WikiBias Profile Banner
WikiBias Profile
WikiBias

@WikiBias

Followers
13K
Following
15K
Media
318
Statuses
1K

Unveiling the Blind Spots: Where Wikipedia's 'Neutral Point of View' Policy Falls Short

The World
Joined September 2024
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@WikiBias
WikiBias
4 days
This reply to @GAZAWOOD1's post on Wikipedia exposes the whole story. It confirms that what researchers and journalists like @shlomitlir, @npovmedia, and @bandlersbanter have asserted is true. @Wikimedia refuses to acknowledge it. Let's hope @USCongress investigates.
19
191
547
@WikiBias
WikiBias
4 days
Wikipedia turns 25 today. Which wrongdoing defines it best? 👇
16
22
89
@WikiBias
WikiBias
6 days
On January 15, English Wikipedia marks its 25th anniversary. This congratulatory note reflects what many think the Wikimedia Foundation should hear.
19
93
321
@WikiBias
WikiBias
8 days
Wikipedia is a platform where virulent anti-Zionist actors operate with minimal restraint, disseminating hostile narratives and fabricating a nonexistent Palestinian national history in entries like “Hellenistic Palestine.”
22
129
881
@WikiBias
WikiBias
11 days
While Palestinian editors take pride in anyone remotely connected to them, they neglect to do so with Sirhan Sirhan, Robert Kennedy's assassin, who was born to a Palestinian family in Jerusalem and stated his solidarity with Palestine. He is presented as Jordanian. A miracle.
37
300
2K
@WikiBias
WikiBias
11 days
Qatar is the top foreign funder of American universities, including programs that encourage students to produce anti-Israel research later quoted on Wikipedia. The data does not include Qatar's concealed funding of hundreds of English and other-language Wikipedia editors. Great
@EFischberger
Eitan Fischberger
13 days
Breaking: The Department of Education just launched a public dashboard showing just how much foreign funding is being injected into American universities. Unsurprisingly, Qatar is in first place with a whopping $6.6 billion. But let's dig deeper into the data, shall we? 🧵
6
54
196
@WikiBias
WikiBias
16 days
Which of the two is Wikipedia and which is Grokipedia? One finds it appropriate to deny documented facts and effectively act as a spokesperson for the organization involved. The other states the facts as they are.
7
38
184
@WikiBias
WikiBias
19 days
In Hebrew, the word for truth is אמת: it begins with the first letter of the alphabet, א, passes through the middle letter, מ, and ends with the last, ת. That’s how truth works: history cannot be invented; it must have a true beginning and a real path. Happy New Year🥳🍾🎈
4
22
171
@LizaRosen0000
Liza Rosen
21 days
BREAKING: The UN is shutting down its Hamas terror-agency UNRWA — after Western countries finally cut funding,.
578
3K
11K
@WikiBias
WikiBias
20 days
One concern of biased Wikipedia editors is undermining the Jewish connection to the land of Israel by presenting a Palestinian history instead. This ahistorical, absurd claim is spreading, despite millennia of Jewish presence, documented in Hebrew biblical place names.
@Malcolm_Pal9
𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐦
28 days
The cities of occupied Palestine🇵🇸 before colonization.
54
190
931
@WikiBias
WikiBias
20 days
Antisemitism in Islam is a serious theological and social problem. Over centuries, it has led to Jewish oppression, forced displacement, violence, and, at times, mass killings. Grokipedia reflects this reality. Wikipedia conceals it. Why?
8
102
506
@MaxNordau
Max 📟
24 days
Wikipedia on Somaliland: "a partially recognised state" Wikipedia on Palestine: "a country" @AshleyRindsberg @bandlersbanter @lsanger
102
249
3K
@WikiBias
WikiBias
25 days
Wikipedia's politicization of knowledge is spreading. Historical fact: Jesus was a Jew in the Roman province of Judea. The name Palestine was imposed a century after Jesus, specifically to erase Jewish identity. Using "Palestine" for 30 AD is an act of colonial erasure.
30
102
537
@WikiBias
WikiBias
27 days
For those who haven't been naughty this year, Merry Christmas!
5
19
126
@WikiBias
WikiBias
29 days
@DrJacobsRad Wikipedia's anti-Jewish prejudice is evident by downplaying antisemitism accusations against Francesca Albanese, attributing them only to “pro-Israel organizations,” while portraying her defenders as “scholars of antisemitism” rather than pro-Palestinian supporters.
5
48
279
@WikiBias
WikiBias
29 days
WikiBias: Admin Black Kite shields pro-Hamas, topic-banned paid editor Iskandar at Arbitration, She does so audaciously without reading the complaint, attacking the filer instead of addressing violations such as undermining the Jewish historical connection to the Land of Israel.
17
120
595