It was a tech glitch that locked me out for 8 weeks, not @karelpopper's fantasy crusade, but he’s welcome to the delusion. Now that he’s blocked me and is urging strangers to report me, I suppose we finally have his answer on Koopmans’ COI: cowardice wrapped in a block.

Hensel just emailed me again saying I am misrepresenting his message to my employer. I am not having that conversation with him in private, it will be in full public view here. To be clear; in the message to my employer, Hensel complained that I haven’t replied to his personal

The search for the origins of Covid is so deeply politicized and problematic that I have decided to be fully open and transparent about the foul play happening in the background. I describe quite a lot of it in my book, and I will continue to write about it in public. This week,

@R_H_Ebright @StavaRune @sigridbratlie @MarionKoopmans They all figured out the truth early and now lie: in @JeremyFarrar 's book "Spike"

@StavaRune @sigridbratlie @MarionKoopmans As sock puppet "Rune Stava" knows: Andersen et al. 2020 concluded "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus" and "we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible." Andersen et al. 2020

Just need to know if Dr. Scary’s @Scary7Dr in the new Resident Evil. I mean, she’s out here handling the T-virus like she invented it.

BREAKING: My sister Marion receives a lintje for services rendered in the lab leak coverup. Still holds the highest score at Pingo. Some say it’s all connected. https://t.co/wrofPVzIRd

Zo’n bord voor de kop. Het gaat niet om die bokswedstrijd. Het gaat zelfs niet om vrouwen in de sport. Waar het om gaat is dat er de afgelopen zeg 10 jaar groepsdenken, één lijn + never admit to having been wrong is geslopen in het maatschappelijk debat. Trump, trans, COVID, 1

@Rebecca21951651 @JoshuaL68860745 @jhas5 @emilyakopp As I've said before, Marion Koopmans told me, in a taxi in Geneva, that she smuggled zika out of Brazil by vial-in-pocket, in contravention of Brazilian genetic resources and biosafety law. We were both attending a WHO meeting on management of West African Ebola outbreak samples.

Natural viruses do not result in 292 pages of this. Anyone who is in the field who is claiming it is a natural virus can not answer this logically. Small redactions will be 'protecting sources'. 292 pages of this from the NIH? It's not natural.

@angie_rasmussen Looks like you prefer not to answer. I understand. It must be terrible to realize that your own colleagues accidentally killed millions of people.

Koopmans’ department partnered with EcoHealth, which funded the Wuhan lab. She then helped "investigate" the lab, and now retweets a GPT essay arguing that’s not a conflict of interest. Seriously: what does constitute a COI if not that? https://t.co/cNnmQrjWEa

U.S. District Court Judge Kandis Westmore yesterday ordered the NIH to produce within one year the 43,000 pages of Gmails of David Morens (former senior advisor to Anthony Fauci) that may be relevant to the origins of Covid-19. #FOIA https://t.co/JBYkQe6xO3

This isn’t serious debate. It’s not about ideas. It’s about performance. And since you're not engaging with questions, not standing by claims, and not arguing in good faith, there’s no point continuing. We’re done.

So instead of facing that, you offload the thinking. You let GPT generate the confidence you don’t have. It’s not about convincing me. It’s about holding your worldview together. That’s what this has been: not a debate, but a coping mechanism.

And maybe that’s the real reason you’re doing this, not to persuade, but to reassure yourself. Because if you’re wrong about this, maybe the consensus is wrong about more than just this. And maybe you already know that.

You’re not debating. You’re outsourcing. GPT gives you confidence on demand, and you call that Serious Debate™. But it’s just intellectual theater, and everyone can see it.

You don’t know the topic. GPT isn’t rephrasing your thoughts, it’s doing the thinking for you. You post what it gives you, don’t stand by it, and backtrack when pressed. And clearly, you don’t understand how GPT works or what it’s actually doing.

And through all this… you’ve insisted this is a serious debate. That it’s going well. So let’s ask: what are you actually doing? Because it’s not debate. It doesn’t even look like debate.

When this was pointed out, you admitted there had been a "mix-up." Asked again for a real source, you responded with a 3,000-word GPT report, which also didn’t say what you claimed.

You said the database being offline was “concerning,” then posted a GPT-generated quote where Koopmans supposedly called for its release. When asked for a source, you linked to an article that didn’t say that.