
eric provencher
@pvncher
Followers
18K
Following
81K
Media
380
Statuses
10K
I've long said that o3 is the best coding model - but if you're using an agent harness - Claude is just better at navigating your codebase. Enter the @RepoPrompt pair programmer mode - it's the best of both words, as Claude coordinates with o3 to plan and apply edits for you!
22
18
302
Just released @RepoPrompt 1.3.44.- Big update to tool efficiency when managing file selection or fetching codemaps - recursive directory operations now work!.- Massively improved server stability .- apply_edits is now much more useful for non-code usecases too!.
1
6
83
GPT-5 Pro just wrote me “a deterministic, high-signal fuzz suite” of tests for a utility in @RepoPrompt. Holy shit.
10
2
98
RT @steipete: Building a new feature, I let Opus 4.1 pair program with GPT-5 High via @RepoPrompt . Opus directs, GPT-5 implements, Gemini….
0
19
0
None of this applies to gpt 5 pro btw. It is the goat of models.
Gpt5 is arguably a worse vibe coding model than Claude, even if it can write better code. I think if this trend continues, it’s going to be increasingly challenging to prompt these models directly. We’re going to need some intent clarification pipelines.
6
1
68
I think one reason this setup is so powerful with gpt 5, is that it’s so hard to prompt it with short vague instructions. Claude code does great with that though and translates your intent to gpt5 and the @RepoPrompt chat keeps it focused in the provided context.
Claude Code alone is no longer sufficient. RepoPrompt, GPT 5 (Thinking Hard) + Claude Opus 4.1 cannot be beat. But here's the deal - I still need to use Claude Code Opus 4.1 as the driver and GPT 5 in @RepoPrompt as the Pair Programmer. Why is this beating my Zen MCP Pair
1
0
22
If you're prompting GPT-5, it will interpret your words LITERALLY. Be specific, or have another model interpret your meaning first.
@altryne The biggest thing is avoiding ambiguity in your prompt. Being specific is more important than ever.
9
4
126
Demo of the setup (using o3).
I've long said that o3 is the best coding model - but if you're using an agent harness - Claude is just better at navigating your codebase. Enter the @RepoPrompt pair programmer mode - it's the best of both words, as Claude coordinates with o3 to plan and apply edits for you!
1
0
10
Ive been running the same setup - its really powerful!. It takes some getting used to, because you have to learn to prompt it, but it’s insanely powerful having opus check gpt5’s work, and iteratively prompt it through a complex task.
Claude Code alone is no longer sufficient. RepoPrompt, GPT 5 (Thinking Hard) + Claude Opus 4.1 cannot be beat. But here's the deal - I still need to use Claude Code Opus 4.1 as the driver and GPT 5 in @RepoPrompt as the Pair Programmer. Why is this beating my Zen MCP Pair
6
9
65
This is what happens when you don’t optimize the context window of each message sent. You can send 500 messages in @RepoPrompt’s chat and the model will have perfect clarity over all attached files.
It's astounding how quickly LLMs fall off track. Within say 20 messages about some medical test results, it's telling me completely different stuff that isn't even in the test results. Seems to happen across almost all of the major LLMs right now.
1
0
29
This flow feels really overpowered right now. Gpt5 being carefully steered by Claude opus 4.1 is such a powerful combo!.
I've long said that o3 is the best coding model - but if you're using an agent harness - Claude is just better at navigating your codebase. Enter the @RepoPrompt pair programmer mode - it's the best of both words, as Claude coordinates with o3 to plan and apply edits for you!
12
9
150
RT @PopVerseYT: Gotta praise something over here. @RepoPrompt from @pvncher is I N S A N E. Improved SO MUCH my context usage when workin….
0
2
0