Vicki Allen Crabb
@crabb_vicki
Followers
6,028
Following
3,430
Media
1,971
Statuses
62,373
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
어린이날
• 474258 Tweets
こどもの日
• 440997 Tweets
子供の日
• 122339 Tweets
鯉のぼり
• 85785 Tweets
#光る君へ
• 80124 Tweets
#鬼滅の刃
• 76801 Tweets
GW最終日
• 59845 Tweets
予選突破
• 41412 Tweets
Dhoni
• 40577 Tweets
#PBKSvCSK
• 30305 Tweets
Happy Easter
• 25672 Tweets
Thala
• 22774 Tweets
KRIST SINGTO GOLDENSONG
• 22248 Tweets
アフター
• 21668 Tweets
Al Jazeera
• 17873 Tweets
予選通過
• 17444 Tweets
Ginting
• 16789 Tweets
#羽生結弦RE_PRAY舞台裏SP
• 15294 Tweets
えーりん
• 13846 Tweets
BUILD INFINITY 1 MILLION
• 12761 Tweets
四塩化一黄酸
• 12091 Tweets
Pinned Tweet
@leaderslead1968
@Rick_Pescatore
Risk of encephalitis:
From measles 1/1000 cases
From mumps 1/300-6000 cases
From rubella 1/6000 cases
From any of above diseases 4K-13.5K per 3,000,000 cases
From vaccination 1/3,000,000 vaccinations.
Which is the larger risk?
213
128
429
This is long overdue. So long Mary! You earned it. KYAG.
68
48
1K
If you think applying a mask to a toddler is tough, you don’t want to hear about how hard it is to care for a critically ill child. Endotracheal tubes are much worse than masks.
114
134
898
Uh, Steve?
You just owned yourself, again.
Antibiotics don't treat or prevent viral infections.
They treat bacterial infections.
You're an idiot.
215
58
761
Uh, Steve?
I had consented to a debate with you almost one year ago. You bailed. You cancelled. You lost.
58
62
659
Wait, Anastasia? Are you saying that “turbo-cancer” is any cancer that’s diagnosed after vaccination?
Um, the CDC didn’t confirm the presence of “turbo-cancers” nor did the agency confirm the incidence of cancer after vaccination.
THERE’S NO CONTROL GROUP!
141
53
583
Steve Kirsch claims the Amish don’t experience autism because they don’t vaccinate. Amish children do experience autism. Their school systems are not trained to detect cases & hesitancy to seek routine healthcare affects case-finding.
50
68
559
Deleting your tweet doesn’t mean you didn’t say it. Again, how does hyper-oxygenating ORs (which they don’t do for safety reasons-risk of fire) or logistic reasons (you know-doors?) impact pCO2?
42
43
549
Dr Thorp appears challenged by math.
He claims that 714 million people have died as a result of the vaccine, but he doesn’t realize the estimated total US population is 332 million
In the 3 years since the vaccine rollout, we’ve lost almost the entire US population, twice?
106
71
474
How many people who have proven your claims wrong have you actually paid?
You’re all foam and no beer.
You couldn’t afford me. My soul is not for sale.
137
21
453
Uh, Naomi? You appear to have a serious lack of understanding of the Nuremberg Code. It doesn’t apply to physician practice, it applies to experiments involving human subjects.
Oh, and don’t cite porn stars.
58
36
432
@TheFyfie
@Takethatdoctors
There are people making multiple guesses and ruining the surprise for others. When will you post the answer?
5
4
420
Um, Naomi? The Nuremberg Code didn’t change or weaken.
It’s a standing document outlining basic principles of ethical experiments involving humans.
It would be great if poetry majors actually studied the topic, before making inaccurate statements.
58
49
413
Hey Steve?
Why can’t I find anyone to chat with you?
I’m not your nursemaid. Be a good boy and go eat crayons with the rest of the toddlers.
You’re doing an analysis in a spread sheet? Lord, help me.
129
27
399
Hello Vance?
Over 81% of the US is vaccinated. Most of the deaths from sudden cardiac arrests will occur in the vaccinated.
Please learn base-rate fallacy.
@DrCanuckMD
Find me one anti vaxxer under 40, that has suffered sudden cardiac arrest in the last 4 months.
Meanwhile I can give you hundreds from vaccinated individuals
63
23
225
76
30
367
Steve doesn’t understand epidemiology or biostatistics.
It appears he struggles with reading comprehension. His cited source does not say NZ officials were trying to “stop the truth”. They’re trying to prevent the release of private health information.
325
47
355
Hey Steve?
Too late-that ship sailed back in April and May.
I was part of the debate team Karan organized-you know, the one you challenged him to put together and debate “your team”?
You dispersed faster than a fart in a fan company.
It’s results, not execution.
76
35
354
Imagine being this ignorant as to believe rapidly rising case numbers don’t impact our healthcare system.
Everyone deserves treatment.
Being vaccinated reduces the likelihood of hospitalization and reduces healthcare strain.
505
37
323
Another study showed the rise in myocarditis PRIOR to the rollout of vaccines.
COVID-related myocarditis decreased after the introduction of the vaccines.
@crabb_vicki
And yet every single published data source reporting on myocarditis incidence shows a rise with vaccination and not before.
43
52
266
32
61
312
Hello Steve?
I cited 2 meta analyses showing the reduction of mortality risks by vaccinating against COVID.
Instead of refuting the evidence, you call me uninformed, challenging me to a “chat”.
Are you unable to address the evidence cited based on data and “execution”?
120
25
305
Oh Steve, you colonic calliope!
You’ve cried wolf too many times.
Debate your echo chamber. The grownups have work to do.
74
16
293
Steve “not a scientist” Kirsch, lectures scientist on science. Gorski has 53 publications. Kirsch has zero.
@gorskon
It wasn't a stunt wager and I'm not a crank. You are not a scientist. Scientists are not afraid of being challenged on their studies, scientists seek data transparency, scientists call for retraction of papers based on flawed data, scientists will provide their data upon request,…
72
30
390
99
20
278
Hello Simon? You can’t claim measles cases were reduced prior to the introduction of vaccines and then cite mortality rates.
Stick to plants.
32
24
266
Says the guy who continues to lie in the presence of evidence contrary to his claims.
Says the guy who doesn’t know how you would measure “turbo cancer” to determine its presence or its association with vaccination.
159
17
267
Steve admits to doing a “simple” analysis.
May we assume Steve didn’t bother to even adjust for age in your “simple” analysis? Comorbidities?
What’s the point of having patient-level data if you don’t adjust for confounders?
DA.
117
19
263
Uh, William? Are you one of those healthcare providers who are over-prescribing antimicrobials for conditions where the patient isn’t likely to benefit from the medication?
Oh wait, as a nuclear medicine physician, do you manage patients? No.
57
12
266
You’re incorrect. Since the start of the pandemic, an estimated 1700 children have died and 185,000 children have required hospitalization. COVID POSES RISKS TO CHILDREN. .
@CDCgov
Completely wrong. There is zero benefit (since the kids aren’t at risk from covid to start with) and the risk of adverse reaction is positive (small, but more than zero)
78
1
10
28
54
252
What’s worse than man-splaining? Privileged white guys comparing public health measures to the Holocaust while targeting Jewish individuals with veiled threats. You weren’t forced. You weren’t experimented on. Get over yourself.
64
44
245
I'm curious why you have an MD in your bio? Has anyone mistaken you for a doctor?
@Doctor_Eric_B
And I’m curious why you have pronouns in your bio. Seriously. Have you been mistaken for a woman and feel the need to clarify?
1K
26
386
17
10
227
Mary? The point is not about “pink eye”.
It’s about zoonotic transmission of a highly pathogenic virus to a new species (cattle) with onward transmission to a human.
The risk to humans is still low, but wouldn’t you want to know if that changes?
Prevention is important.
56
27
234
@RameseSanders
Neither study cited supports your claim.
Both studies (a meta & a RCT) examined the association of early administration of antibiotics and mortality from sepsis, not whether sepsis is caused by "bacteria".
Sepsis is caused by bacteria, viruses, & fungi.
7
3
229
Breaking news in the world of epidemiology. We no longer have to obtain and analyze mortality data. We don’t have to worry about confounders, measurement error, and selection bias. According to used clothes salesman, we can just count “obits”!!
37
24
219
Uh, William?
Your screenshots do not support your claims.
Um, William?
Do you understand how to interpret epidemiological data? You have some confounders in there.
All-cause hospitalizations will be higher in the most vaccinated. They’re older and have more comorbidities.
35
16
219
Now you have “medicare” data, do ya? “Record-level”?
It’s Medicare, not “medicare”.
What’s next? Pie charts?
95
9
215
Steve repeatedly flunks survey design.
100% of flat-earthers believe the earth is flat.
67
22
214
It also appears Dr Huang has been disciplined for repeated acts of negligence, failure to maintain adequate medical records, and unprofessional conduct.
14
19
209
Aren’t you the one who confused antifreeze with PEG?
@crabb_vicki
Which is why I will never promote injecting a child or adult with a dangerous and deadly vaccine - NO MASKS NO VAX- stop the fear-mongering!
30
5
44
20
8
204
Steve appears unable to search PubMed.
Case reports and case series of pediatric patients with COVID-19-related myocarditis in 2020.
30
30
204
Someone needs to tell Mark that antibiotics do not work for viral illnesses.
It’s not a “dangerous trend”. It’s called antibiotic stewardship. These programs started in the 1990s to reduce inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics-a factor leading to antimicrobial resistance.
60
26
203
Uh Steve? What are “public health records”?
Let’s get one thing straight. Anyone can call themselves a “data analyst”. It doesn’t confer any expertise in design and analysis of epidemiological data.
IT workers don’t study epidemiology.
33
15
203
Uh, Steve?
I cited my claims, you silly Braunschweiger. You snipped it from the screenshot.
Here's another concept you don't grasp, efficacy versus effectiveness.
30
22
203
Er Steve?
Remember, we’ve been through this before. You know, the debate team you organized with Karan in May but then backed out of?
You dispersed faster than a trouser cough in a headwind.
42
17
198
Mary, are you saying not matching for a residency is worse than ethical violations? ~5% of medical students don’t match. Being fired by your employer because you refuse to treat vaccinated individuals speaks to your ethics.
12
13
198
Antivaxxer lectures former antivaxxer on the antivaccination movement. Give it up, William. Lydia takes no prisoners.
36
16
191
We tussled.
28
3
187
Steve thinks his tantrums should be attended to before the needs of those who are critically ill.
20
10
191
Citation needed.
1135% increase risk for autism for one shot. Hep B
CDC was aware of it and they buried the information. How many thousands of lives have been devastated? Time to hold these people accountable.!
79
873
2K
48
5
187
Indisputable evidence that Steve doesn’t understand causality.
By Steve’s logic, smoking doesn’t cause lung cancer.
Not everyone who smokes gets lung cancer.
Not everyone who gets lung cancer is a smoker.
Temporality is NECESSARY, but not sufficient, to infer causality.
97
20
184
I’m not sure why you believe treatment of disease is preferable to prevention of disease.
In contrast to HPV, where if a person is screened regularly and is treated for abnormal lesions, the prognosis is exceptionally good. In other words, you have time to act. I worried with meningitis I might not have time to act to help my son.
57
1
29
27
18
181
Steve? Another claim you can’t substantiate.
The 2019 study by Hviid et al did not find evidence of clustering of autism diagnoses after vaccination, necessary data to support your claim.
Do you need help interpreting a KM cumulative incidence curve?
43
18
183
I’m smarter than you are. I am more ethical.
@crabb_vicki
You can show us how smart you are. Or maybe it won’t work out so well for you.
15
9
115
213
9
181
Another study that refutes your claim.
"the occurrence of myocarditis inpatient encounters was 42% higher in 2020 than in 2019...16 times as high as the risk among patients without COVID-19. This risk was especially elevated in older adults & children.
@crabb_vicki
And yet every single published data source reporting on myocarditis incidence shows a rise with vaccination and not before.
43
52
266
25
27
179
Did you really just cite a hypothesis paper?
There's no data.
There's no study population.
There's no control group.
There are no methods.
There are no analyses of data.
No, this is NOT epidemiological data.
RED FLAG over mRNA vaccines & CDC recommendation to boost every 4-6 mo!
Boosters cause switch to IgG4 antibodies & tolerance to SAR-COV-2 & higher risk of severe illness! Associated with higher risk of cancer & autoimmune diseases!
This is supported by epidemiological data!…
75
587
1K
20
19
175
I’m positive Makis wouldn’t be able to explain what a “turbo” cancer is and how you would detect it epidemiologically.
UK - Professional yachtsman Mel Coleman, age 60, died suddenly just weeks after cancer diagnosis
He had been in perfect health
"Short battle with cancer"
with COVID-19 mRNA vaccine induced turbo cancer, these battles are sometimes extremely short
#DiedSuddenly
#cdnpoli
#ableg
162
527
1K
54
32
173
Uh, Pete?
There's no unvaccinated control group, so you don't know if there's an elevated risk of SCD in this population or not.
All of the individuals had risk factors for SCD. (Table 1)
Does dilated cardiomyopathy occur overnight?
58
31
174
It appears we have an account threatening Dr Copeland.
Rub an antivaxxer, get a racist.
55
18
172
Uh, John?
Eden died of an intracranial hemorrhage from an undiagnosed arteriovenous malformation.
You don't know the cause of death of the others nor do you know their vaccination status.
You don't "deal in facts". You make up your own "facts".
@sjs856
This is a good thread by you because it completely discredits you in the eyes of the Twitter world.
Diane 62yo
Brianna 30yo
Eden 17yo
Amaya 12yo
Just one state. Proven beyond reasonable doubt that jabs caused strokes.
Plenty more to come.
I deal in facts, not junk papers
30
15
135
9
12
172
This is NOT a new concept. In 1996, the American Heart Association issued recommendations for routine screening of athletes for risk of SCA. Are you intentionally being misleading?
🚨HUNDREDS OF PHILADELPHIA STUDENT-ATHLETES GET HEART HEALTH SCREENINGS
22
146
256
28
40
170
“Crunching numbers” is not a valid approach to analyzing epidemiological data.
You won’t hear the term used in any stats or epi course, either.
137
12
167
Mary just couldn’t help herself. Second account lost to harassment and abuse of others. Bye MTB. Don’t let the door hit you ….
13
5
157
Steve, you didn't cite "statistics" from "any geriatric practice". The article you cited stated the opposite of your claims.
A meta-analysis demonstrated an almost 85% reduction in COVID-19 mortality in older adults.
13
19
163
Imagine being completely unaware of the field of pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance and those studies are only performed by Bob from the internet.
Hello Ben?
PubMed is full of these studies done by professionals who know the methods.
52
10
162
The actual study you’re referring to concludes, “These findings do not provide substantial support for a causal association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and healthcare contacts related to menstrual or bleeding disorders.”
“One or more doses of the messenger RNA shots increased the risk of the bleeding in women aged 12 to 74, Swedish researchers reported in the study, published on May 3 by the British Medical Journal.
The younger women were also at a heightened risk of menstrual disturbance,…
60
332
703
29
29
159
Why’d ya bail when you had the chance, Steve?
You dispersed faster than you could “shoot a bunny” (as the New Zealanders like to call it) in a gale.
Are you going to massage this data too?
164
13
154
Another ‘less than brilliant’ inference by Wrong-way William.
Major Kettler took his own life.
46
23
157
You’ve cited a blog as evidence?
Please cite the science literature.
A large cohort study (> 650k) from Denmark did not find an elevated risk of autism after vaccination.
Before COVID, I didn't believe vaccines caused autism or that everyone would cover it up. Now I get that they do and my question's become how?
This brilliant article explains how they cause autism and that those same mechanisms underly COVID vax injuries.
537
7K
14K
65
21
158
The risk of myocarditis after vaccination is much lower (and surveillance bias cannot be ruled out) than the risk of myocarditis after COVID. The risks posed by COVID are significantly higher than the risks posed by vaccination. Mortality.
Oh yes you are right they didn’t “coin it” but they do dust it off every time there is a new product to push. Benefits outweigh the risks? For all people or different age groups? They us it as a blanket term, they sure took awhile to rescind it to young males.
#AKAmyocarditis
1
1
0
81
26
151
In a meta-analysis of adverse events reported in nocebo trials (they were given a placebo, but think they were getting treated), 50% reported an adverse event, of these, 5% withdrew from the trial.
This highlights the importance of a CONTROL group.
Worth pointing out👇
Of the 50 study participants that got the Moderna monovalent vax
@CDCgov
universally recommended today, 1/50 (2%) had a medically-attended adverse event related to the vax
W/unknown clinical benefits how can CDC say w certainty benefits outweigh risks 4 all?
75
521
1K
13
40
157
Wow! Who would have predicted this turn of events?
Get help Andrew.
33
4
154
The truth?
You've cited death rates, not incidence rates. Improved sanitation, healthcare, and antibiotics reduced mortality, but didn't reduce the cases.
Note the number of cases after the introduction of vaccines.
I have no interest in debating the vaccine myth with anybody.
I am only interested in truth:
71
236
630
21
24
153
Poor Erin has had another account suspended. Don’t let the door hit you on your way out, Erin.
24
10
150
Uh Steve, surveys for studies are NOT exempt from IRB approval. Studies using survey methods require interaction with individuals and are therefore subject to IRB approval. .
@tenebra99
@MsAmitripped
@AlBowers1
Ethics board? It's a survey. It's exempt from IRB approval.
Perhaps we can spend a few months and I'll educate you about these things work?
28
1
0
13
11
150
A prime example of why you should pay attention in high school.
No Karen, there were 22 RCTs with over 3 MILLION participants, 65 years and older, alone.
No Karen, they weren’t mice.
)%20in
These so called "PhD and MD's" will try to blast VAERS for many reasons such as "no control group." Wait till you read up on the
#COVIDvaccine
and realize there was no control group either during clinical trials and it was approved after being tested on 8 mice. Yes 8 mice.
18
0
4
76
31
152
You're making incorrect and unsubstantiated claims, again.
The mortality rates are significantly lower in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.
26
12
153
Oh, William, ya silly little beaver.
“Fake websites” is the excuse you’re going with?
Are you related to Fred Phelps?
27
18
152
It’s not an attack, ya silly goober.
Dr Han has made his case in his article. You may address his points with a reasoned response.
I know that’s a lot to ask.
Welcome to science.
Data and methods count.
29
17
153
So no, you have zero idea how a "turbo" cancer would be identified?
What variables would you examine?
@crabb_vicki
You should try a little humility, Vicki.
Your arrogance isn't going to get you very far in life.
You're 3 years behind most people, and it seems your PhD has been a complete waste of time.
69
53
623
38
8
150
Uh Naomi?
The total fertility rate is unchanged.
Mr Berenson got something right. You were not as lucky.
18
20
152
Hello Steve?
You might want to brush up on what an epidemiologist is. We don’t wear scrubs or stethoscopes.
14
7
149
It appears you need a Ph.D. to make a coherent claim.
The pooled IFR was 1%.
Neither IVM nor HCQ has demonstrated efficacy in the prevention or treatment of COVID.
Vaccinations reduce the risk of infection, the likelihood of transmission, and the risk of severe outcomes.
Imagine being gullible with a PhD unable to distinguish a pandemic that never was when 99.997% survived from it, then believing you need a "vaccine" after Ivermetin and HCQ were off-labeled to introduce the vax
Children can figure it out by now
24
7
58
162
13
150
Tell us you don't understand epidemiology without telling us you don't understand epidemiology.
A time-series analysis summary? Do you mean a longitudinal study?
What's underlying data?
Just show me *ONE* PROSPECTIVE STUDY comparing autism rates in vaxxed vs. fully vaxxed, not a meta-analysis. I want to see the cohort time-series analysis summary of the two groups. 3,000 vaxxed vs. unvaxxed followed from birth to at least 6 years old. Compare autism rates in the…
59
52
491
19
7
144
You’re incorrect. Do you know where mortality data comes from? Local and state public health departments. Safety data is obtained from vaccination time. We don’t determine if an antibiotic is effective two hours after we administer it. Onset of action.
Mortality rates have been rigged, by not counting people as vaccinated until 14 days after the second jab. So many jabbed people have died & been labeled as unvaxed. It is fraud.
15
0
2
22
9
141
Dr. Lee’s expounding on his favorite topic-himself.
62
3
139
First, you need to take a biostats course. Your inference on this figure is incorrect. You’re looking for divergence of the confidence intervals, not where the “rate leaves the 95% interval”.
You don’t appear to understand confounding, either.
@crabb_vicki
Let’s start by showing real world efficacy against illness, hospitalization and deaths. All causes, not manipulated PCR numbers.
14
0
23
58
8
138
Dr. Ian Mackay (
@MackayIM
) gives a great explanation about PCR testing for all the internet "expert" virologists.
10
67
139
I drew my conclusion!
So we had a growth of 2.8 million people with disabilities. The first red line is roughly when covid began and the second red line is around the time the jabs were released. Draw your own conclusions. This is unparalleled at any time in history to have such a precipitous rise in…
132
936
2K
36
6
138
Another “less than accurate” claim. It’s almost like it’s intentional?
Dr Shirey passed from injuries sustained in a a fall, not from a vaccine.
69
14
133
VAERS cannot generate an appropriate control group. And no, other vaccines are not an adequate control group to estimate risk. Since VAERS is self-reported, it includes multiple reports, often without information.
You need a control group to estimate risk.
/4
76
8
135
I guess your employer got wind of you harassing and doxxing Ms Lang? Or was it your undeclared COI on your publication on the benefits of calcium supplements (the ones you peddle?).
8
6
134
Once again, Luther can’t be bothered to provide evidence.
Vaccines reduce your risk of infection, severe disease, death, and the likelihood of transmitting COVID-19 to others, if infected.
.
195
14
132
This guy thinks it’s okay to threaten women on social media.
57
10
131
Dr. Byron Whyte's (
@UrbaneDoc4kids
) account has been suspended. He has faced attacks from antivaxxers and racists for years.
ENOUGH.
#BringBackDrWhyte
9
61
126
Vance is completely unaware of the epidemiology of sudden cardiac arrest.
A study of high school and college athletes from 2014 through 2018 documented 331 CONFIRMED cases of SCA in athletes.
Hello Vance? They weren't vaccinated.
Background rates matter
@DrCanuckMD
Find me one anti vaxxer under 40, that has suffered sudden cardiac arrest in the last 4 months.
Meanwhile I can give you hundreds from vaccinated individuals
63
23
225
25
10
130
Uh, Steve, you can't estimate risk without a control group. I'm not sure why this is such a hard concept.
A meta-analysis of 9 case-control studies concluded that vaccinations reduced the odds of SIDS by 50%.
And for those who claim VAERS is unreliable, here's proof you are wrong. And if you can't figure out why this is proof you are wrong, you are unqualified to be making any statements about VAERS whatsoever. Parroting the gaslighting wording on the VAERS site won't save you. This…
32
61
245
24
14
122