genetics play only a minimal role in educational outcomes.
1
1
24
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
7/🧵 When we included relatives-in-law in our models, heritability estimates dropped from 0.80 to 0.50, while the estimated genetic correlation between partners increased from 0.23 to 0.43.
1
1
9
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
6/🧵 Adoptive siblings showed correlations of ~0.15, much lower than biological siblings (~0.50) but still significant. This provides clear evidence for familial environmental contributions to educational outcomes.
1
0
16
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
5/🧵 Interesting pattern: Maternal relatives (sharing the same mother) consistently showed higher correlations than paternal relatives. This was most pronounced for half-siblings but also appeared in cousins, suggesting maternal environmental effects.
2
0
15
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
4/🧵 Monozygotic twins showed remarkably high correlations (~0.85) compared to dizygotic twins and siblings (~0.50), suggesting nonadditive genetic effects or gene-environment interplay beyond what simple additive genetic models predict.
1
0
14
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
3/🧵 Key finding: Purely genetic models (with assortative mating) explain biological relatives well (R²=0.99) but fail when including relatives-in-law (R²=0.87). This suggests environmental factors also play an important role in educational outcomes.
1
0
14
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
2/🧵 He identified 82 different categories of relatives - not just siblings and cousins, but also relatives-in-law, adoptive relatives, and relatives connected through twins. This dataset allowed us to test whether family resemblance is due to genetics.
1
0
11
@EivindY
Eivind Ystrøm
5 months
1/🧵 Even more nature-nurture for school performance in @PNASNews! Nikolai Eftedal examined family resemblance in school performance in nearly 1 million students across their Norwegian relatives.
Tweet card summary image
pnas.org
We investigate the hypothesis that family resemblance on school performance can be fully explained by additive genetic effects and assortative mati...
4
28
111