NFLAgents_net Profile Banner
Joel E. Turner Profile
Joel E. Turner

@NFLAgents_net

Followers
2K
Following
45K
Media
384
Statuses
19K

NFLPA Certified Contract Advisor since 1999

South Carolina, USA
Joined August 2012
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@MattBrownEP
Matt Brown
1 day
We could legitimately hit $200M in coaching buyouts this hiring cycle, roughly "one Florida athletic department" worth of dead money. I'm starting to think this isn't going to stop, even with schools needing to pay their players. Money isn't real.
5
8
86
@DarrenHeitner
Darren Heitner
1 day
🚨 Attention future D-I athletes! This only applies to compensation specifically for name, image, and likeness (#NIL) usage. Getting paid for other things? We can argue why this does not and cannot apply.
@theCSCommission
College Sports Commission
1 day
🚨 Attention future D-I athletes! The CSC has new resources to help high school and junior college prospective student-athletes and prospective transfer student-athletes stay compliant with NIL rules. Protect your eligibility—get the info you need below ⬇️
1
7
31
@DanielLibit
Daniel Libit
1 day
NEW: Come on down, @MillerMoss: You're the next contestant on The Price (of the House v. NCAA injunctive relief) Is Right. House class counsel has asked court to add the @LousvilleFB star quarterback as a representative. My story for @Sportico👇 https://t.co/m0xzUCvXVz
Tweet card summary image
sportico.com
Moss, who wrote his senior thesis on NCAA amateurism rules, will be the sole active college athlete representing the House injunctive relief class.
3
24
57
@NCAASettlement
NCAA Settlement Reporter
16 days
The NCAA’s landmark “House” settlement lets colleges pay athletes directly for their name, image & likeness starting July 2025, creating a $2.8B fund for past players and sparking clashes with state NIL laws as Congress eyes national regulation. [NCSL, June 2025]
0
2
5
@NCAASettlement
NCAA Settlement Reporter
14 days
HEARING IN CHALMERS V #NCAAF A hearing has been set for 12/8/25! Remember this appeal could have huge ramifications on #HouseVsNCAA!
1
1
2
@NCAASettlement
NCAA Settlement Reporter
13 days
Interesting article from @JSONline on how the @UWBadgers are embracing the #NIL era... including dedicated #NIL infrastructure, negotiating 3rd-party NIL deals in the face of competition from larger spenders
0
2
2
@NCAASettlement
NCAA Settlement Reporter
11 days
In August, the @NatUrbanLeague released a statement calling the #HouseVsNCAA settlement "Unjust & Discriminatory", saying it perpetuates systemic inequities by disproportionately benefiting male athletes in high-revenue sports (ex: football and men’s bball), while marginalizing
0
1
1
@NCAASettlement
NCAA Settlement Reporter
12 days
Per Dentons, the new #HousevsNCAA settlement is widening the talent gap in college sports as P5 schools can afford to share significantly more of their athletic revenue w/ athletes. Remember, the settlement caps rev sharing @ 22.5%, but P5 programs have much larger revenue than
1
2
5
@NCAASettlement
NCAA Settlement Reporter
8 days
REFERRAL DEALZZZ! Several #HouseVsNCAA claim buyers are offering athletes commissions to refer their teammates and friends... The referrals can be a good way to make some cash, but IMO each referrer should FULLY DISCLOSE their commission to the seller!
1
1
2
@NCAASettlement
NCAA Settlement Reporter
8 days
3RD PARTY #NIL DEALS! 🚨 Great article by NIL Revolution on @Deloitte's framework for reviewing #NIL deals: 1. Payor association check – Is the payor “associated” with the school (e.g., contributes > $50k, employs school-connected persons)? 2. Business purpose validation
1
3
3
@NCAASettlement
NCAA Settlement Reporter
7 days
WE HAVE THE FIRST OPENING BRIEF! On Oct 25th, the appellants represented by @MoloLamken have filed their opening brief in their appeal of the #HouseVsNCAA settlement!
0
1
1
@NCAASettlement
NCAA Settlement Reporter
1 day
OPENING BRIEFS! Opening briefs for the #HouseVsNCAA appeals have been filed! @McCannSportsLaw already has a piece out discussing the appeals that I'd highly suggest everyone reads!
0
3
9
@WinterSportsLaw
Mit Winter
1 day
This does a good job of explaining why many P4 basketball teams have smaller rev share budgets than some Big East teams and other teams in non-football conferences. It also explains how they have to use third party NIL dollars to fill the gap.
@NashvilleNBI
Nashville Basketball Initiative
1 day
Roster costs exploded entering the 2025-26 season prior to the House settlement implementation. In order to compete, legal third-party NIL is necessary. We must build out opportunities for student-athletes as the coaching staff works to build the 2026-27 roster. The cap that
3
5
25
@EricJBlevins
Eric Blevins
1 day
The CSC just issued new guidance on NIL deals, and it will be interesting to see whether these disclosure rules end up in court: athletes must report all deals over $600 within 5 days or lose eligibility. The NCAA has had some notable success shielding other eligibility rules
2
2
7
@DarrenHeitner
Darren Heitner
2 days
I never want to hear a single complaint from anyone at these schools about athlete compensation. Not now, not ever.
@FOS
Front Office Sports
2 days
College football buyouts have hit nearly $185M this season. • Brian Kelly (LSU), $53M • James Franklin (Penn State), $49.7M • Billy Napier (Florida), $21.2M • Hugh Freeze (Auburn), $15.4M • Mike Gundy (OSU), $15M • Sam Pittman (Arkansas), $9.8M • DeShaun Foster (UCLA)
21
94
503
@WinterSportsLaw
Mit Winter
4 days
Another school is moving the commercial/revenue producing operations of its athletic department to a new private entity. I expect many other schools to do this. It’ll presumably be the entity that contracts with athletes for rev share $. Can also employ athletes.
@PeteThamel
Pete Thamel
4 days
News: Michigan State’s board approved today the initiation of “Spartan Ventures,” following the lead of Clemson and others to form an independent company outside the athletic department with a focus on maximizing revenue.
5
15
64
@bportnoy15
Ben Portnoy
5 days
More College Sports Commissioner news today: The CSC released a finalized version of its rules resulting from the House settlement and now codified into NCAA bylaw. Below is the five-page summary doc that was just released (More detailed version is available on CSC's website):
2
16
48
@DanielLibit
Daniel Libit
5 days
NEW: After failed merger w/ @AthleteNIL & fallout over its controversial (and reportedly kaput) Oregon State deal, does NIL firm Blueprint Sports have a future? @PoweredByBPS CEO Rob Sine expressed continued optimism–at least last week. For @Sportico👇 https://t.co/OPAZRVBBxr
Tweet card summary image
sportico.com
After the failed merger with SANIL and the fallout from its disputed Oregon State contract, does the former NIL collective operator have a future?
2
4
17
@ryanpmulvaney
Ryan P. Mulvaney
5 days
All schools now:
@WinterSportsLaw
Mit Winter
6 days
The NCAA has adopted emergency legislation specifying DI athletes can lose eligibility if NIL deals aren’t reported. If a school discovers an athlete may not have reported a deal it has 2 days to review & report to the CSC. If a deal isn’t then reported, athlete is ineligible.
0
1
11