Delighted to lend my voice and write the scripts and blog for @easportsf1 #F125's deep dives 🗣️

Trust the process ✌️

Alpine 🤝 Franco 🇦🇷 ☑️ 2026 ☑️ #F125 Here's your first look at @FranColapinto's debut @F1 Driver Ratings as he makes the step up to @AlpineF1Team in next week's #F125 patch 🇦🇷 📕 Patch Notes: https://t.co/oiRK641w6T

We have been blessed with an all-timer @Starjunk95 ⭐

This is such an exciting driving pairing for a lot of reasons but three huge ones IMO: - Two drivers with proven track records at massive teams - Undoubtedly big sponsorship investment from Checo's side - Social media master in Valtteri bringing more eyes to the team/sport

TLDR - There's enough misinformation out there already and if you, as a Creator, want to be held in the same regard as respected journalists in your field; pause your recording, do a bit of research, and fact-check yourself before editing and posting to your channel 🙏 // [8/8]

This applies even if it means their commentary results in a negative summary Constructive negative criticism that's accurate is 100x more valuable that misinformed positivity IMO ✅ // [7/8]

In the six years I've worked with Creators, those I hold in the highest regard are the ones who spend the time to challenge their perceptions, expand their understanding, and in-turn help foster a positive and constructive discussion on their chosen topic // [6/8]

This applies to Creators of all sizes but those with the biggest voices have the responsibility to spend the relative short amount of time to do their due diligence on what they're reporting - especially when that amounts to a Google search or 5-min trawl through Reddit // [5/8]

This is doubly problematic if the content performs well, leading to a false perception of 'Oh damn, this video banged - better do it again!' And yes, platforms like YouTube and its algorithm don't help but don't let that be your excuse // [4/8]

Low-effort research video ▶️ Misleading community perception/engagement ▶️ Broader community adoption of that narrative ▶️ Secondary channels report the same misinformation ▶️ Becomes 'fact' as a result ▶️ Generation of more low-effort research videos 🔁 // [3/8]

Complacency can come in multiple forms but the one that irks me the most relates to posts that lack just a basic level of research, resulting in a dangerous cycle ⬇️ // [2/8]

Some shower thoughts/advice I felt compelled to share: ‼️ Creators - no matter your size, don't get complacent with your content ‼️ Seeing an alarming influx of poorly researched content being churned out recently, particularly with 'piece to camera' videos in gaming // [1/8]

?????

👀👀👀

The pitlane road is super long at Silverstone, surely it should be based on the Safety Car line rather than the pit entry line

If Crawford gets a pen for that VSC pitstop that will be a terrible injustice. What's he supposed to do, cut across the grass?!

Imagine spending years on restoring a Formula 1 car, to then then get robbed Everyone at @SilverstoneUK please keep an eye out for, he's stolen the Leyton House steering wheel at the @F1 Historic display at 1:35pm Any information please report to Silverstone staff & security🙏

Why is nobody talking about this? Franco has done his five races, so Jack should be back in the seat - right? Are we just forgetting that? https://t.co/Fg5aHV5y6G

Looking forward to seeing Doohan back in that second seat now that Colpainto's temporary substitution is complete 👌

Absolutely incredible - #F125 doing numbers. FYI this is a franchise record for @EASPORTSF1 topping out at 149,091 concurrent viewers on a MONDAY. Closest second is F1 2020, which peaked in lockdown at 125K.