jeff hancock
@jeffhancock
Followers
2K
Following
662
Media
7
Statuses
287
RT @EricNeumannPsy: šØ NEW PRE-PRINT šØ. Our participants think >40% (!) of online users act toxic on Reddit and share fake news on FB. (š
)ā¦.
0
29
0
RT @msbernst: Work with faculty including @AngeleChristin (Communication), Jeanne Tsai (Psych), @jeffhancock (Communication), @jugander (MSā¦.
0
3
0
RT @JiaChenyan: Can we design AI systems to consider democratic values as their objective functions? Our new #CSCW24 paper w/ @michelle123lā¦.
0
24
0
RT @Ross_Dahlke: šØNew from me @_kumarde Durumeric @jeffhancock. We use web-browsing data (N = 21M) to quantify the (in)accessibility of misā¦.
0
18
0
RT @StanfordCyber: Tomorrow at noon Pacific, join @jeffhancock in conversation with @persily, for a discussion on the implications of AI adā¦.
cyber.fsi.stanford.edu
0
7
0
RT @StanfordCyber: Tuesday, April 25, @jeffhancock talks with @michalkosinski about research suggesting that ToM-like ability (thus far conā¦.
0
9
0
RT @Ross_Dahlke: My first ever publication is finally out! This project with @RyanMooreComm and @jeffhancock began before I even started grā¦.
nature.com
Nature Human Behaviour - Moore et al. find that fewer Americans visited misinformation websites during the 2020 election compared with the 2016 election. However, demographic groups more likely to...
0
13
0
RT @RyanMooreComm: Thrilled this paper is out! I hope it contributes to the misinformation conversation by (1) focusing us on those most liā¦.
0
3
0
Access the full paper here: DM for an ungated copy.
nature.com
Nature Human Behaviour - Moore et al. find that fewer Americans visited misinformation websites during the 2020 election compared with the 2016 election. However, demographic groups more likely to...
6
1
11
We also found that people were less likely to arrive at misinformation websites via Facebook and webmail.
6
1
11
Despite an overall reduction in exposure and engagement from 2016 to 2020, older adults and those with conservative media diets remained the most likely to be exposed to misinformation.
1
0
10
Building on work from @andyguess @BrendanNyhan @JasonReifler on the 2016 election, we collected mobile and desktop web browsing data and combined it with a list of misinformation websites from the 2016 paper and @NewsGuardRating to identify misinformation exposures.
1
0
7
šØš¬ New paper out in @NatureHumBehav w/ @RyanMooreComm and @Ross_Dahlke. How many Americans were exposed to misinformation during the 2020 election? . We find that 26.2% of Americans were exposed in 2020 compared to 44.3% during the 2016 election. š§µš.
nytimes.com
Nearly 68 million Americans still visited untrustworthy websites 1.5 billion times in a month, according to Stanford researchers, causing concerns for 2024.
18
41
98
RT @Stanford: As the use of AI-generated text increases, Prof. @jeffhancock and @StanfordHAI scholars propose solutionsāwatermarks, accentsā¦.
hai.stanford.edu
New research shows we can only accurately identify AI writers about 50% of the time. Scholars explain why (and suggest solutions).
0
18
0
RT @CornellNews: AI or human? Assumptions regarding language usage can lead to flawed judgments of whether language was AI- or human-generaā¦.
news.cornell.edu
Human assumptions regarding language usage can lead to flawed judgments of whether language was AI- or human-generated, Cornell Tech and Stanford researchers found in a series of experiments.
0
3
0
RT @journalsafetech: šļø We're excited to announce dates for the 2nd annual Trust & Safety Research Conference: September 28-29, 2023, at Stā¦.
0
20
0
RT @mattyglesias: There are > 100,000 schools in America and unless itās your kidās school, on any given day youāre most likely to hear aboā¦.
0
53
0
RT @journalsafetech: š Big news: The fall issue of the Journal of Online Trust & Safety will be the Conference Proceedings for the 2nd Annuā¦.
0
4
0
RT @lauriesantos: Big announcementā @Yale's FREE new happiness course for teenagers is finally here! The Science of Well-being for Teens isā¦.
0
1K
0