nathanlents Profile Banner
Nathan H. Lents Profile
Nathan H. Lents

@nathanlents

Followers
2K
Following
2K
Media
870
Statuses
6K

🏳️‍🌈Scientist, Author, Professor Follow me: @nathanlents.bsky.social Research: Genetics, Evolution, Anthro, Forensics New Book: The Sexual Evolution

New York, NY
Joined August 2014
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@nathanlents
Nathan H. Lents
8 months
Thank you to @ScienceMagazine for this review of The Sexual Evolution. Gratifying, validating, and thrilling. Centuries of biology research has taught us that variation and variety are central themes of life. Why? Because DIVERSITY WINS! https://t.co/zqZNLn1QZk
5
9
17
@Anthrofuentes
AgustĂ­n Fuentes
8 days
Beyond the Binary: The Compounding Complexity of Biological Sex Sex in nature is far more complex than a simple male–female divide, emerging instead as a diverse, overlapping continuum shaped by biology, development, and culture.
Tweet card summary image
prosocial.world
Sex in nature is far more complex than a simple male–female divide, emerging instead as a diverse, overlapping continuum shaped by biology, development, and culture.
2
7
15
@Anthrofuentes
AgustĂ­n Fuentes
9 days
New essay from @nathanlents and me in @ProSocialWorld -- “Beyond the Binary: The Compounding Complexity of Biological Sex” a mini 🧵
2
4
6
@center4inquiry
Center for Inquiry
2 months
In case anyone forgot, science isn’t a matter of opinion. @RichardDawkins, @LKrauss1, and @nathanlents remind us why in the latest @FreeInquiry: https://t.co/U5XgxMxQEx Belief doesn’t make facts optional.
0
5
9
@center4inquiry
Center for Inquiry
2 months
The Smithsonian was told to change its exhibits: humans and chimps are “only 85% alike.” The source? A creationist lawyer misreading supplementary data. The reality? ~99% similarity, confirmed again and again. From @nathanlents in @FreeInquiry: https://t.co/qRzLWIEf3d
2
4
12
@center4inquiry
Center for Inquiry
3 months
Creationists are cherry-picking data, mangling genetics, and even editing figures to fit their narrative. @nathanlents explains what’s really in the ape genome data, and why the Smithsonian is right. Read more in @FreeInquiry:
Tweet card summary image
secularhumanism.org
The Trump administration seems determined to gut the scientific research establishment in the United States. Despite the fact that vaccines have likely save ...
0
1
5
@CloserToTruth
Closer To Truth
3 months
We've changed our environments, but not our bodies and now we're studying the consequences. @nathanlents gets to the core of why these illnesses such as Type 2 Diabetes or lower back pain exist and why they require an evolutionary perspective.
0
2
4
@JustinLehmiller
Justin Lehmiller
3 months
Some argue that humans evolved for monogamy, while other argue that we evolved for non-monogamy. So which is it? Nathan Lents (@nathanlents), author of the new book The Sexual Evolution, is on the show today to dive into the debate.
Tweet card summary image
sexandpsychology.com
Are human beings made for monogamy or non-monogamy? This is a popular subject of debate, so let's dive into what the science says.
0
2
3
@center4inquiry
Center for Inquiry
4 months
A creationist with no training in genetics claims humans and chimps are only 85% similar. Genomicist @nathanlents says that’s not how any of this works. Read the full takedown in @FreeInquiry:
Tweet card summary image
secularhumanism.org
The Trump administration seems determined to gut the scientific research establishment in the United States. Despite the fact that vaccines have likely save ...
0
3
5
@FreeInquiry
Free Inquiry
4 months
ICYMI, we have posted online an excellent essay by @nathanlents demolishing a creationist's attack on a Smithsonian display. As a bonus, the essay provides a concise, perspicuous explanation of genetic similarity. A must read!
Tweet card summary image
secularhumanism.org
The Trump administration seems determined to gut the scientific research establishment in the United States. Despite the fact that vaccines have likely save ...
0
1
3
@nathanlents
Nathan H. Lents
4 months
When a professional internet troll remarks on someone else's "charm." LMAO
@d_klinghoffer
David Klinghoffer
4 months
Ah, Nathan Lents, the man that charm forgot.
1
0
2
@Anthrofuentes
AgustĂ­n Fuentes
4 months
Many institutions, programs, and individual scientists are stepping back from supporting the efforts to enhance diversity, equity and inclusion. Doing so is a mistake.
Tweet card summary image
science.org
Recently, I exchanged views with a prominent Ivy League scientist who was complaining about the minority students and junior faculty applying to his program. He claimed that the university, through...
1
5
15
@nathanlents
Nathan H. Lents
4 months
I had mostly moved on from debunking creationist claims, but this latest nonsense from Casey Luskin at @DiscoveryCSC is even stupider than usual, so they pulled me back in. #evolution #creationism #intelligentdesign https://t.co/jfekf7qUrg
1
0
2
@nathanlents
Nathan H. Lents
5 months
Tell me you don't have even a basic understanding of genomics without admitting you don't have even a basic understanding of genomics.
@d_klinghoffer
David Klinghoffer
5 months
Memo To The Smithsonian: Make Humans Exceptional Again https://t.co/bnKXufckik @realDailyWire
0
0
4
@SeanMoncrieff
SeĂĄnMoncrieff
5 months
On the show today: @nathanlents on gender-fluid animals; The summer solstice; Queer Glasnevin cemetary; Forgiving your son's murderer - the Opera; @LesliesWineFood with chinese wine; @SBellissimo with Showbiz News; @deirdremolumby reviews '28 Years Later' & 'Elio'
0
2
4
@nathanlents
Nathan H. Lents
6 months
Thanks for the shutout @RichardDawkins. You’ve written another lovely book and it was a pleasure to read and review. Cheers!
@RichardDawkins
Richard Dawkins
6 months
Brilliant review of The Genetic Book of the Dead, by @NathanLents in Free Inquiry, now under the predictably excellent Editorship of Ron Lindsay. Lents’s review is exactly what a review should be, going beyond the book to say things the author wishes he had thought of himself.
0
0
2
@FreeSoilAndrew
🦗New Free Soil Party
8 months
LOL so it's just completely fake
@nathanlents
Nathan H. Lents
8 months
Just to be clear, they did not de-extinct anything, and those are not Dire Wolves. Those are Gray Wolves with 20 genes edited to match the Dire Wolf versions of those genes. #DireWolves
2
2
4
@GreeneandHeaton
Greene & Heaton Literary and Media Agency
6 months
THE SEXUAL EVOLUTION by @nathanlents is out today with @canongatebooks! A perspective-altering and deeply researched journey through the history of sexuality and gender across the animal kingdom. https://t.co/IYAkVJRSzh
Tweet card summary image
canongate.co.uk
A perspective-altering and deeply researched journey through the history of sexuality and gender across the animal kingdom by forensic biologist and university professor Nathan H. Lents
0
1
1