
Big Ten information. College football fan
@Genetics56
Followers
16K
Following
111
Media
3K
Statuses
35K
Father & husband. College football fan. I tweet about all things related to college athletics.
Joined July 2008
You are upset today because your feelings must have gotten hurt. I have heard it all for Big Ten bashing. Your attempt at an Endowment tax is pretty funny since no school in the Big Ten will be harmed by it. They will call up the richest alumni for a new $20M gift.
@Genetics56 You do not make any sense - all I know / .Most of #BigTen are in big financial trouble - now with taxes on endowments- Rutgers owes $70 million - Iowa -Minnesota to cold &poor to get legit players - @USFFootball beaches - $$$ - surplus budget @RandyR358 .
0
0
3
No, Pat, you got it wrong. The agent was shoping around for a 3 year deal and all of the big name schools said no. Texas Tech was the only school willing to be dumb enough to screw up their rev share allocation. The agent admitted to it on the radio last night. 13% to 15% 🤦‍♂️.
Texas football recruiting will be just fine. But the 4th wasn't the Horns' happiest day, losing a five-star lineman to Texas Tech and a four-star WR (whose dad was a Longhorn) to Notre Dame.
0
0
8
Complain about it to your own AD statement. You are barking up the wrong tree.
@Genetics56 But it seems “you make 💩 up” you said yesterday @gocougs123 was getting $4.5 million for football next year - to make some ridiculous point you were making - but the real number is at least twice as much $8.5 to $12.5 million @RandyR358 to avoid clutter -legit info needed
1
0
3
Lol. And he blocked me and any FSU fan he could find just to have himself show he had no clue what he was talking about. It's no different than the conference realignment YouTubers that flip flop their guesses every day.
@Genetics56 sitting here having to watch old podcasts he was on to fulfill my petty mission lol.
1
0
11
It is all paid for and the class is littered with 3 stars. Congrats!!!!!. Is there at least one reasonably smart Texas Tech fan or are all of them stupid?.
@Genetics56 Genetics is wrong once again. Tech, like many other schools front loaded multi-year deals. They won’t need to spend to the cap for next year, as it’s already been paid for. Stupid.
0
0
2
No shit it grows each year, MR Genius. It is already set for 10 years and can grow higher if the averages that lead to it grows. You are showing your own stupidity.
@grok @RickyNCAA @Genetics56 You mean to tell me @Genetics56 was wrong again???. Shocking!. How people take any right this idiot says seriously is laughable.
0
0
0
Not that I am aware of. I wouldn't sign a contract like that in my personal life or if I was a HS football recruit in 2025/6. Unfortunately, a lot of parents are not going to know a good contract vs an adversarial one.
@Genetics56 Are offsets allowed in revenue-share contracts (e.g., guarantee a total $ but reduce the rev share $ paid by whatever NIL $ an athlete gets, up to a certain amount)?.
0
0
0
Not being private. There's no exit strategy. Even private schools have the same limitations for PE. Personally, I am very happy that PE in college athletics is dying out. There are smarter ways to have funds than a 15% fee. Now if the media would stop saying Super League 🙄.
@Genetics56 Is the limiting factor the public/private status of the university or more about school charters/statutes?.
1
0
0
The agent said on Fox Sports radio tonight it was 13% to 15% of Texas Tech's rev share allotment. I knew there would be schools who make bad rev share agreements. I didn't expect it to be that bad though. Good grief the incompetence. I respect Texas for saying no.
assuming Texas Tech uses $16M in rev share for football for the next 3 years ($48M), they have used up 10.5% of their rev share budget for the next 3 years on this kid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
1
1
14
You are an idiot wasting my time
@Genetics56 Now moving the goalposts . And still ignoring the fact they have a NIL collective so you saying they have 16 million to spend on a roster is incorrect . But you won’t admit that . Btw they have 2 other 4* so you’re incorrect AGAIN
0
0
3
In the NFL the cap is adjusted. In college it is already set for the next 10 years unless the averages increase to raise the cap. And most CFB programs will have $16Mish a year to keep players and recruit a class. Tech's class has no 4 star, lots of 3 stars. They overspent on 1.
@Genetics56 10% is 10%. You’re the one who gave that number . They expect him to he an elite college OL, that’s why they paid him . You’re also being obtuse and pretending TT doesn’t have massive NIL to compensate for the rest of the roster.
5
1
9
Larger salary cap pool to work with and rosters in the 50's, not 85. And an NFL OT getting 10% is HOF level, not a UDFA riding the bench or practice squad. Paying a HS kid the equivalent of a top 3rd RD draft pick is not smart use of the rev share cap.
@YoHoNoles @Genetics56 So NFL teams that use up 10% or more on one olineman are all idiots?.
1
0
8
Some recruits will chase the bag. The smart programs will not bag chase with recruits. Gotta make sure you recruit players that fit the program culture. Giving a kid millions in rev share can lead to many kids not caring to put in the work.
@Genetics56 🤣. Please tell me again how it’s about relationships and recruiting. 🤣.
2
0
22
Since 1976, Florida State football has won 433 games. Ohio State: 471.Alabama: 451.Nebraska: 419. Sure, FSU has no future in the P2. 🙄Simple logic tells us they do.
@Genetics56 people don’t realize what the FSU brand/sports teams have been able to do in a short amount of time and being a fairly younger school than the top blue bloods. That is why they’re next up in the big expansion.
1
3
45
UNC. I've already talked about it during the winter and spring. UNC is finally showing they care for once. Now to see the results.
@Genetics56 So tell me, which school has a Super Bowl winning General Manager, well versed in salary cap decisions, running its football program?.
1
0
5
For NIL the market a player plays in impacts the ability to get approved for a higher NIL deal. That is now valuations work. The lower market players will have a lower dollar value. Obviously a $700 NIL is a nothing burger for evaluation. But a $3M shoe deal? Yes.
@Genetics56 Money being available for all to spend, don’t you think destination cities drive up the price for a majority of these schools? As it is price went up when everyone could offer NIL but let’s be honest here live in Lubbock or LA, Memphis or Miami if money is close.
0
0
0