jrockstrom Profile Banner
Johan Rockström Profile
Johan Rockström

@jrockstrom

Followers
78K
Following
119
Media
202
Statuses
4K

Director @PIK_climate. Also Professor @unipotsdam, @sthlmresilience. Internationally recognised Earth scientist on global sustainability, #PlanetaryBoundaries.

Joined January 2013
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@jrockstrom
Johan Rockström
8 days
Eating healthy food, prolongs your life, and gives major contributions to a healthy planet. This makes the food system transformation as important as the global energy transition to have a chance of prosperity and an equitable future for humanity on Earth https://t.co/ZU7MsjfJL5
7
78
135
@jrockstrom
Johan Rockström
9 days
Holding on to 1.5°C aligned mitigation pathways and science based targets is absolutely essential. In order to minimize overshoot, costs to investments & impacts on the global economy. And, it is doable, zero solutions are there and are winners https://t.co/xW7NGlpLTW via @ft
Tweet card summary image
ft.com
Global warming means hope of limiting increase to 1.5C is now ‘unrealistic’, says NBIM’s head of governance
12
34
68
@OECD
OECD ➡️ Better Policies for Better Lives
13 days
In the coming decades, global population & GDP growth are projected to increase & ultimately accelerate common drivers underpinning the triple challenge posed by climate change, biodiversity loss & pollution. Report shows the full scale of these impacts: https://t.co/6WwYa0K3qs
2
112
159
@rahmstorf
Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf 🌏 🦣
13 days
Yearly wind power production. China leads the world; the US started its exponential growth some years after Europe but then caught up with the EU. Cheap wind power is now threatening fossil fuel profits, a powerful lobby with obvious undue hold over the Trump administration.
40
274
692
@jrockstrom
Johan Rockström
13 days
Sannolikheten för en kollaps av AMOC [systemet av havströmmar i Atlanten som reglerar havets värmeutbyte och klimatet i Sverige, Norden och världen] är nu så hög, trots osäkerhet, att det måste anses vara en oacceptabel risk. Som troligen kan undvikas. Norden måste visa ledarskap
4
38
76
@WeDontHaveTime
We Don't Have Time
13 days
"An economy driven by fossil fuels & extraction cannot continue without putting the planet at risk". 🚨 @jrockstrom, @PIK_climate in #Davos. The pathway to prosperity is clear: align with science, live within planetary boundaries, phase out #fossilfuels: now. ⏱️ #WEF2026
6
32
54
@jrockstrom
Johan Rockström
13 days
The destabilisation of the #AMOC is no longer a distant scenario - it’s a national and global security risk. In a new article in Dagens Nyheter, Iceland’s Climate Minister Jóhann Páll Jóhannsson and I outline actions to tackle this threat: https://t.co/1tfJJGNpUT (in Swedish)
dn.se
Vad händer om Golfströmmen stannar av? Den senaste forskningen tyder på att vi kan närma oss så kallade tippningspunkter.
10
114
225
@PIK_Climate
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research PIK
20 days
“This is not the time for resignation; it’s a time of heightened urgency.” In a blog post ahead of @wef annual meeting #WEF26, PIK Director @jrockstrom and @CnobreRes (@usponline) highlight the importance of the 1.5C limit, naming four deciding factors. https://t.co/ZbRY5lmORb
Tweet card summary image
weforum.org
Scientific consensus indicates that global warming has reached the 1.5°C threshold, requiring climate policy to shift from commitments to the rapid, science-aligned phase-out of fossil fuels.
5
21
34
@PIK_Climate
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research PIK
22 days
PIK scientists took part in 2 studies that made it into the "climate papers most featured in media" @CarbonBrief 2025 edition: No1 with PIK scientist William F. Lamb & No5 with PIK Director @jrockstrom 👏 No1: https://t.co/t84lRBwF2J No5:
Tweet card summary image
pik-potsdam.de
03.10.2025 - Food production is the primary driver for breaching five of the planetary boundaries and accounts for around 30 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, while billions still lack...
@CarbonBrief
Carbon Brief
22 days
NEW – Analysis: The climate papers most featured in the media in 2025 | @rtmcswee @AyeshaTandon Read here: https://t.co/7i1DYWmaqB
2
25
43
@PIK_Climate
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research PIK
23 days
“We are at the beginning of the end of the fossil fuel economy. The US is betting on the wrong horse.” PIK Director @jrockstrom spoke to @nytimes about how the clean energy transition is gathering speed despite the actions of the Trump administration.
Tweet card summary image
nytimes.com
The president’s embrace of fossil fuels and withdrawal from the global fight against climate change will make it hard to keep warming at safe levels, scientists said.
2
31
54
@PIK_Climate
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research PIK
24 days
Europe’s forests are weakening under heat, drought & pests, yet climate targets rely on them. This is dangerous says PIKs @jrockstrom because "countries can use their carbon sink from forests to say they're net zero without fully phasing out fossil fuels.” https://t.co/PP5VdAMkYp
Tweet card summary image
theguardian.com
Vast swathes of the country’s trees have been killed off by droughts and infestations, in a trend sweeping across Europe. A shift towards more biodiverse cultivation could offer answers
11
98
220
@PIK_Climate
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research PIK
27 days
“The U.S. turns its back against science, against global collaboration, against any kind of action on #climatechange,” PIK Director @jrockstrom says on the U.S. pulling out of the @UNFCCC. “The world loses a lot and it is very damaging.”
Tweet card summary image
apnews.com
U.S. President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the United Nations climate framework marks a significant escalation of anti-climate policy.
3
40
56
@jrockstrom
Johan Rockström
28 days
The 10 New Insights in Climate Science report highlights recent, policy-relevant advances in climate research. Researchers working on new or emerging findings are encouraged to contribute insights for the next report. More information on how to contribute below.
@PIK_Climate
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research PIK
28 days
📢 Call for expert input: Researchers across the natural and social sciences are invited to share key recent developments in climate change research for the next "10 New Insights in Climate Science" report. 📝 Questionnaire: https://t.co/mSdrQN45KT 🔗 https://t.co/vLTre3Y5ck
0
15
20
@hausfath
Zeke Hausfather
1 month
Humans have emitted 2750 gigatons of CO2 since the industrial revolution from burning fossil fuels and land use change. To put this in perspective, this is more than the (dry) mass of all living things on earth and everything humans have ever built combined:
413
726
2K
@rahmstorf
Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf 🌏 🦣
2 months
What is the global ocean overturning circulation, and why does it matter for you? Here’s a great short explainer by the Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science. Did you know a slowing ocean overturning circulation could affect your life? https://t.co/5onjCszJm5
antarctic.org.au
The Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science (ACEAS) today published a new Explainer on the Meridional Overturning Circulation (MOC) – a vast system of ocean currents that underpins...
18
216
395
@jrockstrom
Johan Rockström
2 months
Check out the 2026 Global Risk Report where Justice and Goverance forms an integral part of us having a chance to deviate away from unacceptable and unmanageable, but avoidable nasty outcomes. https://t.co/GZc9pnkPuZ
3
209
353
@jrockstrom
Johan Rockström
2 months
3. Constraints drive innovation and 2035 phase-out is an effective boundary with clear incentives. The world is in the midst of the race away from ICE to electric mobility. Introducing "flexibility" creates uncertainty and slows down the unstoppable path towards future mobility
1
9
24
@jrockstrom
Johan Rockström
2 months
2. 5% offsetting and compensating ICE emissions with green steel does not work. The reason is that the RCB is so limited that ALL sectors need to decarbonise until 2040, both steel AND oil (domestic & abroad). Great to do both! But, not possible to offset one against the other.
1
8
19
@jrockstrom
Johan Rockström
2 months
1. Missing climate targets. EUs recent decision to reduce emissions by 90% by 2040 is positive but scientifically insufficient. The Remaining Carbon Budget (RCB) is essentially consumed, and 1.5°C will be breached within 5-10 years. EU must reach zero emissions sooner than 2040.
1
3
6
@jrockstrom
Johan Rockström
2 months
Here are the 3 reasons why the EU Commission decision to abandon 2035 end-date for the Internal combustion engine (ICE) is the wrong decision. 1 EU will miss its climate targets 2 Offsetting does not work 3 European car industry will lose in the competition & race against China
8
39
90