RT @mcgillsim: @RC_SimSummit kicks off day 2 with a stimulating conversation on thinking differently about simulation based assessments. Wh….

RT @WalterTava: Tomorrow @TestTransformed (Dr. Matt Lineberry) and I, with help from @rbrydges, talk about "thinking "differently about sim….

RT @sood_lonika: knowledge translation to HPE by Glenn Regehr #mhpeconf2021 @uicdme

The key takeaway for me here is, when comparing survey results across groups or across time, "a unitary concept of change is inappropriate and may be seriously misleading.". @jbfromks @kristaeckels.

#MedEd research friends: here's a killer #BlastFromThePast!. I adore their insights on "change concepts" in longitudinal survey research - and despair how little this thinking gets applied after *45* years. DM for the PDF!.@mededdoc @sherbino @TChanMD .

If you wanted a slick video about how learners and educators misunderstand #LearningStyles, @veritasium has a slick video for you hot off the press!.#MedEd . @TChanMD @sherbino @mededdoc @mpusic.

Spam is getting so much better. After all, I wasn't sure I was okay before, but now thanks to spam, I know it is all going to be alright. 😉

Thanks so much for the awesome surprise P&T gift, @DougGirod, @KUEVC_Simari, and all!. This goes perfectly with the terrific Jayhawk kicks I got myself to celebrate!. @KUMedCenter @UnivOfKansas

We can do killer #MedEd #dataviz in good old #Excel. @kristaeckels and I built this for Central Line training. Educators pick what to highlight: did post-test hit the goal? Any weird pre-post *drops*? Etc. Normal human-speak observations they'd consider significant auto-appear.

Twitter friends, I need your help! . I work with a magnificent Ph.D. student who needs to interview just a couple of nurses who serve on a Code Blue team for her #qualitative research seminar. Do you know a person she could reach out to? #MedEd.

RT @mededdoc: It's official->our @GWSMHS Office of Evaluation is looking to hire a highly skilled & motivated team player to join our group….

RT @mededdoc: My Office of #Evaluation at @GWSMHS will be looking for a full-time #data #analyst to help with instructor, course & curricul….

RT @HarvardMacy: What are we reading in our #HMIAssessment Journal Club #4 today?. Reed, McNicholas, Woodcock, Issen, & Bell in @BMJ_Qual_S….

RT @HarvardMacy: This week we will share #HMICommunity blog posts written by #HMIAssessment faculty or scholars!. Today we spotlight Louis….

RT @HarvardMacy: This week we offer new #MedEdPearls by @2LindaMLove! . She offers "10 Habits for Career Success in Health Professions Edu….

RT @HarvardMacy: @harvardmed_cme @AretzT Thank you for tweeting about our virtual Oct 2020 #HMIAssessment @harvardmed_cme course!. We have….

With the power of a journal's prestige comes responsibility. Without simultaneously-published and integrated peer-review/debate, this article gets a patina of "good science" that it doesn't deserve. That detracts from discourse rather than contributing to it. 5/5.

#3: It's conjecture, but I am very skeptical that this got a proper peer review. Clinical journals publishing #MedEd papers, #MedHistory, etc. can broaden minds - but must recognize, your usual "bench" of reviewers and editors probably won't know how to evaluate those. 4/.

With an article like this, it's like hearing one end of a phone conversation - but acting like it's a "whole" usable unit of scholarly information. What we really need is to see point-counterpoint, preferably integrated. 3/.

#2: Debate on articles needs to be more prominent. If I land on the article in question above, I can see a big Altmetric score but no sense of the "valence" of that conversation. If I get the PDF, I get no link to or indication of a larger debate. 2/.