
NeuroImage
@NeuroImage_EiC
Followers
374
Following
4
Media
14
Statuses
49
Joined April 2023
So @SfNtweets, are we related? Because you've got some Elsevier DNA in your operation. Hopefully you're following our lead & increase your fees regularly. Oh you do? Great! Welcome to the (Gentleman's) club.
0
0
0
I'll tell you what it could fund: 160 NeuroImage papers. Or 143 in Human Brain Mapping but you get more bang for your buck with us.
@threadreaderapp @perpl_lab @jdavidjentsch I'm having a hard time understanding this figure. Is there a better explanation than "that's what CEOs are paid"? Can you convince me that no one who would accept a salary of, say, $200,000 could do a fine job directing SfN? Imagine what the delta of $551,996 could fund.
0
0
2
Okay, so we use free labor with 40% profit, dismiss the scientific community, and take as much of your funding as we can, but at least we're not the tenured faculty at @ColumbiaPSYC - they're on a different level.
Today I learned that @Columbia will not be promoting me or putting me up for tenure. I have multiple active grants (including an R01 and a CAREER award) plenty of publications, a teaching award, and a history of DEI advocacy. Open to all opportunities in and out of academia.
0
0
8
Everyone: “I’m so excited about @ImagingNeurosci, sign me up as a reviewer when it launches!”. Everyone I ask to review for the journal now that it has actually launched:
0
0
2
We are so proud to be providing resources for nurses. And our journals have so many valuable discoveries that are crucial for patient health. How valuable? $3,400 of value. Such a bargain.
To mark International Nurses Day, Elsevier Health is proud to launch our new ‘Resource for Nurses’ page, bringing together insights and videos that support self-care, role recognition and professional development. Click here:
0
0
0
We are very grateful for our talented interim team. Being despised by your peers is a small price to pay when you get 10% off Elsevier access fees.
@NeuroImage_EiC The interim editors have been assigned: All seem to be already working for an elsevier journal.
0
0
2
We would like to remind the 870 reviewers that they not in an exclusive relationship.
It was amazing to see the massive support this week for this big change - thank you. And huge thank you to the 870 people who already signed up to review for Imaging Neuroscience!.Can we make it a thousand? :-).
0
0
3
We applaud @OHBM and @wileyinresearch for sticking to their guns with their (higher) $3,850 APC.
1
0
16
We know this was 5 years ago, but if you were one of the 98 who voted 'NeuroImage', we now consider this binding and really, really need you to submit and cough-up.
Hypothetically speaking, if the whole editorial board of NeuroImage quit working for Elsevier and started a new open access journal (so without Impact Factor for at least 3 years) published/managed by OHBM, would you submit your papers to:.
2
7
63