Jeremy Biesanz Profile
Jeremy Biesanz

@JCBiesanz

Followers
162
Following
4
Media
9
Statuses
69

Personality psychology, quantitative methods, interpersonal perception, and accuracy of first impressions

Vancouver, BC
Joined May 2013
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
7 years
We are hiring this fall! A new tenure track position in Quant Psych here at UBC to expand our area. See the details at
0
13
14
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
Spreed
0
0
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
My office's personal pillar of doom, I guess, as column failure is likely apparently. http://t.co/0vYN8o8MeZ
0
0
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
Even though Kenny, "which houses the psychology department, is ranked as “Very High Risk” according to [UBC's] the seismic safety report"
0
0
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
But they will retrofit the building, right? Oh snap! "...the university has no current plans to retrofit the building"
0
0
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
My office: "the eastern wing “will undergo significant torsion with column or wall failure likely.” Work more from home I guess.
0
0
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
Excellent reporting at the Ubyssey, the student newspaper at UBC, on seismic risk for campus buildings. http://t.co/C2kumfFnmq
0
0
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
Move to Vancouver BC. We don't have I-5 so we are totally safe here. Clearly.
0
0
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
Why stop there? Calculate and report the .01 CI. Sounds impressive AND has a very tight interval! Definite win-win.
@EngelhardtCR
Chris Engelhardt
10 years
Dog tired of your 95% CIs just barely missing zero and inviting skepticism? My solution: calculate a 50% CI.
0
0
2
@AlxEtz
Alexander Etz
10 years
Sorry, but no, you can't say that.
@gallantlab
Jack Gallant
10 years
Don't say, "my result is significant at p<.05". Say, "I estimate that there is less than 5% chance that this is completely random."
1
1
1
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
Requiring direct replications benefits even large sample research (for psych). Comparing n=40 vs 300. http://t.co/nk8VkQSIM7
0
3
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
The gesalt of this culinary masterpiece is quite interesting. Parenting win or fail? Sasha was most excited though! http://t.co/wIWmGG3V3e
0
0
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
For the past year we have been talking about combining his three favourite culinary passions. We finally did it. 2/3 http://t.co/FWJgd7t6cA
0
0
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
My son's three favorite foods are sushi, chocolate, and kropsua (savoury Finnish oven pancakes). He cannot decide which he likes more. (1/3)
0
0
0
@simonpbates
Simon Bates
10 years
All star cast from #UBC talking about ed leadership. Need wider angle lens! @cdrawn @clhendricksbc @joannealisonfox http://t.co/lejDfgAExP
0
4
2
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
10 years
First we need to replicate this!
0
1
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
11 years
About time!
@siminevazire
simine vazire
11 years
news flash: tables & figures will soon be embedded in MS for SPPS submissions.
0
0
0
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
11 years
Is this CACKing? (changing after criteria are known). Distant cousin of HARKing
@siminevazire
simine vazire
11 years
@RyneSherman @JnfrLTackett @BrentDonnellan What?! I'm saying Brent will be the MOST popular!
0
0
1
@JCBiesanz
Jeremy Biesanz
11 years
I would go with a distribution of statisticians. Of course that is what leads to the quarrel...
@AlxEtz
Alexander Etz
11 years
"What's the collective noun for a group of statisticians? "A quarrel." -George Box
0
0
1
@deevybee
Dorothy Bishop
11 years
ICYMI on Guardian sci HQ, here's my blogpost on future of scientific publishing #FSSC http://t.co/GtwTk9TXF5
0
9
7