Reading: 10 tweets of reflection and exhortation.
About 5 years ago, I was listening to Tim Keller do an interview, I think with Desiring God. One of the questions they asked Tim was, “what’s the single greatest piece of advice you would give to young Christian men?” (1)
Turns out there is something much, much better on Sunday mornings. Praise God for his sovereign grace. All you who know the Lord, praise him for undeserved, unmerited sovereign grace.
Respectfully to paedobaptist brethren:
If your theological reasoning requires wine for the Lord’s Supper but doesn’t require immersion for baptism, then your theological reasoning has a major contradiction
But if I could encourage you, ordinary Christian, towards any goal next year, alongside the ordinary public and private means of grace, it’s to start reading and find a way to do it consistently. (10/end)
-the sabbath is grounded in creation
-the sabbath expectation exists before the giving of the Law on Sinai
-Jesus declares himself Lord of the sabbath
-Jesus is clear that he by no means abolishes any of God’s moral law
-there remains a sabbath rest for the people of God
@BethMooreLPM
@ostrachan
Beth, unless you spent the last 40 years preaching Sunday morning from the pulpit in the fuctional role of an elder, I see a massive disconnect between what Owen said in his article and what you are saying in response
In most ways I am a baby Christian. Im just a 30 year old layman with 3 crazy little kids and a full time job. But I desperately want to know and love God more and live a life that honors him. God help me in this pursuit because most days I fail at it. (9)
It’s interesting how so many modern evangelicals have demystified baptism and the Lord’s Supper into bare ceremonies but have become hyper-mystical in seeking to encounter the Spirit through emotive worship songs, and seeking signs from God in life decisions, etc
Hot take: if someone was baptized following what was at the time deemed a credible profession of faith, they never should (nor actually can) be “rebaptized” if they later determine that they don’t think they were truly born again at the time of the first baptism
One problem with dispensational premillennialism is it imposes a hermaneutic onto the OT that is utterly foreign to the hermaneutic used by Christ and the Apostles.
We must take our cues on interpreting Scripture from Scripture itself.
1689 baptists: *attempt to exist*
Random cage stage reformed who shares confessions with liberal denominations and who’s *conservative* denomination allowed Revoice to happen: “BaPtIsTs ArE lIkE TrAnS pPl
“Believers do not obtain salvation because they believe, but because Christ has merited it for them. He applies it to them through the instrumentality of faith.”
For an accessible yet thorough explanation of the historic Baptist confessional view of covenant theology, see Sam Renihan’s “The Mystery of Christ His Covenant & His Kingdom
What in the actual heck does a normal Christian of reformed persuasion have to do in 2023 to get a modern work that doesn’t have a violation of the 2nd commandment on the cover?
Baptistic
Congregational
Calvinistic
Covenantal (1689 Fed)
Amillenial (2K)
Sacramental (reformed)
Credal
Classical theism
This is the way. Of me at least.
“Calvinism + maybe a few other little things”. This guy is clueless.
-Christology
-regulative principle
-covenantal
-real spiritual presence
-Credal
-law gospel distinction
…I could go on. But according to attention seeking anon it’s just little things
The reason I won't call "reformed" baptists Reformed is:
1. They didn't call themselves that until recently
2. Calling them that reduces the definition of "Reformed" to predestination plus MAYBE a few other little things
If baptism mechanically imparts regenerative grace then it is unloving not to baptize *everyone’s* children. Heck everyone themselves. Literally baptize the nations, whether they consent or not. Why would you deny them what they most need?
Idk which baptists need to hear this - there is one covenant household and it is only the Church. There is one covenant children and it is only those born of the Spirit of God
Just a reminder to all my Reformed friends - Johnson and Strachan are not reformed/particular/1689 Baptists, nor do they represent our confession, our doctrine of God, our theology proper, etc
Amil because it holds a consistent, proper, and historical hermaneutic across the entire canon. In other words, it gives the fairest treatment to the entire canon of scripture and does not violate the analogy of faith
I’m really grateful for my church’s pastor. His name is Seth Channell. He’s not really on social media. He wouldn’t call himself a theologian. But man, he preaches the word. He loves the Lord. He faithfully plods. He guards the flock. He sets an example to emulate.
Presbyterian friends -
Are your baptized children “in Adam” and therefore children under wrath until they receive the gift of regeneration and its fruit - faith & repentance - which effects union with Christ, remission of sins, and forensic righteousness?
So what if we stopped looking for hermeneutical loopholes to avoid obeying 10% of God’s eternal moral law, called the sabbath a delight, and enjoyed the blessing that God has for those who keep it?
For those unaware, the official Honey Badger Baptist position on the Lord’s Supper is a true spiritual presence of Christ in Elements and is identical to Calvin and the Reformed Orthodox
Kim Riddlebarger:
“Christ is not returning to set up a half-way kingdom that itself has to be redeemed at the end of 1000 years. He’s coming back to raise the dead, judge the world, and make all things new”
“Those who are known by God most certainly must depart from iniquity. Whomever God chooses unto salvation, He also chooses unto holiness. The sanctification of the elect is the evidence that God has chosen them”
Infant baptism is still a part and pillar of popery
Baptists throughout history have still declared unity with those Protestants who, along with baptizing babies, proclaim Wholesome Protestant Doctrine
So take off the sectarian modernity bias and don’t be a jerk
Baptists throwing away baptistic convictions and the entire theological underpinning of the tradition over a few grams of ethanol in their communion cup will be, well, really really dumb
Nothing has made a bigger difference I don’t think, in my understanding of the Bible and it’s doctrines, my awe towards God and understanding of who He is, my love for the Church, and my joy in, desire for and hunger for communion with God, than this habit of reading has. (8)
Sam Renihan:
"We thus use the covenant of redemption, not the Abrahamic covenant, as the pattern for covenant membership in the new covenant because that is where Christ’s federal headship is established."
Renihan with a very important observation about the change in the 2LC from “good and necessary consequences” (WCF) to “necessarily contained”
He asserts the baptists changed the wording to retrieve a distinguishing between biblical reasoning and unaided human reasoning (1/9)
It’s so interesting how every great Reformed theologian lays out a beautiful treatment of biblical baptism, how God uses it as a sacrament unto believers, how all of its benefits are clearly ascertained through faith, and then conclude also do this to your babies cus circumcision
I’ll gather in a converted Pizza Hut, if that’s where the gospel is faithfully preached and the sacraments rightly administered. Give me beautiful architecture but never at the expense of the right worship of the true church
@ifffster
With all due respect brother, thousands of pages have been published on this. Asking folks to give Twitter-sized answers to this is like asking someone to stick an elephant in their kitchen sink
A couple more reasons baptists do not baptize infants:
1) they understand typological relationships
2) they do not conflate the precepts of separate positive laws
Aside from Scripture, here are the books I read in 2021. It’s small compared to many of you, but I praise God that so much has been preserved in writing throughout church history, and is accessible for an average layman like me. Looking forward for more great reading in 22!
Some Presbyterians will see the covenantal, Calvinistic, credal, regulative principled, sabbatarian, 2CV-upholding baptists and be like, “nah, we’re way more like Lutherans cus of the babies”
If John Owen and Thomas Goodwin managed to defy old age and live another 100 years into the 18th century, their theological trajectory would have literally just been John Gill
But just so we’re clear:
Canons of Dort 1.11
And as God himself is most wise, unchangeable, omniscient and omnipotent, so the election made by him can neither be interrupted nor changed, recalled or annulled; neither can the elect be cast away, nor their number diminished.
Is baptism an act of obedience, which the baptizant “does”? In some sense yes.
But the main and much richer emphasis is what God has done (which baptism signifies) and what God does, through baptism, when it’s benefits are apprehended by faith
Dr Cooper: “let me tell you about what Lutherans have confessed for 500 years”
Christian Twitter: “what is this new doctrine whereof thou speakest? For thou bringest certain strange things to our ears”
Paedobaptists: “baptists are schismatics! By definition they can’t be catholic!”
Also paedobaptists: “baptists are quick to appropriate theological truths from other traditions throughout church history! Ha! They’re so lame!”
J. Renihan:
“It must be noted that at least the 1644 edition of the 1LBC is the product of untrained theologians-men who didn’t have any specific theological instruction in the universities. these were not Puritan worthies, whose books were famous; they were laymen… (1/2)
To describe oneself as “reformed”, among other things, is to make a commitment to certain beliefs about Christology, Law/Gospel distinction, Theology Proper, the real sacramental presence of Christ, redemptive-historical hermeneutics, and the regulative principle of worship.
If you’re Anglican, be Anglican. If we wanted a generic Evangelical experience we would go to a Baptist church. Anglicans are constantly trying to be what they aren’t or are ashamed and apologizing for what they are. It’s tiring.
I have a legitimate question for my Presbyterian/reformed friends; not a “gotcha” in any way, and will not invoke any contrarian response from me, I’m just genuinely curious:
Paul could not be much more clear: the Church is the true Israel as they are one with Christ who is the true Israel. Physical Israel is typological of true (spiritual) Israel.
The 7th day sabbath was tied to the act of creation. God blessed and hallowed the day. He possessed it uniquely.
The 1st day sabbath is tied to the act of new creation. The resurrection of Christ is a first fruits. (1 Cor 15:23). Christ possesses it uniquely (Rev 1:10). (1/2)