drewwww Profile Banner
Drew Harry Profile
Drew Harry

@drewwww

Followers
2K
Following
35K
Media
247
Statuses
9K

moving to: https://t.co/Szib6PcbhQ (mastadon) ex. research & data @twitch. phd @medialab. engineer @olincollege. he/him.

The City & The City, CA
Joined June 2008
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
runner is a non-combat, movement-oriented roguelike. You can't fight any of your enemies, but you can avoid them with skillful use of your movement. You'll win if you can manage to stay ahead of the pursuing HUNTER bot. My #7DRL 2024 entry! Links in reply.
5
1
14
@sftransitact
Yes on L: Fund the Bus!
1 year
Right now, San Francisco’s ride-hail taxes are the lowest of any major U.S. city that taxes these companies. Our endorsers across SF's political spectrum, labor, climate, and business groups all agree: Prop L is a common-sense solution to keep vital Muni service running!
11
32
95
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
But this is not anything new. This is verbatim Amazon's "Dive Deep" value: "Leaders operate at all levels, stay connected to the details, audit frequently, and are skeptical when metrics and anecdote differ. No task is beneath them."
0
0
1
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
And so in a sense, I agree with the core argument of the essay. In a high context organization, you need to pull important decisions UP to the right context level to make them. Not try to push context DOWN. To make those decisions well, pull info from people N levels below.
1
0
0
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
Perhaps the thing founder-mode argues against is the practice of pushing decisions "down" in an organization. I've seen leaders pride themselves on NOT making decisions, simply coaching team members and letting some future accountability moment server as feedback.
1
0
0
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
A common antecedent is the belief that if you install the right incentive structures and feedback loops, detailed operational oversight is not necessary because the system will work itself out. I strongly disagree with this model of org-building, but it is certainly popular.
1
0
1
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
Alternate explanations for the (very low-n) phenomenon this essay is ostensibly capturing: (1) founders are bad at hiring execs (2) founders are not doing the job of concrete day-to-day leadership very well
1
0
0
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
When you refuse to build targeting tools for your push marketing team.
0
0
1
@sftransitact
Yes on L: Fund the Bus!
2 years
Join us in voting YES on Prop L! Prop L is a broadly supported, common-sense solution to reduce Muni service cuts, keep downtown recovering, and provide the reliable transit needed by San Francisco's seniors, families, and workers. Find out more at https://t.co/VKsNoOAExy.
10
39
97
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
Alternatively, don’t state policy preferences. Or don’t donate. But if you do both, it’s influence.
0
0
1
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
A coherent position is to donate for your policy goals and simultaneously fight to have that option taken away from you. But as long as this scale of influence is legal, don’t pretend a politician will ignore the publicly stated policy preferences of mega donors.
1
0
0
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
A lot of words for a very smart person to perform not understanding how influence works. One can have a principled objection to Khan but this is unseemly. Embrace the position — you want Khan gone and money will flow to the politician that does it.
@reidhoffman
Reid Hoffman
2 years
For the last three presidential elections, I've been making the case that Donald Trump threatens the rule of law, creates constant chaos, and always puts his own interests above America's. All of these things make it harder for American businesses to operate efficiently and plan
2
0
3
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
Spotify can barely make margin on licensed content, and so it desperately needs to develop listeners who spend time on cheaper content if they want to make any serious money.
@chaykak
Kyle Chayka
2 years
my @NewYorker column this week is on how Spotify got too enshittified to use for listening to music, and the cognitive dissonance of trying to do something with an app that its designers don't want you to do anymore
0
0
2
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
Let us embark on the Golden Path together!
0
0
3
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
Purge the wordcels
0
0
0
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
It doesn't help that the unit names are a weird mix of evocative/funny (Katbus, King Crab, Valkyrie) and extremely utilitarian (Sniper, Blink, Raider, Turret, Mortar). For units without more fiction-forward names, it's impossible to know what they do intuitively.
0
0
0
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
But watch how it looks in game here: https://t.co/q8Y0ltgajJ It fires very quickly, at medium range. It's like an automatic shotgun, almost (with no reload). That just doesn't "read" correctly to me. Lots of units have problems of this type, where their shape/name doesn't track.
1
0
0
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
The unit designs are of variable quality, IMO. The animations and movement styles don't necessarily track with their behavior in the game. Consider this guy, the Ballista. IMO, something called Ballista should fire slowly and do high damage on hit. Maybe has splash.
1
0
0
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
I think it's got the juice??? It's simple, but it's got the RTS vibes. There's plenty of opportunity for getting tactical micro advantage. There's just enough macro to be compelling -- when do you expand, when do you tech, and so on.
1
0
0
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
I'm fascinated by the post-Starcraft RTS design space. There's a flurry of games trying to pick up the mantle of "next gen" RTS. Today I'm going to try Battle Aces, one that seems the most promising to me: https://t.co/qveyI8O0td
1
1
3
@drewwww
Drew Harry
2 years
Google is the odd one out though, because they are actively cannibalizing their core search business. So their downside is much greater than MSFT or AAPL. Everyone else is making a “value add” play. Or selling tools.
0
0
0