i hate people like this because these ideas seep into people's brains and it makes my job harder. it's so much easier to teach math to someone who thinks they can learn it versus someone who internalized the idea that math is an innate skill only for geniuses
@lordofgummies33
I hate to say it, but as a former physics major, if you actually want to go into physics you should be the kind of person who finds this level of material completely obvious at 9 years old.
It's absolutely worth studying -- but physics only needs people who are math freaks.
engineers are so stupid they think one bad experience* legitimizes sexism
(* i'm skeptical of the story and if it did happen whether it's representative of the class)
you have to be incredibly stupid to fall for this lie. marx's writings about maths are available online (). you can read them and see he was grappling with a question mathematicians grappled with—how do you make sense of the derivative? it's not crankery
my nonbinary child had a perfect 1600 SAT, 4.20 GPA, was captain of the volleyball team and swim team in high school, and did a summer internship at NASA. yet they didn't get into Harvard nor MIT nor Penn because they refused to sign a declaration of support for Hamas
It's surreal to me that it's 2022 and there are still people out there who think 2 + 2 = 4 is an objective truth that was true before humans even existed and not just like a thing society agreed on because it's useful
@ggreenwald
Damn I remember when you would point to the fact that the federal US government didn't recognize your marriage as a bad thing and part of why you immigrated to Brazil lol
we need to teach students the foundation of mathematical thinking before we look at specific little applications. in what i modestly name "New Math" i propose we make primary students learn category theory before times tables
I think as mathematicians we need to come clean that prime numbers aren't actually interesting. Like, I guess it's neat that they show up in applied math to do cryptography, and it's a fun subject for amateurs to do recreational math, but the *mathematical* content is thin.
there's research about how this sort of idea is a big part of why math/physics have such a dismal gender ratio! shut up and stop hurting diversity in my field!
Just got word I'll be teaching my department's pre-calculus class next semester, and could use some advice. When you're teaching students the background knowledge they need to do calculus, do you think it's better to teach them Dedekind's or Cantor's construction of the reals?
I'm almost in awe at Rowling's confidence in herself as a writer that she would set for herself the task of explaining why the heroes of her story didn't stop the Holocaust.
Cauchy's biggest impact on maths was to not accept Galois's papers on polynomials for publication by the Academy of Sciences, which would have ensured Galois's entrance to the École Polytechnique, leading to a lifetime of research rather than an early death in a duel.
english is the best language because it fits in with human experience. like, if i'm at a restaurant and i need to know where the restroom is, it's so much more easier & natural to say "where is the restroom?" instead of "wo ist die Toilette?"
@KEEMSTAR
If you're absolutely opposed to sex with a trans person you have a responsibility to disclose that to potential partners before sexual activity.
@no_earthquake
i mean this in the nicest way possible but it is not surprising to learn the french are hella racist against yet another group of people
Why is calculus the default higher level math in high school and not statistics?
Is there a reason I don’t know about?
I feel like society would be way better off if they understood the basics of statistics.
I’m honestly curious.
Some say C is a bad language because it's not memory safe. On the contrary, that's why C is good. If Ocarina of Time had been programmed in a memory safe language we wouldn't have ACE and all the cool fun glitches & tricks it enables, which would be sad :(
@RayAlexWilliams
Ray, from one girl to another: if you haven't been able to get hair removal yet, the trick is to use a light foundation to counter the blue tint from the hair follicles beneath the surface.
@ajplus
Incredibly scummy to omit the detail that those missionaries were *citizens* of Kiribati who had left the island to do missionary work elsewhere and were finally coming home.
all math education did for my communication skills is now i'll use the word 'modulo' in casual conversation and expect non-initiates to know what i mean
i disagree. the reason oomfs think my arguments and connections make sense but the way i communicate them is bizarre and incomprehensible is because part of my education was me doing a lot of proof heavy mathematics 🙏
marx wrote in 1881. bolzano & weierstraß had formal definitions of limits in the 1810s—they were grappling with the same question as marx!—but it took decades to spread across mathematicians. marx didn't make a freshman calc error because that curriculum hadn't been developed yet
@ashleyfeinberg
Mad props to Chelsea for having the courage to say this publicly when she, like everyone else, could predict that this would be Glenn's response.
as an ultrafinitist, i think it's nonsense when people try to talk about numbers larger than the number of electrons in the universe. that's why i don't believe in 2
Mathematicians really should learn from programmers on how to do things. For example, every programmer knows you shouldn't use global variables. But mathematicians do it all the time, such as when they set a global value for π.
Earnest but perhaps hot take: It's a good thing when students call for unis to fire notorious transphobes who are actively involved in the political fight to deny trans people healthcare and rights.
Dear mathematicians,
Why few people read your work outside of academia is because you intentionally phrase things in a way that is exclusive to academia. Few on the outside understand, or care to understand symbolic logic.
Either change it or accept the cult label.
Dear analytic philosophers,
Why few people read your work outside of academia is because you intentionally phrase things in a way that is exclusive to academia. Few on the outside understand, or care to understand symbolic logic.
Either change it or accept the cult label.
The referee said my paper shouldn't be published because my proof of the main theorem is incomplete. Buddy, if incomplete things are unworthy of publication I've got some news for you about mathematics as a whole.
I hate the symbols in math so much. It just feels like unnecessary gatekeeping for trivial concepts. How many mathematical proofs could be made widely accessible with just a little bit of psuedocode?
idk why people say math is hard. It's not. If you want to decide whether X is ture just run a computer program which enumerates all possible proofs and see if it eventually outputs X or eventually outputs ¬X. Easy.
Some think mastodon is complicated, but it's actually quite simple. All you have to keep in mind is, mastodon is just a monoid in the category of endofunctors
Riffing on Tao (), 3 stages of mathematical development:
1. pre-anarchy: math is about universal rules
2. anarchy: the rules are arbitrary and you can make up whatever you want
3. post-anarchy: you can make up rules, but it's not arbitrary
academic journal websites should have an "open on sci-hub" button next to the "pay 57 USD for a pdf" button. sure it only saves me a few seconds each time, but those seconds add up
Here's a secret your calculus teacher won't let you in on: when we talk about a point in two dimensional euclidean space, what we really mean is a set of the form {{D}, {D,E}} where D and E are Dedekind cuts of rational numbers.
anyone else notice how often when people critique (allegedly) useless academic research how often the word "queer" appears in their critique? what's up with that?