Dan Huff
@RealDanHuff
Followers
5K
Following
693
Media
28
Statuses
197
Joined February 2017
@DOGE, a single district judge has issued a ruling blocking the executive branch from access to Treasury data. There’s a simple fix: DOJ should demand injunction bonds. 1/.
732
6K
21K
Right and had they bothered to do their jobs they would also have found Frimpong was Tony West’s deputy in the massive settlement fund scandal where DOJ required settling defendants to pay over $2 billion to liberal political activist groups.
Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, a Biden appointee, is set to issue a sweeping decision to block Presdent Trump’s immigration enforcement. Frimpong only became a judge because over 20 Republicans— including Idaho Senator Jim Risch — did not show up to vote against her.
1
3
8
Forget you guys, the government needs to start asking these! It’s 10 bc only locker numbers that are perfect squares stay open since they don’t have an offsetting factor pair. 6 (6,1 3,2) vs 4 (4,1 2,2).
Fun fact: in the v early days of Coinbase we required applicants to answer riddles before hiring. Here's an example, see if you can solve it. I think we may have borrowed this question from @Airbnb. Always wondered whether we should bring these back.
0
0
1
Injunction bonds would have stopped this because the bond requirement applies to temporary restraining orders too. AG Bondi needs to be pushing bonds. The Supreme Court injunction decision is not nearly enough.
2
4
17
“Whales that surface get harpooned” my latest in @nypost Where DOGE went wrong and how to fix it. Link in comments.
1
0
8
It’s even worse than that. Importing welfare cases is actually against the law. Since the 1800s, federal law has banned immigrants “likely at any time to become a public charge.”But defiant bureaucrats, complicit presidents and activist judges have ensured it’s not enforced.
What do these districts have in common?. Extremely large immigrant populations, which should make us question how our immigration policies are increasing the cost of our welfare state. We are importing poverty.
0
0
9
Actually was in there but the parliamentarian ruled it out of order.
One provision that didn't make it into the Big Beautiful bill, but should have:. If you are over the age of 21 and you go to Disney World but you don't have children, you go straight to Alligator Alcatraz 👇
0
2
6
Just as I predicted in my previous post. That’s why you also need to be demanding injunction bonds with specific cost estimates. Rule 65(c) is clear that bonds are mandatory and must cover actual costs. Litigate that to the top and you’ll win.
The ink is barely dry on SCOTUS’s decision striking down universal injunctions, yet rogue district judges are continuing with business as usual—issuing universal injunctions under the guise of “class actions” that cover anyone and everyone in the world. SCOTUS must end the.
2
6
29
Justice Alito’s concurrence warns of this loophole: “Lax enforcement of the requirements for third-party standing and class certification would create a potentially significant loophole to today’s decision.” To prevent this, DOJ should demand injunction bonds, which apply to.
🚨 Supreme Court delivers big blow to the national injunctions racket. Holds injunctions cannot be “broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue.” Watch for activist judges to subvert the ruling w/ class action certifications etc.
1
2
22
🚨 Supreme Court delivers big blow to the national injunctions racket. Holds injunctions cannot be “broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue.” Watch for activist judges to subvert the ruling w/ class action certifications etc.
2
9
45
Some say @JDVance should unilaterally overrule Parliamentarian’s advice in his role as Senate’s Presiding officer. This was most famously done by VP Rockefeller in 1975. But that ruling pertained to senate filibuster procedures. Legislative policy would be new ground.
The Senate Parliamentarian is ripping the conservative heart out of the Budget Bill. Her weapon is the Byrd Rule. Here’s how it works. 1/.
1
2
22
The Parliamentarian needs to reconsider some of her rulings here /12.
0
0
22
The Byrd Rule test is whether the policy change outweighs the budgetary impact. Enforcing the bond rule is not a policy change by definition. And it would save billions. 11/.
1
1
18
A principled Parliamentarian will disappoint both parties, but some of MacDonough’s recent rulings are plain error, most obviously the one on injunction bonds. 10/.
1
0
20
The Senate Majority Leader may dismiss the Parliamentarian, as seen in 1987 (Robert Byrd) and 2001 (Trent Lott). Such actions remain rare and controversial. 9/.
1
0
15