Jolanda C
@Jolanda04
Followers
2K
Following
22K
Media
3K
Statuses
16K
Dedicated to exposing discrimination, bullying & victimisation in the DET, incl tampering of state records/tests by the SSU & the process used to cover it up
Joined March 2009
📢For over 20 years I’ve been trying to expose the system and process that allowed children to be systematically bullied, victimised, neglected, and targeted for more than 16 years — while those in power looked on. ❌The NACC’s letter proves my point:. 1️⃣ They didn’t use my
@DavidShoebridge The NACC had 200 pages of irrefutable evidence and said they say they saw no evidence of corrupt conduct. They are not there to identify misconduct, they are there to protect the Government - AT ANY COST. 🔗🔗 ICAC is the same, as.
3
11
29
Children are not the ones being protected. 🔗
0
0
1
Children are not the ones being protected:.🔗
0
0
3
The destruction of state records under active FOI — and the neglect & abuse of children that followed — should have been a national scandal. ➡️Instead it was covered up, with the media silent for 20+ years. That’s why I keep publishing the evidence myself - people need to see.
Wow I thought California was corrupt. I presume you’re being ignored by the (corrupt and malfeasant) Australian media. This is DISGUSTING corruption, deleting evidence with an open case? Extraordinary.
2
1
4
The person who destroyed the records also handled the complaints, appeals, FOIs — and was the one I was told to ‘meet’ with to resolve it. ➡️That’s the loop.➡️That's the process.
0
0
0
“If Robodebt victims who ‘took themselves home’ had their debts wiped, were those cases then closed off — not only from compensation, but from investigations too? . If so, the most tragic evidence was erased to protect the system.”.
I have something to say, and feel I am being censored on this! The reason I was excluded from the class action was that Centrelink raised and wiped Jarrad's debt after I informed them he had taken himself home. Was this a coincidence? No, I know it was not. Thanks Stuart Robert!.
2
2
3
The cover-up didn’t start at the top. Bureaucrats manipulated evidence, while Ministers and investigatory bodies were fed prepared briefs. Even if — and when — those higher up realised, they were already part of the cover-up. The process pulls everyone in.
📢For over 20 years I’ve been trying to expose the system and process that allowed children to be systematically bullied, victimised, neglected, and targeted for more than 16 years — while those in power looked on. ❌The NACC’s letter proves my point:. 1️⃣ They didn’t use my
0
0
1
Age 61? I need to show evidence to get a senior discount. ➡️Bureaucrats facing allegations? .➡️No proof required — their word alone shuts the case. ➡️Case closed.
1
0
4
Here’s another reason why I keep fighting. 🎯They painted me as the monster. 🔗 ❌ The real monsters are the bureaucrats who targeted my children for 16+ years — still sitting in power, shielded by the process, free to go on neglecting and abusing.
FOI documents show the pattern:. 1⃣ First I was framed as a danger to other parents. 2⃣ Then as a danger to my own children. 3⃣ Then as vexatious .4⃣ Then I was blacklisted. To this day, they refuse to provide the grounds — they claim the record was destroyed, leaving only
0
0
1
🚨People sometimes wonder why I keep fighting. It’s not just about my children. It’s about the process — the administrative system that was weaponised to target us, cover up misconduct, and silence complaints. That same process has harmed countless others. Different cases,.
📢For over 20 years I’ve been trying to expose the system and process that allowed children to be systematically bullied, victimised, neglected, and targeted for more than 16 years — while those in power looked on. ❌The NACC’s letter proves my point:. 1️⃣ They didn’t use my
2
0
2
Covering up is bad enough. 🎯But continuing to target children? .❌That’s evil. 🔗
🚨Do our investigatory bodies regard the destruction of state records and conflicts of interest as corrupt conduct?. This letter from my solicitors to Bob Wingrave, dated 24 November 2003, refers to earlier letters sent 21 October & 14 November 2003 in relation to discrepancies
0
0
1
After the original answer sheets were destroyed under active FOI, I requested certified text files of my children's tests directly from ACER (the marking authority). 🔹 ACER sent the certified text file to Bob Wingrave. Three days later, metadata shows he created a document
0
0
0
To add: In case you need to see more evidence of the connection see attached. NACC and ICAC had all this evidence and mountains more. 🔗 27 November - matter 03/10994 listed as an appeal. 27 November - blacklist
@bugwannostra I asked AI about my allegations against the Department of Education and this is what it said. If AI were to analyze the evidence and allegations you've presented, it would likely conclude the following:. 1️⃣ Tampering with Student Test Scores – Manipulating a child’s test results.
0
0
1
🚨Do our investigatory bodies regard the destruction of state records and conflicts of interest as corrupt conduct?. This letter from my solicitors to Bob Wingrave, dated 24 November 2003, refers to earlier letters sent 21 October & 14 November 2003 in relation to discrepancies
📢For over 20 years I’ve been trying to expose the system and process that allowed children to be systematically bullied, victimised, neglected, and targeted for more than 16 years — while those in power looked on. ❌The NACC’s letter proves my point:. 1️⃣ They didn’t use my
3
0
6
DET presented the appeals process as if it were a genuine “investigation.”. The Ombudsman agreed — saying appeals were a “satisfactory means of redress” and refusing to step in. But appeals were run by officials with conflicts of interest — the very people allegations were made
0
0
0
I also forgot to include one more rejection. After missing out on Year 7 selective High school placement and enduring a trauma-filled year in a comprehensive school (adult bullying & targeting), my son applied again for Year 8. He was unsuccessful and lost his appeal. The
1
0
0
The Selective Schools Unit deliberately misrepresented me and my complaint. Not only did they portray me as dangerous to other parents and my own children and of wanting copies of Selective School tests - they said I was complaining because my children didn't get first-choice
1
0
1
DET lied about me asking for parent rep names & tests. ❌They also lied about my motives — saying was demanding first-choice selective schools. ➡️ The truth: I never demanded first-choice placements. My complaint was that my children were targeted — their marks manipulated,.
1
0
1
Want to know what types of allegations the Ombudsman refuses to investigate? See attached. 😲Two phone calls with one of the very bureaucrats accused — and case closed. 🥳The Dept rejoiced. 😢The children were left at the mercy of their abusers
@noisywomanMP @hughriminton @Richard_D_Boyle In 2022 the NSW Ombudsman conducted just one investigation. If they can choose not to investigate serious allegations, how can this office be fit for purpose?
0
0
0