mphulme Profile Banner
Patrick Hulme Profile
Patrick Hulme

@mphulme

Followers
573
Following
798
Media
11
Statuses
602

War Powers, U.S. Foreign Policy, Int'l Security | @ufhamilton 🐊 |@StanfordCISAC @AWConsortium @UCIGCC affiliate | former @BelferCenter @UCSDPoliSci @UCLA_Law

Gainesville, FL
Joined November 2016
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@mphulme
Patrick Hulme
5 months
Questions about how the “war powers” work in practice? Check out my piece in @apsrjournal. TL;DR President is far more constrained by Congress that usually realized.
@apsrjournal
American Political Science Review
5 months
Just published on APSR First View: War and Responsibility by M. PATRICK HULME (@mphulme ) https://t.co/0PndFiHsyy
6
24
63
@MichaelGoldfien
Michael Goldfien
18 days
Excited that my article, "To Agree or Not to Agree: Hawks, Doves, and Regime Type in International Rivalry and Rapprochement," is now out at @IntSecHarvard @mitpress. It is available to all here ( https://t.co/BSM702ntQN) or see the abstract below.
1
10
63
@mphulme
Patrick Hulme
19 days
Sen. Lindsey Graham says Pres. Trump to brief cong. leaders when back from Asia trip on Venez/ Carr. Strikes
0
0
0
@mphulme
Patrick Hulme
21 days
Ceasefire: Senators Coons and Lankford on U.S. Operations in Venezuela https://t.co/yE7u2dcnFj via @YouTube
0
0
1
@ey_985
Eddie Yang
26 days
Finding 2: This disagreement has significant downstream consequences. Re-running the original analyses with LLM annotations produced highly variable coefficient estimates, often altering the conclusions of the original studies.
1
2
9
@mphulme
Patrick Hulme
26 days
Eddie Yang et al. Doing really interesting replication work with LLMs. Check it out!
@ey_985
Eddie Yang
26 days
New paper: LLMs are increasingly used to label data in political science. But how reliable are these annotations, and what are the consequences for scientific findings? What are best practices? Some new findings from a large empirical evaluation. Paper: https://t.co/F8FlrsLbzM
1
0
2
@mphulme
Patrick Hulme
3 months
Paper here:
0
0
0
@mphulme
Patrick Hulme
3 months
In other words, in imbalance of power was more likely to lead to peace; "peace through strength" is not incorrect.
1
1
0
@mphulme
Patrick Hulme
3 months
Resolution, @notanastronomer, Erik Gartzke, and Alex Braithwaite show that once one takes distance and location into account, states are roughly 3X more likely to fight when power is balanced.
1
0
1
@mphulme
Patrick Hulme
3 months
New Pub Alert 🚨: Are states more likely to fight when there is a balance of power between them, or an imbalance of power? It's been a very long debate over decades, but one that has taken little account of WHERE states may fight. In our new paper in the Journal of Conflict
1
1
5
@KenealyAM
Andrew Kenealy
4 months
Trump has overridden a remarkable range of political norms. Yet Patrick and I show that, at least when it comes to bombing Iran, Trump largely did what Congress wanted. For better or for worse, there’s been overwhelming R and even some limited D support.
@mphulme
Patrick Hulme
4 months
Check out @KenealyAM and my new Lawfare piece using AI to measure lawmaker sentiment toward the Iran strikes last month. Punchline: more support than you might have imagined, both before and after.
1
2
3