Why we follow Great Men An answer to self-proclaimed self-thinkers who don't tire of calling us "cucks" for quoting and referencing past geniuses. ⬇️URL⬇️

Of course leftists never realized that feeling pity for a tortured horse doesn't contradict Nietzsche's works. Pity can't be controlled, you can't choose to feel it. But you can build your morality around it - and that is what Nietzsche protested against. A society that abolishes

The "Nietzsche hugged a horse" story is the first of many bizarre leftist revenge porn stories against him. Another one is the novel "The Sea-Wolf", in which an Übermensch-like captain goes blind and is then dependent on the good will of his former ship mates.

Though the genealogy is quite funny. Richard Wagner was a great admirer of Schopenhauer and sent him his draft of Ring des Nibelungen. Schopenhauer disliked it. Tolkien, in turn, was very likely inspired by Wagner, although he denied that.

Would Schopenhauer have liked the Lord of the Rings? I doubt it. Moralistic stories aren't classical - they emerged during the 19th century, during romanticism. Before that, (psychological) tragedies were considered the highest art.

Such religious babble gets hit with the uniqueness-denying Nolte-stare.

One thing I find pretty disgusting about Americans is that the vast majority are atheists by either self-identification or behavior, but every single one is eager to take on the country preacher attitude and start inveighing about how their political enemies will burn in hell.

Tolkeinslop: preservation of the status quo; mere domestic life of a hobbit in an underhill longhouse; Saruman's Faustian drive portrayed as evil Martin's magnum opus: "the human heart in conflict with itself"; a Great Russian Novel placed in fantasy setting

Yeah, well, it's a stupid answer. Power can only be expressed against other power and obstacles. The truly powerful delights in opposition, which is why the Romans never imposed their universal rules on their subjects.

I was name dropped 🥹

My case for why Lord of the Rings is LEFT-WING: - There is a good-evil dichotomy. This is an absolute truth from the outset. Tolkien obviously took this from Christianity, which sabotaged real European psychology. Before Christianity, no one in Europe judged in terms of good and

We should occupy Weimar and turn it into another city of fire, like Fiume. I propose BAP as Duce. Read The Fire and the Sea btw.

I remember when some guest of his introduced the eternal recurrence to Joe Rogan. Rogan, being the orc that he is, couldn't understand why there was no "learning experience" involved. He was scared of that thought experiment.

"Quite interesting that I attack Tolkien and months later Fuentard starts copying me. Am I the Weltgeist, after all?"

It's a stupid and literal visualization of a letter of Nietzsche to Jacob Burckhardt, where he wrote: "I've been two times to my own burial." Nietzsche should have a towering sculpture on some mountain top, in perpetual sunlight and ice-cold winds.

This is what you'll look like if you believe in cooperation over competition.

Nietzschean amoralists when they accidentally step on a bee

This image is inaccurate because the woman on the right isn't an overweight, crows-footed, brown-skinned, slant-eyed grazing animal, which is the modal reproductive partner for mere life in all of human history.

https://t.co/YmnvnlwRjZ

Few will get this:

Understandable. The best you can do as a German founder of business is to just create it in the USA. That's at least viable if you don't need to directly produce goods.