Monali C. Rahalkar
@MonaRahalkar
Followers
8K
Following
37K
Media
2K
Statuses
31K
Scientist in the area of methanotrophs, methane mitigation. Investigating the truth about covid-19 virus origins. Tweeting in my personal capacity.
Joined July 2020
How an Indian scientist couple worked to trace origin, course of COVID-19
50
481
1K
So people who think that many of us are not virologists and so our comments in the origins questions are not significant. But we are by profession molecular biologists, so we can very well understand what’s going on. Stop under estimating. We r doing it for the truth to come out.
18
26
261
5
6
211
Peter Daszak was talking about recombinant viruses with SARS like signs. Fifty plus strains of sars like corona viruses. Not responding to monoclonal Ab. Date was 21st November 2019. Exact at the start of this pandemic! Still nothing to look, nothing to see and nothing to ask!
10
72
161
Sunday Times news on covid origins: Mojiang mine again!
9
44
160
@ydeigin @VanityFair @BretWeinstein There is also no mention of us. We published the link of Mojiang, RaTG13 and the miners pneumonia back in May 2020. I send Katherine Eban, writer, a detailed response by email!.
9
26
150
After studying the spike protein of RaTG13, SARS2 and BANAL-52, I noted the following. At the amino-acid level RaTG13 and BANAL-52 are virtually identical, except at the most important part, the RBM, highlighted in brown (438-508). In this region Banal and SARS2 are identical.
2
45
151
Ten to 25% divergent S protein is exactly how the RaTG13 and CoV-2 is. They wanted to check in hACE2 mouse and human airway cells! (This was Nov 2018, I guess, where they put a renewal proposal).
12
46
133
Dear Indian People, .You must have viewed us or read us. Searching the origins of COVID-19 has been our mission, to seek the truth. We want to know what caused the 3.5 million deaths. Each and every of you should understand the cause and support us. Not getting a penny for this!.
12
35
136
I couldn’t find the online news, but this appeared in today’s newspaper, Times Nation. Succinct.
10
45
119
There is no forensic investigation, no lab checks, no interviews of the staff working in the labs. They should have done this 2 years ago. And checked the labs in China and collaborations. Instead there is absolutely nothing. The case is compulsorily closed leaving us in dismay!.
12
20
116
Release the report what FBI submitted to the US intelligence about covid origins.
9
19
110
I found this mail interesting: Recently exposed by USRTK.
11
34
113
From the Vanity Fair article:. Ralph Baric, mixed components of SARS-like viruses from different species, and created a novel chimera that was able to directly infect human cells. (Baric did not respond to written questions seeking comment.).
10
37
117
Baric admits that in the DEFUSE, the FCS insertion was his idea:
10
49
136
I think that this would be one of the most important email by Daszak to Baric. From White House to other covid committees, Daszak is telling Baric how the narrative is built up and how no one would discuss lab leak any soon.
10
59
114
Absolute silence or no reaction by Daszak on the latest exposure of his projects and reports, the 900 pages document. Similarly no major reaction from any media and the politicians! What does the intelligence say about this evidence?.
8
32
106
Daszak looks certainly panicked and calls my thinking exceptional, after he spies my account and reads my tweets. Look at my tweet. It has pure logic, and Even if 293 did not mean Mojiang, Baric would know the 4991 clade from Mojiang as they were collaborating in 2 projects!
11
35
108
This email says it all. It describes how the current “natural origin” was tried to be proven. In the three bullet points it explains how they went about: mink and raccoons, Banals, RBD in banals and now climate change! Director, actors and the film unfolding in the last 2 yrs.
8
50
102
One more jewel by Zhengli Shi. This time on MERS like cov, and Guangdong province. Look at the methods! Primer walking, Race, for sequencing whole genomes, creating pseudo viruses by adding diff diff spikes, using insect cell lines, bat lung cell lines! .
13
42
105
The very last sentence calls for solidarity and rigorous scientific data. When Peter Daszak is being asked for the rigorous scientific data, has he given that until now? The databases remain shut! In fact, if PD shares the 'real data', the speculations can turn to real Science!.
Authors of a letter, published in February, 2020, in support of professional colleagues in China combatting #COVID19, reaffirm their stance and call for solidarity and rigorous scientific data to determine how #SARS-CoV-2 reached humans. Read
10
28
100
Looking at the recent articles: the two preprints by Worobey, the Gao preprint, Sci American article, MIT Tech Review article, all coming in about a month, the message is clear. The agenda is clear. There is sort of united reaction that they don’t want people to follow it, theEnd.
10
20
94
The mere possibility that it could be a lab derived or a lab grown or a lab collected virus should have been like an alarm or a siren. Instead this alarm was put off by the comforting thought that this could be natural and it happens all the time. By the so called experts!.
11
19
99
I have a strong feeling that if this was a lab leak the lab from which it leaked had research on H7N9. The early patients had this strange vectorised H7N9 hemagglutinin signatures. One reason. Also this:
7
41
103
After reading the article by Jane Qiu, I have no words. Here we have the pandemic killing millions. Then we read about the bat lady and her stories. She still finds joy in catching the bats and playing with the viruses. What is really our future? If such madness doesn't stop. .
11
20
100
Watch me in the Envoye Special by France2!.
Monali Rahalkar, chercheuse indienne, découvre une thèse rédigée en 2013 sur la pneumonie des mineurs du Yunnan. Elle révèle le diagnostic posé par des pneumologues à l’époque :. "Ces clichés des poumons étaient très ressemblants avec ceux des malades du #Covid19." #EnvoyeSpecial
20
22
101
@hholdenthorp @sciencecohen Isn’t this highly misleading that a editor in chief of the journal makes such remarks! Where is any evidence of zoonosis, and the market cases are after December. You are also dishonouring many scientists, people who have collected mounting evidences about research origins.
3
3
99
Looks like they removed the paywall for the article!
10
29
103
Bat man and bat woman with the students and staff! Can you believe they were enjoying in a restaurant on 15 Jan 2020! It looks as if they are vaccinated! No masks either!
8
41
97
Day by day it’s becoming clearer. What really happened… And moreover these people had the NIH grant running, so even if Defuse was not granted, they had a second collaborative project on similar lines!.
You may have heard that a research proposal called DEFUSE lays out a blueprint for the creation of COVID. You may also know that other scientists brush off DEFUSE because the risky virology was to take place in North Carolina. Today new docs obtained by me indicate American
2
29
103
Amazing! First bring bat shit from sarscov hotspots, do genetic manipulation of these viruses in low safety labs, publish papers, then change names of viruses, etc. And two years after a pandemic when you r the prime suspect in a leak, conduct such conferences!!!!.
Wuhan Lab Hosts Conference On How To Avoid Lab Leaks.
7
32
95
Life is becoming hectic day by day. And so I won’t be associated with Drastic group anymore. Of course I won’t be leaving the mission of investigation of Covid19 origins. And will be on Twitter for that! See you around!.
12
8
96
Friends, the Dutch virologist in this mail (@BillyBostickson points out that she is Koopmans, ending the suspense! ) says the word BACKBONE. And insert! Remember she is referring to the FCS or the spike to be the insert and guessing the backbone virus. Already means engineered!.
7
34
85
About the Defuse proposal which was leaked by a whistleblower to Drastic. @CharlesRixey @gdemaneuf @BillyBostickson still remember how shocked we were to read it in Sept 2021, before was released on Drastic website.
A second clip from @SharriMarkson's MUST WATCH documentary. In this clip, @jbkinney talks about the infamous DEFUSE proposal, which provides a blueprint for making SARS-CoV-2!.Watch the full documentary at: (requires a subscription for $6 per month)
10
37
98
@Rossana38510044 @humblesci And this one was the best! He exactly told in simple terms how it can be done! Brilliant!
3
30
94
We are very pleased to share with you our publication in Frontiers in Public Health.
11
41
93
Five years ago, most of us had never read about coronaviruses, gain of function research, chimeric viruses, etc. A pandemic happened. A few of us cared to actually follow its origins. Today we have a bizarre picture of what all goes on behind the scenes, grant proposals, reports.
3
22
97
In the mail to Ralph Baric, Vineet Menachery says:."Alternatively, would you be willing to share the SARS/MERS recombinant plasmid system with him so that they can generate the mutants themselves". What's the recombinant plasmid? This is shocking!.
8
29
87
At least the people who believe that lab origin of the virus is a likely and now more or less “the scenario” of what might have happened, have shown immense daring. We all have shown enough courage to fight our peers, in our own country, internationally, everywhere. We r brave 👍🏼.
8
17
90
People have forgotten 6 million people are dead. I cannot stop demanding for the truth about covid origins. No one can stop me!.
8
16
92
Instead people should congratulate Drastic, as agreed that we are not the top notch coronavirus biologists. But what we as non-experts have analysed is no less than the experts. It’s not important to just get some documents, its important to understand the significance.
13
13
87
I think am almost done here! There is no more to find here. All things are clear! It’s now up to the worlds politicians how to proceed. Unfortunately not in the hands of the public. If the countries are going to remain silent and ignore the circumstancial evidences, I don’t know!.
11
10
88
Daszak looks excited to share this about Fauci: Science had to stay strong! Then can he please disclose all the emails, evidences and databases, eg the WIV?
10
23
89
After reading emails from Morens, mostly Daszak, Keusch and Morens seem to have close friendship; I saw zero reference to the actual pandemic, deaths, etc. It’s all about Daszak’s lost grant, and how to get it back! It’s all money money money! Disgraceful to read! NIH top/ex.
6
14
88
A very sad day indeed! Don’t know if anyone will ever no how this cruel virus came, but I will always try to follow if this was because of a lab accident! Innocent people are dying. 😭And the ones who do such dangerous work get to investigate this! Height of injustice!.
18
10
80
@BiophysicsFL He just forgot to mention that the original Defuse project was released by Drastic, main lead was @CharlesRixey, to whom a brave whistleblower sent it. We analysed the project @BillyBostickson @gdemaneuf and me. This was 2.5 years ago, Sept 2021, when none of the PIs mentioned!.
7
19
87
Still no news from Jon Cohen, the principal science reporter Science magazine @sciencecohen , about the second virus which was supposed to be 96% probably collected from Mojiang. We just know one: RaTG13. From the mail it seems that Daszak spoke to Shi: genomes of 2 viruses.
3
18
81
The story of the Moderna vaccine is impressive! But how did they PREDICT on 13Jan itself that they need to start with the vaccine when there were just pneumonia of unknown etiology? This could have died in Wuhan itself, unless they knew more?
6
33
79
Project DEFUSE documents.Contributions: a brave whistleblower! Analysis: Drastic! Dedicated to: truth seekers of Covid origins and all the victims🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 Truth always Wins.
6
33
78
This was my interview taken by “the Print” and quite a detailed one.
12
18
77
As survivors of the most dangerous pandemic of this era, and witness of so many deaths and disease around, as biology scientists, why cannot we ask these questions directly to the concerned scientists? Why doesn’t Shi Zhengli reply to emails? Why do we need writers in the middle?.
8
19
78
But if “you” all fiddle with Nature and bring bat shit and bats to labs, throw them out for windows, inoculate them in cell lines, humanised mice, etc. it’s “you” who are disturbing the Nature on the name of “Predicting���pandemics and “Defusing” it! Several steps further than that.
The challenge is that it's easier/more comfortable for 'us' to look for 'someone' to blame rather than to confront the difficult alternative that we individually and collectively need to reflect/review/revise how we impact nature, and the consequences. .
4
17
80
Have you read this? Though the WIV1 is SARS-like and not SARS-2 like, the rest is shocking!.
17
31
78
WIV had developed this in 2018. Did they take human trials in 2018-2019?
12
31
74
1. The email exposure of Farrar, Fauci, etc. Clearly shows how they killed the lab hypothesis prematurely! Andersen 2020 paper and the Lancet Calisher note were thrown on public’s face to prove only one fact, the virus was natural, and we should accept this.
4
18
68
Rasmussen again shows what she is by her arrogant statements! The last sentence of her looks even horrible!
15
18
75
You have great sympathy for him! Isn’t it! Why did you all close the debate about the origins, about GoF research? Life wouldn’t have been so tragic if the pandemic didn’t began. If he didn’t sponsor such dangerous research in the first place!.
I have no diagnosis for this, it is incomprehensible : dr Fauci on the rise of fake news, trolls, and the disappearance of truth
8
17
69
The renewal project by Daszak, Shi and Baric submitted to NIAID, Pages 317-528 of the document exposed by Intercept. This was submitted in 2018, and project period started 24/7/2019. This has the real catchy stuff! They clearly say about sequencing the novel sarsrcovs. Last sent
4
24
73
Wish you a happy women’s day to all the wonderful ladies investigating the truth behind COVID-19 origin. 💐💐💐🎊🎊🎊❤️❤️❤️❤️.
2
8
70
I found an old email which I had written to Andersen on 25.03.2020. I also mention that the sequence of the clones in Baric-Shi 2015 paper were not available. And maybe many other people were looking for the sequences too? So they were deposited in the next two months?No reply!
6
20
68
Our paper about the Mojiang mine, RaTG13 (close relative) of SARS2 and the miners illness, WIV involvement, is close to 100K views (105K views plus downloads). Still the mine in question is closed for reporters and samples collected were destroyed. Reason?.
3
19
72
I recommend to read the actual transcribed interview of Ralph Baric, and not just the Vanity Fair article. If you read the actual interview, u would be stunned!.
5
21
76
The Defuse proposal is absolutely right, as Daszak did not protest a word on his Twitter. Instead he retweeted that much of the work was proposed to be done in NCarolina. @Ayjchan The proposal is authentic!.
3
15
73
I have a special request to all Indians who are watching the TV shows featuring us, telling about the COVID-19 origins. Please understand that we have connected some dots, but the full picture is not there yet. Lab leak is a plausible hypothesis. Not proved yet. @BahulikarRahul.
7
25
72
If after 17 years antibodies remain in SARS patients, the WHO team should really have demanded the miners serum samples which were 8 years old, to be examined by a third party. But they just trusted the oral story that they had fungus!.
1
16
74
This could be the reason why virologists were against the lab leak theory and supported only zoonosis: fear of tight regulations on virology research, especially involving manipulation, serial passaging of pathogens, GOF, etc. Tight regulations also means less grants to proposals
10
19
73
So, its not just a handful of people who think that lab leak could be the cause of the pandemic. FBI thinks so. DOE thinks so. A branch of DIA, and now we know that CIA too was of the same opinion. Isn't it a victory for all of us who constantly being criticized for our opinion!.
13
17
71
Nature Journal ignored, Science rejected without review, but Frontiers published our paper, which stands out with 1.1 lakh views today. We faced critics from Frutos, Flo Débarre etc trying to debunk our article. Cheers @BahulikarRahul and Drastic team in the fight!
6
19
70
This was me on 5th April 2020, when we lighted 🪔 throughout India to mark the fight against the upcoming COVID pandemic. Guys and girls here, do you all think that the lamp I lit that time has thrown at least some light on how the virus originated. Thoughts welcome!
10
7
73
This is one of the most important things in the origins: almost a smoking gun: Why is RaTG13 most divergent to Sars2 only at RBD? And at the rest of the genome it’s synonymous. If RaTG13 (modified sequence) was a coverup, why did they do this?? And to coverup what?.
@Florin_Uncovers @Rebecca21951651 @virologyanon @kellywind we also had an email exchange in response to the fact check i wrote. i wrote him that the divergence between RaTG13 and SARS2 is exceptionally high specifically in the RBS and FCS, two regions that had been manipulated before and that i found his statement "one would put a FCS in.
8
24
68
Have a wonderful “women’s day” all of my friends here! A very special one to the “covid origin truth digging women” to our hard work of 4 years! 🎉🎊💐🍫
4
9
74
Today is the day when something big has been achieved: Bipartisan investigation on COVID origins!
3
19
74
I found that Morens, Daszak were afraid of @R_H_Ebright and I find the reference of Drastic, and of @JamieMetzl .Enjoy this email from Morens:
7
13
72
So here is my theory how it came: .1. Mojiang mine excursions for 3-5 years. 2. Collection of samples from bats and throat swabs or other samples from miners, 2/4of them in 2012.3. Culturing virus or recombinant virus.4. Experiments with the spike, FCS, etc. 5. Oops!.
16
27
63
@R_H_Ebright They also have a figure there illustrating how they will reconstruct new sars-r covs.
2
14
67
Why is Peter Daszak suddenly focusing on the 293 and trying to make fun of our guesses? Definitely looks panicked when if the 293 guess is true, it clearly means that Baric knew about the RaTG13 sequence, and perhaps of the whole clade. And then US side of the DEFUSE gets darker!.
7
14
70
By the way, the authors who wrote proximal origins, who in their private discussions thought it very probable, were the ones who blocked me and many of us for asking them the right questions! Andersen, Holmes, Rambaut. and of course Daszak!.
3
15
68
I have a hypothesis regarding RaTG13. So, Shi realised that sars2 had a very identical sequence in the 370 base patch which was deposited. If they did not reveal the whole genome, sars2 would have been seen as the direct product of their lab.
10
14
71
Hats of to Billy Bostickson! @BillyBostickson Everyone should read his 3 papers on RG. He has compiled all the information so efficiently, that even ten teams cannot do! Three cheers to Drastic! And to Billy!.
3
10
66
If you change the name of a virus so that the original reference attached to its old name won’t be found is not “dubbing”, this is hiding the data. If you wanted to write a balanced article, you could have mentioned how @Rossana38510044 discovered 4991=RaTG13. @sciencecohen.
@BillyBostickson @BahulikarRahul @sciencecohen This proves from the beginning that Shi and now you say Linfa Wang too, released half information, partial truths, which were crucial information in the light of the pandemic which killed millions! And then too, you are so soft on them. You just said, RaTG13 was dubbed later!.
4
27
65
Animated video featuring Seeker, me and many others. It’s worth a watch:
5
27
68
The only closest relative of SARS-CoV2 disclosed to us was RaTG13. The place where it was collected is closed. No investigation of the mine. No in-depth investigation of any of the virology institutes in Wuhan. Many experiments, trials, vaccines were happening in Wuhan.
5
7
63
Why was Ra4991 aka RaTG13 sequence kept hidden till the pandemic??? Open question for zoonatis and their favourite press! @sciencecohen and your friends like Amy Maxmen, etc.
10
11
64
Because of programmes like Predict, Preempt, men went close to the nature. Sampled bats, brought the samples back, played with the genes, and now blame the pandemic on interaction of humans with Nature! And again billions of dollars going to be spent on the same! Going in circles.
4
17
64
We exactly don’t know how the virus leaked if it leaked. But the coverup to cover this is leaking very fast! Beware so called top experts! The story of a cooked zoonotic origin within 7 days is leaking out!.
4
5
66
The “zoo”notic origin also holds true, as many of the laboratories in Wuhan had their own “zoos” or a huge range of lab animals! We do not what kind of experiments were going on with them! @BillyBostickson isn’t it?.
7
18
63
SARS and MERS didn't progress to pandemic. SARS died after 2003 and MERS only affected 1500 people. What's wrong with SARS-CoV-2? Looks like its over optimized for humans, both pathogenecity wise and transmission wise.
15
18
66
I have tweeted before about this: if spike protein of RaTG13 and Sars2 are compared, the S2 part matches almost 100 percent and so does S1. The dissimilar part is the RBD, the minimal cassette needed for hACE2 to match. And exactly the RBD from so called pangolin cov matches.
9
12
66
@BallouxFrancois The poll looks incorrect. It could be both, a genetically engineered virus which leaked!.
1
4
64
Looking at the kind of data presented in the Worobey preprints, it’s becoming clearer that it was no way a natural virus jumping from an intermediate host.
2
16
61