GoodSciProject Profile Banner
Good Science Project Profile
Good Science Project

@GoodSciProject

Followers
1K
Following
7
Media
15
Statuses
227

The Good Science Project is devoted to improving the funding and practice of science.

Joined December 2021
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@GoodSciProject
Good Science Project
3 years
A new way to keep up with the Good Science Project activities:
0
17
166
@stuartbuck1
Stuart Buck
2 years
One thing about philanthropy that has bothered me for about a decade is how inefficient, bespoke, and ad hoc it is, especially when it comes to high-net-worth individuals and family offices. Lots of people who have more money than they could ever spend on themselves, and who
6
15
97
@stuartbuck1
Stuart Buck
2 years
A recent piece: Why Are We Screwing Over Researchers Who Make Innovative Discoveries? The piece delves into the effect of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which basically allowed universities (rather than government) to patent discoveries made with federal funds. But what about
2
4
14
@stuartbuck1
Stuart Buck
2 years
New piece at the Good Science Project, on a recent academic paper about delays/gaps in NIH funding. We need to have mechanisms for bridging gaps in funding. Otherwise, scientists are left to scramble for resources, and often have to fire people. https://t.co/HQnXuqjy2Q
1
4
4
@jeremyphoward
Jeremy Howard
2 years
There are few things more important to our civilization than understanding how to better do R&D. Thankfully, @eric_is_weird has dedicated himself to studying this question. As a result, he's become the foremost scholar and historian of 19th and 20th century R&D labs. 1/đź§µ
4
59
454
@jeremyphoward
Jeremy Howard
2 years
# Lessons from history’s greatest R&D labs: A historical analysis of what the earliest electrical and great applied R&D labs can teach https://t.co/gAatlfwlnE, and potential pitfalls. Note from Jeremy: This is a guest post from @eric_is_weird, cross-posted from FreakTakes
7
23
180
@GoodSciProject
Good Science Project
2 years
New essay: "Texas Gas Stations, NIH-Sponsored Post-Docs, and the Foolishness of Artificially Subsidizing Demand." https://t.co/VibfmxP5tA
1
0
0
@stuartbuck1
Stuart Buck
2 years
New column on why NIH-sponsored post-docs would be better off working for a Texas gas station: https://t.co/2FnXdzErYb
0
5
38
@stuartbuck1
Stuart Buck
2 years
New podcast interview with Monya Baker at Issues in Science and Technology: https://t.co/GAvxXakkq7 https://t.co/q4Sp62C689 https://t.co/dowmVIZs2M
0
2
3
@Sam_Apple1
Sam Apple
2 years
🚨 New Science Journalism Fellowship! The Johns Hopkins Science Writing program and @GoodSciProject are awarding $5K reporting grants for articles that reveal flaws in science policy, practice, or funding. Grateful for RTs and help spreading the word. https://t.co/1f1U6Fg3nG
advanced.jhu.edu
Apply for the Good Science Project fellowship grant, a $5000 reporting grant for articles on the funding and practice of science in the U.S.
0
50
59
@stuartbuck1
Stuart Buck
2 years
For science journalists: The Good Science Project is joining with Johns Hopkins to sponsor a set of awards for reporting on science policy issues (e.g., funding high-risk, high-reward research). https://t.co/QY1Iloh0eB
advanced.jhu.edu
Apply for the Good Science Project fellowship grant, a $5000 reporting grant for articles on the funding and practice of science in the U.S.
3
8
19
@stuartbuck1
Stuart Buck
2 years
It's Saturday night, and I'll probably post about this again, but I just wrote up well over 20k words on my personal history as a metascience venture capitalist (so to speak).
3
21
58
@stuartbuck1
Stuart Buck
2 years
Good article featuring @patrickc, @tylercowen, @BrianNosek, @SchmidtFutures, and more.
0
2
14
@stuartbuck1
Stuart Buck
3 years
Glad to have partnered with @BrookingsInst and @IFP on this project!
@davidmwessel
David Wessel
3 years
Could the NIH – annual budget $47 billion – do better at spurring research that improves human well-being? If so, how?  My @BrookingsEcon colleagues asked several scholars for (short) proposals towards “Building a better NIH.”  https://t.co/No8dcAIgNl #BetterNIH
0
2
12
@jenniferdoleac
Jennifer Doleac
3 years
1
1
2
@stuartbuck1
Stuart Buck
3 years
New article on why federal agencies and IRBs should pursue the "minimum viable bureaucracy" so as to reduce the time scientists have to spend on forms, reports, letters, etc.
1
7
21
@AcademyHealth
AcademyHealth
3 years
NEW blog from @stuartbuck1: "The Evidence Act and Health: How We Can Do Better." https://t.co/6AZMckOJZW
0
2
0