StanLRev Profile Banner
Stanford Law Review Profile
Stanford Law Review

@StanLRev

Followers
16K
Following
400
Media
60
Statuses
1K

A legal publication run by @StanfordLaw students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary. Tweets and RTs are not endorsements.

Stanford, CA
Joined March 2011
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
16 days
SLR’s summer submission cycle will open on Friday, July 18, at 5:00 PM PT. We will be accepting general submissions as well as submissions for our Symposium Issue—The APA at Eighty: What’s Next for Administrative Law? We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis!.
1
1
4
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
22 days
@linamkhan @saalevine @stephtngu @bd_highsmith @Aad_Pad In the second Note, @wdweightman (SLS ’25) examines the history, structure, and merits of municipal public banking.
0
2
5
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
22 days
@linamkhan @saalevine @stephtngu @bd_highsmith @Aad_Pad In the first Note, David Toppelberg (SLS ’25) presents how unions can facilitate and benefit from direct democracy.
2
0
2
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
22 days
@linamkhan @saalevine @stephtngu @bd_highsmith In the second Article, @aad_pad warns how some circuit judges have taken Garland v. Ming Dai to remove reasoned decision-making requirements for agency deportation decisions.
1
3
3
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
22 days
@linamkhan @saalevine @stephtngu In the first Article, @bd_highsmith suggests that “company towns” can be understood as a distinctive democratic phenomenon and persist due to developments in local government law.
1
3
14
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
22 days
In a Feature, @linamkhan, @saalevine, and @stephtngu review the FTC’s changes under their leadership to better rein in data abuses.
1
6
20
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
22 days
Volume 77, Issue 6 is now live on our website!.
1
0
4
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
2 months
@adamgcrews In the third Note, @Victor_Y_Wu (SLS ’25) surveys states’ water-pollution permit programs to suggest widespread underenforcement by the EPA.
0
2
6
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
2 months
@adamgcrews In the second Note, Ross Snyder (SLS ’25) & Lilly Weidhaas (SLS ’25) examine the recent expansion of legislative privilege by appellate opinions on redistricting challenges.
1
0
3
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
2 months
@adamgcrews In the first Note, Mahshad Badii (SLS ’25) explores the history and authority of the Merger Guidelines.
1
0
1
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
2 months
In an Article, @adamgcrews reviews and evaluates jurists’ differing conceptions of Vermont Yankee.
1
1
1
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
2 months
Volume 77, Issue 5 is now live on our website!.
1
1
5
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
2 months
Stanford Law Review Online is now accepting submissions for our Special Symposium through May 23. Please see the Online Essay Submissions page for more information and to submit your piece. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis!
1
1
1
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
3 months
@NicholasBednar @Melvin_IV @suzyorke In a Note, Jacqueline Ivey Lewittes evaluates whether an amendment to a habeas petition pending on appeal triggers AEDPA’s second or successive bar.
0
1
1
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
3 months
@NicholasBednar @Melvin_IV In the third Article, @suzyorke assesses the absence of interpretive canons for judicial opinions.
1
2
2
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
3 months
@NicholasBednar In the second Article, @Melvin_IV argues that community development is a legitimate tactic under the FHA for redressing the harms of segregation.
1
1
3
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
3 months
In the first Article, @NicholasBednar explores how administrative capacity limits presidential power.
1
1
1
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
3 months
Volume 77, Issue 4 is now live on our website!.
1
1
3
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
3 months
Manuscripts may be submitted from May 12 to May 23. Accepted essays will be published in Stanford Law Review Online.
0
0
0
@StanLRev
Stanford Law Review
3 months
We are excited to announce our Special Symposium in partnership with the Stanford Neukom Center for the Rule of Law: “100 Days of The Trump Administration: Constitutional Boundaries on Executive Power & the Rule of Law.”
1
5
4