Big thanks to @RecoilMag, Lars Smith, and @DaveFMerrill for a great opportunity to do an interview. Very solid support and respect. Recoil has shown itself to be a publication that contributes to 21st century mindsets. They have our support.

Still in the research pain-cave. But here’s a nugg:. Much of the sentiment of those who ardently support gun control measures are irrelevant as it pertains to real-world improvements with gun-related problems. Anyone with sense understands the math: if you reduce American gun.

We'll be starting a substack in the next few months to consolidate posting and publications.

On living in a "post-truth" era. Humans and human societies have been running on mythologies, stories, and dogma for a long long time. There's nothing new about humans choosing self-soothing belief over the hassle of facts. There's no such thing as "post-truth", really. We are.

As it pertains to known scholar-induced mythologies like Keeley's Myth of The Noble Savage:. "The difference between Archeologist Lawrence Keeley’s experience and my own? I am coming into the life-cycle of the myth that penetrates law and policy prior to the effort required to.

Does the academic / research culture skew the data associated with how the law / policy affects gun-related negatives?. Yes. 100%. They do this as a matter of course. Is the academic / research culture skewing the data on the actual occurrences of gun-related negatives? No, they.

After a seven-year-long review, I have come to the conclusion that there is enough evidence already in existence in gun violence studies to show that law and policy, as phenomena, possess a continuous fundamental ineffectiveness towards the problems that the associated legal.

Evidence without the counter-balancing evidence (on the other side of the coin) is not evidence that real problem-solvers should be interested in. This kind of partial evidence, however, seems to be very appealing to people with personal, professional, or political motivations.

Both @LibGunOwners and @davidyamane are quoted in this article in The French rag Liberation. Google Translation:. "I went to buy a gun": Faced with insecurity since Trump's return, Democrats are arming themselves. As feelings of insecurity have soared.

RT @davidyamane: Guns in America: 14 years of study summarized in 900 words. Please like/retweet + have a look at & share this essay using….

A segment from the upcoming work on The Myth of Law's Supremacy:. “The tendency to conceive of the shared vision of a specific historical community as the universal experience of a transcendental subject can be observed in every field of cultural production. Such fields appear as.

I won't be commenting here on current events. The problem with deeper work is that there is never a good time to do it. There is always something that the liberal community can be upset about that everyone in the community wants addressed - and every person has a different gate.

There's a lot of shifting and reprioritizing going on this year for LGO operations. There will be very little posting here over the first half of the year. The most important work we can do is deeper than this. Hang in there. Will be back to this channel soon enough.

RT @davidyamane: Today on @TheHillOpinion: Guns are not just for conservative white men. My title was: "The Unrecognized Diversity of Guns….

It’s 2025, lib-gunners. Stay Cool. Real cool.

RT @davidyamane: This could read as a "hot take" or as the result of 12 years wandering around and reflecting on American gun culture.

In thinking about @davidyamane talking about the "Cultured Despisers of Guns" recently. this phenomenon that we are now well into our second decade of observing. this belief that gun ownership is a function of lower or lesser people. First and foremost, this is not a.