RT @erindolan1: Had a great time discussing our research on mentoring with Kim Klonowski and David Peterson on the People, Parasites, and P….

RT @mariel_pfeifer: We're in the news! I'm super excited to have the chance to collaborate with Dr. Stephanie Berg on this research. Stay t….

RT @mariel_pfeifer: Happy this article is out in the world! @chasingariel.

RT @DrMarissaKate: My face when universities tell PhD students to come to a yoga class to reduce stress instead of paying them a reasonable….

RT @kt_duval: She’s finally out ✨.

RT @TsaiLabUGA: Finally out! A long journey w/ many setbacks over a decade. Frustrating growth variation of hiSA transgenics led to a COOL….

RT @CBELifescied: From LSE.@triple_tuma & @erindolan1 examine the influence of variables theorized to predict mentorship support and qualit….

Very excited for our new paper! Our work demonstrates the utility of CRISPR for advancing our understanding of carbohydrate utilization in trees and how these processes may be influenced in an increasingly changing climate 🌳🌳🌳 @UGAWarnell @TsaiLabUGA.

Woohoo! See you soon #SABER2024.

RT @AdamMGrant: Hey managers: to keep your people, let them work from home 2 days a week. Landmark experiment (1600+ ppl, 2yrs): random as….

Usually we assume that mentorship is beneficial, but our results show that some mentoring relationships can lead to negative consequences that harm students' undergraduate and career trajectories.

Undergrads who experienced greater negative mentoring reported lower scientific self-efficacy, science identity, research task values, and had lower intentions to pursue a scientific career!.

We found undergrads experience both an absence of supportive mentoring and destructive mentoring experiences. In general, negative mentoring experiences are less common, but they can have a big impact.

Very excited to be apart of this paper with @erindolan1 @LimeriLisa and to see this multi year project in print! If you are interested in undergrad mentorship quality, you should use this measure!! Our robust survey is freely available in @CBELifescied.

@theNASEM @insidehighered @STEMequality @NRMNET.

Our results provide some of the most robust evidence to date on how to match graduate students and faculty mentors to promote effective mentoring relationships. We discuss these implications and a number of directions for future research in the paper! 7/7.

We found that mentees who shared attitudes, values, & beliefs with their mentor & whose mentors displayed greater cultural awareness experienced quality mentorship. Pairing students & faculty who share personal qualities may be more critical than matching based on demographics 6/.

Contrary to popular belief, gender, racial, & ethnic similarity between mentees and mentors were also not associated with greater mentorship quality. These trends were also largely consistent across all tested demographic groups. 5/.

Our results showed that neither mentor career stage nor mentee capital predicted higher quality mentorship. Rotations vs. direct admissions also had no influence on mentorship. 4/.

We studied the mentoring experiences of 565 science doc students from 70 universities in the U.S. and examined the variables associated with effective and high-quality mentoring relationships. 3/.