RT @NLSJ_NLSIU: For the next article on Vol. 17(2) of the NLSJ, @vanarayan26 & @jahnavi_sindhu critique the reasonable classification test….

RT @singhharushi: I write for @thewire_in on how premier legal institutions can do more for students with disabilities. .

RT @ppratishruti: I write for @TheHinduComment on the constitutional importance of the right to default bail, and how the SC's willingness….

RT @daksh_india: We are thrilled to announce the launch of our new book, "Constitutional Ideals: Development and Realisation Through Court-….

RT @singhharushi: Long Thread. I remember when I secured admission in NLIU, Bhopal back in 2008. CLAT had just been introduced that year an….

RT @neet_tweeting: A child spent TWENTY-FIVE years on death row!! And, let us not be under any illusion that Narayan's case is an outlier.….

Readers looking to know more about why the UAPA is understood be a draconian legislation in the first place may also find this comprehensive report from 2012 on the Act helpful:.

Apart from Sekhri's analysis, another excellent and detailed critique of the judgment has been written by Mihir Desai, which may be found here:

Our piece refers to the analysis of @abhinavsekhri10. Unfortunately, The Quint does not allow external links on its pages. Readers may find Sekhri's analysis here:

I write with @jahnavi_sindhu about the flaws in the recent SC judgment interpreting S.10(a)(i) of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, arguing that it renders the Act even more draconian and threatens to have a grave chilling effect on free speech and freedom of association.

RT @VrindaBhandari: Super excited to announce the launch event of our report on Section144 CrPC this Sunday at the IIC from 3-4:30 pm. The….

RT @IndianLawReview: We are looking for Associate and Assistant Editors to join our team! . If you are a law graduate interested in contri….

RT @apar1984: On Republic day, the blocking of the BBC documentary leaves us to ask a wider question: where do we place free debate and exp….

RT @Johanna_Deeksha: I went back to speak to the Muslim students affected by the hijab ban. With every interview, I was fuming more and mor….

RT @jahnavi_sindhu: Wrote on the Demonetisation verdict with @vanarayan26. The majority verdict exemplifies a trend of the court finding th….

RT @TheQuint: #Opinion | Reasoning of majority boils down to the idea that statute must be interpreted so as to ensure expanded power in ha….

RT @glorious_gluten: This report is the result of a year long labour of a team of primarily Bahujan researchers to uncover the spectre of c….

RT @jahnavi_sindhu: I write with @vanarayan26 on the split verdict in the Hijab ban case. We examine the vast diffe….