
Brian L. Frye
@brianlfrye
Followers
17K
Following
141K
Media
7K
Statuses
100K
Dogecoin Professor of Law & Grifting @ukcollegeoflaw, securities artist &c. @SECgov describes scholarship as "fanciful." @IpseDixitPod georgecparker.eth
Algiers Point, LA
Joined October 2011
I would much rather have all these books (& more) available in a free, word-searchable format. But copyright says no.
0
0
1
I'd buy that for a dollar.
I'm sorry to say it but we need to bring back adbusters. we need to bring back an anti-consumerist, anti-corporate, anti-advertising counterculture. we need to bring back the sentiment that cashing in is selling out, and selling out is shameful. shit is completely out of control
2
1
1
surround yourself with people who see & appreciate you for the absolute nerd you truly are 🥰 🦀
3
1
23
A few weeks ago, Mark Lemley & Lisa Ouellette posted an essay titled “Plagiarism, Copyright, AI,” arguing that plagiarism norms should require the attribution of all expressions & ideas in AI generated texts. Yesterday, I posted a response, titled “Aspirational Attribution.”
3
3
5
RIP Ken Jacobs. A brilliant filmmaker & wonderful curmudgeon. When I tried to interview him about being arrested for projecting Flaming Creatures, he just said “I don’t want to talk about that anymore.”
1
2
7
My response to Lemley & Ouellette’s defense of academic plagiarism norms. In a nutshell, I’m not convinced they are justified on consequentialist grounds.
I just posted to @ssrn an essay titled Aspirational Attribution: A Response to Lemley & Ouellette, "Plagiarism, Copyright, and AI."
1
3
8
Amen. As is so often the case when it comes to market failures in information, the answer is … nothing. Just make the data open-access.
i keep thinking that PACER can't make it any more painful to access federal court records i was wrong now we've got two-factor authentication to download public documents that should be available without a log-in
1
2
13
Here's a link to "Plagiarism, Copyright, and AI" by Mark Lemley & Lisa Ouellette.
0
0
1
I just posted to @ssrn an essay titled Aspirational Attribution: A Response to Lemley & Ouellette, "Plagiarism, Copyright, and AI."
2
0
3
Odd how so many people stop complaining about the “Lochnerization” of speech regulation when Trump is doing the regulating.
0
0
3
But creativity is probably too much to ask of a district court. At least it’s a pragmatic use of doctrine.
0
0
0
The idea that BAYC tokens are just consumption goods is … unconvincing. People bought them primarily as investments. And I think vertical commonality is pretty obvious. The value of the NFTs depended on Yuga’s promotion of the brand.
1
0
1