Does tokenization make “who sees what data” a core design problem? Tokenization can reinvent finance, but only if access to data is designed, not improvised. As RWAs move on-chain, they drag KYC, risk and reporting with them. Without programmable privacy and decentralized

Copying your address is easy now. Next step: wallets where the key never lives in one place. That’s Multi-Party Computation done right.

Blockchains have been live for more than a decade. The hard part is letting real world data in without giving it away. The question is not which chain wins. It is who controls the data that proves who you are and what you are allowed to do. On Partisia Blockchain, MPC keeps

Early ecosystems rise on the culture they set, not the noise they make. People stay where the builders are aligned, the users are informed and the value is tangible. Clear outcomes create gravity. If a network wants real adoption, it has to earn it through the environment it

Ethereum does still expose your whole balance sheet by default, so @Bankless is not wrong. Most serious users either shard their activity across many wallets or push the real flows off-chain. #kohaku is a real step forward per app accounts, stealth style destinations, less

The pressure points are easy to miss. A transaction that needs one extra approval. A cross-border transfer tangled in intermediaries. A digital interaction that asks for everything instead of only what is needed. Individually they seem small, together they slow everything down.

Tokenization is not 1996 internet. It is the moment right before the browser. The potential is clear, but the system is still missing the piece that makes everything inevitable. In 1996 the internet already had pull. Email worked. Search worked. Commerce was taking shape. People

Strong growth for such a short timeline. It makes sense that most of it leans toward dollar-pegged stablecoins because that’s where people see the least risk today. The open question is whether USD-pegged models stay dominant or if real alternatives emerge. And if new

If the SEC is reviewing tokenization with firms like Coinbase and BlackRock, the debate is shifting. We’re past arguing about whether tokenized assets fit the rules. The real conversation now will probably be how the existing rulebook applies when issuance, custody and

What idOS shows here is the real strength of MPC! Keys generated with high-entropy, split into independent shares, and only reassembled when the user signs. It feels seamless, but the security model underneath is what makes user-controlled identity actually viable at scale.

Confidential computing is quietly deciding who runs the next decade of digital infrastructure. Most stacks are still built as if nothing has changed, even as budgets shift toward data in use. Analysts expect it to grow from about $9B today to roughly $115B by 2030. Capital is

Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (MPC, ZK, TEEs, FHE etc.) should be judged on a simple question: Do they reduce what needs to be exposed and reduce how much everyone has to guess? If the answer is no, it is not privacy tech. It is just a darker room.

The fundamentals are solid. ZK is built for single-party proofs. MPC lets multiple parties compute without exposing anything. Where things usually break is in the real world. Generic MPC slows down and depends on everyone behaving. We use the same cryptography but surround it

Ecosystem Update. Our latest Community Call covered the current state of the network, ongoing product work, and updates from partners now live on mainnet. Highlights: • Network performance and activity • Execution Engine usage across live projects • Updates from Sceptre,

The digital world is getting louder, but the most important shift is quiet. People are starting to realise that the real value of a system isn’t how much it collects, but how well it understands what should never be collected in the first place. You can see it in small moments,

Interesting vision. Privacy keeps coming up for a reason. It’s the missing layer, we didn't think was important. Once we can separate secrecy from real confidentiality and prove what’s needed without exposing everything, the idea of an ‘AI bank’ becomes practical instead of

Privacy preservation in digital health is a problem. Not because the data is sensitive, but because the architecture still treats duplication as normal. Hospitals, labs, insurers, apps… each one takes its own full copy. It feels harmless until you look closely. Entire medical

Does mandatory doxxing strengthen trust or erode it?

Is your ID private and portable? Are your staked assets truly liquid? Is your key management seamless? For most systems, the answer is no. What’s missing is simple: Private identity that works as reusable, privacy-preserving credentials. Liquid staking that functions as

11/ If you want a real view of where PBC is going, do not stop at this thread. Open the apps. Move between them. Ask questions in the communities. Pay attention to what feels rough as much as what feels polished. Ecosystems are not built by announcements. They are built by