hopefully crypto can move away from this elon shit in 2023

imagining how quiet CT would be if twitter blocked you from tagging more than three people in a single tweet

stupidity scales with reach. as such, mario has very quickly made himself known as one of the dumbest assholes in this space

There are functions in scam contracts that can let the deployer control who sends the contract’s tokens (or just make it look like they did), no matter what the addresses are

The former could have been done by anyone, because you can set the recipient of a uniswap tx to any wallet other than the sender, but the latter was almost definitely performed by the contract deployer, as it spoofs a send from the ftx drainer wallet to the Ukraine wallet

Here is the spoofed “CRO Next” tx, in which someone bought .1 ETH of this token and set the recipient for the tx to the ftx drainer wallet: https://t.co/j3FQvheib0 And here is the spoof Ukraine tx, also for the CRO Next erc20 token https://t.co/jdubyaHmuU

Well I guess I hesitate to say this is the biggest problem, but it’s certainly the biggest one when something huge is actually happening. They’re the first to run their mouths about wild bullshit made-up scenarios to their frightened audiences of millions

If your chain analysts can’t identify a spoofed erc20 tx, guess what? They’re not chain analysts!!!!!

This is the guy running those endless FTX-related Twitter spaces. This is the biggest problem with this space: traders and investors speaking out of turn about code and tech

zero evidence

the only evidence currently available at the moment is that which is on-chain. And if you’re having trouble understanding that, reconsider investing so deeply in this sector until you do!

The whole situation is obviously very fluid and very fucked up, but stop believing every harebrained technical theory invented by professional day traders who know fuck all about cybersecurity

Speculation about the types of hacks being performed on the website are also insane and totally baseless at the moment. Talks of 0days, session hijacking, and craziest of all, the claim that the app can be updated to give the hacker root access. False until proven otherwise imo

Maintain skepticism about the veracity of the “hack” claims. The basis for nearly all “””reporting””” is this community admin post in the official FTX telegram channel. Note that his citations are a tweet saying “rumors of a hack at ftx”, and another tweet from AutismCapital.

how many times has the notorious inu contract been “audited” at this point? Five hundred? these auditing companies have got it made

write the contract for the proposal, verify it so everyone in the dao can read it, and then execute the contract based on on-chain vote results. like do ANY daos do this?

whenever I hear about dao drama it’s always that the dao voted and then the project owners didn’t do what was voted for. this is what smart contracts are literally designed for. Why is the outcome of the vote not contractual (pre-coded)? I legit don’t get it

how did goerli go from the "oh yeah, and goerli" afterthought testnet to this? is this compensation for years of community neglect?

wtf i love rinkeby

its pretty funny that gas golfers went so insane on opensea's new seaport contract that devs are like "maybe we should consider using a different language"