I wrote the same thing there, and apparently the information was picked up by a journalist. I wasn't making a big deal out of it at all, but it's funny to see the absurd number of users who wanted to share with me the fact that I'm a nobody and they don't care -- thank you! In

https://t.co/dZyqQmT1El

Encantada de haber hablado con @LaVanguardia sobre IA y compañía artificial: por qué no se trata solo de “parejas virtuales”, sino de modelos de negocio, datos y nuevas formas de relación con la tecnología. Intentar entender lo que ya está pasando, sin pánico moral ni ingenuidad.

We’re debating whether to ban this number’s customization — it’s been causing too much personality on the road.

I really wanted 🦋 to work, but it looks like I’m on the worst block lists out there. Oh, well.

We've just published the Smol Training Playbook: a distillation of hard earned knowledge to share exactly what it takes to train SOTA LLMs ⚡️ Featuring our protagonist SmolLM3, we cover: 🧭 Strategy on whether to train your own LLM and burn all your VC money 🪨 Pretraining,

Quando abbiamo iniziato a cercare conforto nelle macchine? Il mio nuovo op-ed su @wireditalia parte da un dato inquietante: milioni di persone oggi confidano le proprie crisi emotive all’intelligenza artificiale. Non perché la credano umana. Ma perché non trovano alternative

gpt-oss-safeguard lets developers use their own custom policies to classify content. The model interprets those policies to classify messages, responses, and conversations. These models are fine-tuned versions of our gpt-oss open models, available under Apache 2.0 license. Now

🤖 Did you know your voice might be cloned without your consent from just *one sentence* of audio? That's not great. So with @frimelle , we brainstormed a new idea for developers who want to curb malicious use: ✨The Voice Consent Gate.✨ Details, code, here:

Join the ELLIS Institute Finland Scientific Seminar in Espoo 🇫🇮 on Nov 18: a landmark event uniting research, industry and policy. Speakers: @GiadaPistilli, @kchonyc, @ericmalmi, @SergeBelongie, @wellingmax, @lauraruotsa, @TuringChiefSci & more 🔗

Read the article here:

I spoke with @techreview about one of the hardest design questions in conversational AI: should an AI ever be allowed to hang up on a human? In the piece by @odonnell_jm, we discussed how cutting users off can be harmful when strong emotional bonds or dependencies have formed.

@frimelle @techpolicypress Read our op-ed here:

What if your most personal chat logs became the next source of ad data? After our blog post on AI intimacy and transparency, @frimelle and I expanded the reflection in an op-ed for @techpolicypress. We look at what happens when generative AI conversations (the ones we treat as

Really delighted that I was able to speak to @_KarenHao on @MorePerfectUS about the "AI Psychosis" problem. It's a great piece with key details on the issue, check it out!

Your sexy AI companion will soon tell you which shoes to buy -- with @GiadaPistilli we've been thinking about intimacy and advertisement in AI chatbots: https://t.co/EsiDCVb07f

AI systems mirror our priorities. If we separate ethics from sustainability, we risk building technologies that are efficient but unjust, or fair but unsustainable. Read the blog post here:

We explore how two key concepts, evaluation and transparency, can serve as bridges between these domains: 📊 Evaluation, by moving beyond accuracy or performance metrics to include environmental and social costs, as we’ve done with tools like the AI Energy Score. 🔍

Ethical and sustainable AI development can’t be pursued in isolation. The same choices that affect who benefits or is harmed by AI systems also determine how much energy and resources they consume.

🌎 AI ethics and sustainability are two sides of the same coin. In our new blog post with @SashaMTL, we argue that separating them (as is too often the case) means missing the bigger picture of how AI systems impact both people and the planet.

We’re recruiting at Johns Hopkins School of Government and Policy! We’re looking for (among others) people with interests in AI, Science and Innovation, coming from any relevant disciplinary background. One noteworthy point: we’re keen for people with CS PhDs to apply.