Mayank Yadav
@imayankyadav
Followers
3K
Following
45
Media
10
Statuses
89
Engineer | Lawyer | LLM from TISS, Mumbai Practicing Advocate at the Supreme Court| Teaches Tax Law@Delhi University| Bylines: @The_Hindu @DeccanHerald
Joined December 2021
The way @ECISVEEP is responding is preposterous. RG isn’t some random lad, he’s the LoP in the Lok Sabha. What if he tables this in the House? Instead of addressing the grave charges, they demand affidavits. Either Point out the falsehood or we must conclude ECI is exposed.
1
7
24
Need For A Refugee Law And Sensitisation Of Higher Judiciary -Adv. Mayank Yadav writes #RefugeeLaw #SupremeCourtofIndia #UNHCR Need For A Refugee Law And Sensitisation Of Higher Judiciary
livelaw.in
Recently, while dealing with a matter pertaining to the asylum of a refugee from Sri Lanka, the Supreme Court Justice Dipankar Dutta has made a remark that “Is India a Dharamshala to host refugees...
0
6
10
All credit to @Shreyyadav20 , Pradumn and our interns.
सद्गुरु वीडियो मामले में जयपुर में मुझे परेशान करने के लिए एक बेसलेस FIR की गई थी। मैं जाँच में सहयोग के लिए दिल्ली से जयपुर गया। इस मामले में कोर्ट ने मुझे एंटीसिपेटरी बेल ग्रांट कर दी है। सद्गुरु वीडियो मामले में ही दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट में भी मेरे ऊपर 3 करोड़ की मानहानि का केस चल
5
15
145
Places of worship is a Central Act in force,still judicial officers in UP allow surveys at religious places.Ex CJ Chandrachud did nothing when Gyanvapi case was placed before him. Now it's repeated in Sambhal.Hope the SC now takes cognizance & sends such officers back to training
1
8
53
This is unfortunate. What’s happening is a violation of constitutional values.
New modus operandi in UP is that the district court judges give permission to conduct surveys at religious places,despite the Places of Worship Act.Instead of discouraging the violation of a Central Act,the former CJ Chandrachud did nothing while Gyanvapi case was before him.
0
2
14
New modus operandi in UP is that the district court judges give permission to conduct surveys at religious places,despite the Places of Worship Act.Instead of discouraging the violation of a Central Act,the former CJ Chandrachud did nothing while Gyanvapi case was before him.
3
7
29
People like @ReheSamay who used their influence to instigate people to commit contempt of Court, must be brought to justice. @DelhiPolice
No implementation of ban on firecrackers in Delhi during Diwali 2024: #SupremeCourt directs Delhi government and Delhi Police Commissioner to file affidavits stating steps taken to implement the ban as well as proposed steps to ensure compliance with ban next year.
1
2
14
Supreme Court has banned burning of polluting fire crackers.Delhi High Court banned even the selling of crackers till Jan 1st. Provoking people to do so amounts to contempt of court. @ReheSamay can't take a plea that he was unaware of this as ignorance of law is no excuse.
संघियों ने ऐसा माहौल बनाया है कि कोई सभ्य आदमी आज ये बोल नहीं सकता कि दीवाली पर सावधानी बरतना। ऊपर से @ReheSamay जैसे अवसरवादी भक्तों का सपोर्ट लेने के लिए बोलते हैं- ‘जो करना है करो’. समाज की नति तब नहीं होती जब बुरे लोग बढ़ जाएँ, बल्कि तब होती है जब अच्छे लोग बोलना बंद कर दें।
1
8
36
Erroneous judgment without envisaging its impact.Allocation of work on the basis of caste is wrong,must stop; however maintaining caste based data helps understanding the social realities of d prison system.Well written by @shrutikapandeyy & @SIDDHARTH_474
https://t.co/eMtpjhPgkR
scroll.in
The landmark ruling strikes the right note but echoes the political rhetoric of privileged castes that erasing records equals erasing casteism.
0
1
9
I believe @DelhiPolice isn't suffering from Alzheimer.Don't forget how 6 yrs ago 6 police personnel including SHO Adarsh N.were booked under SC/ST Act on assaulting a law student &apart from criminal case how much compensation they had 2 give after NHRC & High court intervention
0
3
13
One group of the students (including the original complainant against the DCP) is being detained at Najafgarh, and others at Narela and Bawana.
0
5
18
As a teacher of them, I myself had gone there at the Police Station and had a heated conversation with the Addl. DCP for getting an FIR registered. However, the police rather chose to detain the people.
1
3
18
A couple of days ago,students of Law Faculty,DU got allegedly assaulted & illegally detained by @DelhiPolice. Against that law students were protesting for past two days, today the protesting students have been detained again for protesting against the illegal detention itself.
4
10
64
Whenever the regime changes, a commission should be set up to inquire about the demolitions that took place in UP and the role of the CM who considers himself above law.
While hearing a batch of pleas against "bulldozer actions", the Supreme Court passed an interim order that no demolition should take place in the country without its permission. Read more: https://t.co/R09IIdG89T
#SupremeCourt #bulldozer
4
4
48
अपने मकानों पर बुलडोजर चलवाकर, हर तरह के सामाजिक राजनैतिक हमले सहकर भी जिन समुदायों ने समाजवादी पार्टी को जिंदा बचाए रखा,उसे हर तरह से मजबूत किया.उसका नेतृत्व उन समुदायों की हक हुकूकों की रक्षा तो छोड़ दीजिए,उनकी पहचान आधारित हत्याओं पर एक ठीक मजबूत आवाज भी नहीं उठा पाया.
6
18
83
Precisely !
@imayankyadav In a democracy, accountability is key, especially when it comes to the use of force by the state. The demand for the suspension of the officer involved in the encounter and the filing of an FIR within three days is not just a question of justice, but of the integrity of our
0
0
18
LoP, UP Assembly must resign if he can't get FIR registered & get the police officials suspended who wr involved in the encounter. Encounter Killings is a political tool hence political resistance is a must. Appears as if a syndicate of criminals ¬ police is running the state
4
41
137
तीन दिन के अंदर एसटीएफ के उस पुलिसिये को सस्पेंड कराकर FIR न दर्ज़ करा पाएं तो नेता विरोधी दल,यूपी विधानसभा को इस्तीफा दे देना चाहिए. एनकाउंटर किलिंग राजनैतिक टूल है, विरोध भी राजनैतिक होना चाहिये.जिन समुदायों का वोट लेकर नेता बने हैं, उनके लिए कभी सड़क का रास्ता भी अपनाइए.
34
188
743