UW MetaScience Research Lab
@research_uw
Followers
78
Following
170
Media
1
Statuses
105
The nexus for research on the Science of Science, Science Policy, and Scientometrics. Founded by Profs. @ChaoqunNi and @HutchinsBI
Madison, WI
Joined February 2022
Metascience Research Lab @research_uw @UWMadiSchool @ChaoqunNi @HutchinsBI is excited to host Dr. Dakota Murray @dakotasmurray from @NUnetsi for his talk "Towards a data-driven understanding of scientific debate!" Please RSVP if you are interested!.
docs.google.com
- Date/Time: 10/07/2024(Mon), 12:30pm - 1:30pm - Venue: Zoom - Speaker: Dr. Dakota Murray (Network Science Institute at Northeastern University) Title: Towards a data-driven understanding of scient...
0
2
5
RT @ChaoqunNi: UW-Madison's iSchool is hiring up to two tenured positions this year! Please apply! #nlp #emnlp2023 #NLProc #LLM #AACL2023 #….
0
11
0
RT @UWMadiSchool: Gender inequality is real in the scientific community, and iSchool Assistant Professor Chaoqun Ni (@ChaoqunNi) has illust….
ischool.wisc.edu
Whenever there’s breaking news about gender disparity in the workplace, iSchool Assistant Professor Chaoqun Ni is rarely surprised. She has made gender disparity, particularly in academia in STEM...
0
4
0
RT @UWiscResearch: Machine learning analysis of research citations highlights importance of federal funding for basic scientific research h….
news.wisc.edu
Researchers found patterns to help identify the citations that were more likely to be important to each piece of published science.
0
4
0
RT @HutchinsBI: Federally funded basic research punches above its weight at informing later clinical studies #NIH.
0
3
0
RT @HutchinsBI: Many scientists suspect that they do not receive enough recognition for their influential studies, and now we have data to….
biorxiv.org
During career advancement and funding allocation decisions in biomedicine, reviewers have traditionally depended on journal-level measures of scientific influence like the impact factor. Prestigious...
0
3
0
RT @jcamthrash: You do not receive enough recognition for your influential science
biorxiv.org
During career advancement and funding allocation decisions in biomedicine, reviewers have traditionally depended on journal-level measures of scientific influence like the impact factor. Prestigious...
0
2
0
RT @OKaneCahir: “approximately half of researchers never publish in a venue with an impact factor above 15, which may exclude them from opp….
0
5
0
RT @GeneticsMike7: Are 90% of researchers who publish high impact work overlooked simply because of the journals they publish in? 😳 https:/….
biorxiv.org
During career advancement and funding allocation decisions in biomedicine, reviewers have traditionally depended on journal-level measures of scientific influence like the impact factor. Prestigious...
0
2
0
RT @SchlisioSusanne: interesting read: You do not receive enough recognition for your influential science.
0
2
0
RT @DanielMMerritt: This is an interesting analysis of (in a sense) how good journals are at spotting influential papers.
0
2
0
RT @Dr_Perreault: "Chosen journal-level measures (IF) that are routinely considered under decision-making norms may recognize as little as….
biorxiv.org
During career advancement and funding allocation decisions in biomedicine, reviewers have traditionally depended on journal-level measures of scientific influence like the impact factor. Prestigious...
0
3
0
RT @drpeterrodgers: This work by @ChaoqunNi, @lariviev, @csugimoto and others has just been published as a #ReviewedPreprint in @eLife.http….
0
3
0
RT @ZebrafishGroup: "During career advancement and funding allocation decisions in biomedicine, reviewers have traditionally depended on jo….
0
2
0
RT @aemonten: It's not that they have "depened" on it. Funding agencies and hiring and P&T committees have actively (and repeatedly) chosen….
0
4
0
RT @Marek_Kwiek: Interesting!. "We find that approximately half of researchers never publish in a venue with an impact factor above 15, whi….
biorxiv.org
During career advancement and funding allocation decisions in biomedicine, reviewers have traditionally depended on journal-level measures of scientific influence like the impact factor. Prestigious...
0
3
0
RT @biorxivpreprint: You do not receive enough recognition for your influential science #bioRxiv.
biorxiv.org
During career advancement and funding allocation decisions in biomedicine, reviewers have traditionally depended on journal-level measures of scientific influence like the impact factor. Prestigious...
0
9
0