🧵CHILD 'K': TO UNDERMINE A VOID In preparation for Lucy Letby's appeal hearing next week regarding Child 'K', I've written another article and accompanying thread about the case. This conviction is arguably the weakest of all, which I understand is quite the statement. I've

.@cjsnowdon. This is a very curious article, and its opening description of the attitudes of those who seek a reopening of the Letby case is a whole regiment of Straw Men. It is precisely the growing doubts of experts about the conviction that we have welcomed (and you have not)

PA Media is now reporting on next week's press conference by Lucy Letby's defence team. The panel will be chaired by Sir David Davis, and will reportedly present "the unanimous findings of independent analysis by 14 neonatal experts." https://t.co/hmeUmWMe2w

The Thirlwall Inquiry has just published a document put together by its legal team titled, "All of the Neonatal Deaths Linked to the Countess of Chester Hospital in 2015 and 2016" Link in the next tweet.

Why did Letby and her defence team call no expert witnesses? Having read the transcripts, both barristers were very aggressive. Ben Myers did everything he could to destroy the credibility of Dewi Evans on the stand, arguing that he was making up causes of death as he went along

⤵️ Here is my email to @LizTwistMP urging her to attend the parliamentary debate regarding the role of expert witnesses in the Letby trial on January 8th. I’m hoping that because PMQs is on the same day, we may see a good turnout. Fingers crossed! https://t.co/2M3CxDiMVK

The evolution of the prosecution position on Baby P’s liver haematoma. In their opening they accepted it was CPR. Marnerides said he couldn’t refute CPR, and didn’t have evidence to say it was an inflicted injury. By their closing speech they decide that Letby did it because

"More than 50 experts ready to defend Lucy Letby, says her lawyer" "'Any new trial—which I am sceptical there will be—we will have a line of expert witnesses. They are also ready to question the reliability of the evidence…at the first trial.'" https://t.co/izU5FrUTyJ

Daming indictment of the #LucyLetby investigation revealed in Private Eye. Better qualified experts than those who existed at the hospital or were used by the prosecution have described medical negligence on the part of the same Sr Dr's who accused Letby.

The 2015 inquest into the death of baby Noah Robinson in Chester could be highly relevant to the Letby case because it showed that the doctors struggled to intubate very small babies and to spot when the intubation had gone disastrously wrong. Could other intubation and

Huge week ahead at the Thirlwall Inquiry, with all the senior managers set to give evidence. Here is the opening statement submitted on behalf of the managers at the start of the inquiry: https://t.co/VVxExYurcH

Very interesting: in their May 2017 meeting with police, the consultants brought up concerns about a set of twins that Letby was never charged with harming. And yet we keep getting told that the babies that featured in the prosecution's infamous shift chart were the only ones

NEW from the @Telegraph: "Three of Lucy Letby's victims 'could have deaths explained by medical problems'" By @sarahknapton and me (yes, that's my byline alongside Knapton's) https://t.co/HdIZYEkFs9

Here are the witnesses scheduled to give evidence next week. Highlights: • Dr Ravi Jayaram – Consultant paediatrician & one of Lucy Letby's main accusers (alongside Dr Stephen Brearey, who gives evidence the following week). Jayaram testified at trial that he walked in on Letby

I hope the lawyers at the Thirlwall Inquiry ask Drs Ravi Jayaram & Stephen Brearey why they spent an entire year flat-out refusing to provide evidence substantiating their concerns about Letby, according to so many of the witnesses who have given evidence so far.

0/8 This is a thread on Baby C. I've posted most of this before in one form or another but this rounds it all up into 1 thread. Key Points: 1. Dr Dewi Evans changed his opinion about Baby C's cause of death, both before and during the trial (and after - see point 4). 2. The

I'm particularly intrigued to hear from Annette Weatherley & Dr Chris Green, who oversaw the investigation into Letby's HR complaint against the consultants. Dr Green's investigation led him to conclude that the accusatory consultants had probably lied. https://t.co/bBXWtYYGGz

Lucy Letby, once again denied an appeal, has been let down by a legal system that can't handle scientific evidence, says Timothy Bradshaw. Misleading 'expert' witnesses are treated as oracles and go unchallenged.

Fascinating that the judges who rejected Letby's request for leave to appeal took the trouble of insinuating Dr Ravi Jayaram is a liar in today's decision.

@maxangel_gr @LucyLetbyTrials Every part of her demeanour is proof of guilt for these twisters. Not sad enough? Guilty! Too sad? Guilty Angry? Guilty! Not angry? Well that proves she’s guilty The biggest joke was the “we failed her cos she was cold and emotionless” tagged alongside her manipulating….

I’d * love* to see these geniuses, after months alone and perhaps worse in prison on antidepressants, undergo severe and hostile questioning on their lives and work, for days on end. See how guilty they’d look.